Re: [Gen-art] [Rats] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

Thank you Laurence, + 1 as well, both of the suggested sentences are Ok for me. Have a nice weekend, Ines. On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:38 PM Smith, Ned wrote: > +1 to either of LL's suggestions. > > On 8/11/23, 11:28 AM, "lgl securitytheory.com" > wrote: > > >

Re: [Gen-art] [Rats] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

+1 to either of LL's suggestions. On 8/11/23, 11:28 AM, "lgl securitytheory.com" mailto:l...@securitytheory.com>> wrote: > On Aug 10, 2023, at 1:51 PM, Ines Robles > > wrote: > > Many thanks Laurence for addressing my comments and for the providing

Re: [Gen-art] [Rats] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rats-eat-21

> On Aug 10, 2023, at 1:51 PM, Ines Robles > wrote: > > Many thanks Laurence for addressing my comments and for the providing > clarifications > > I understand the provided motive to not imply the trust to be static. > Perhaps, one way to convey the potentially varying degree of trust