On Apr 30, 2014, at 11:39 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Nits and Editorial Comments:
-- idnits reports: The document seems to use 'NOT RECOMMENDED' as an RFC 2119
keyword, but
does not include the phrase in its RFC 2119 key words list.
NOT RECOMMENDED is a RFC2119 keyword. The issue
Ben Campbell wrote:
I think it's reasonable to say that good administration practices involve
random key generation, and that the interface should not prevent the entry of
arbitrary hex strings. But the text says things like
When creating keys, it is RECOMMENDED that keys be derived from
On 01/05/2014 23:55, Jouni wrote:
On Apr 30, 2014, at 11:39 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
Nits and Editorial Comments:
-- idnits reports: The document seems to use 'NOT RECOMMENDED' as an RFC
2119 keyword, but
does not include the phrase in its RFC 2119 key words list.
NOT RECOMMENDED
On 02/05/2014 00:07, Alan DeKok wrote:
...
I'll try to weasel-word the document some more. But it's hard to make
the document idiot-proof.
If I can chip in, one thing that tends to happen in Gen-ART reviews
is that people who have essentially zero knowledge of the topic make
a serious effort
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
If I can chip in, one thing that tends to happen in Gen-ART reviews
is that people who have essentially zero knowledge of the topic make
a serious effort to understand a draft. So they (we) do tend to
trip over things that are common knowledge to people active in the
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.
Document: draft-ietf-radext-dtls-11
Reviewer: Ben
Ben Campbell wrote:
-- 3.2, last paragraph:
I'm still confused about how this is a bid down attack.
[The author replied that, when secure and insecure packets are allowed from
the same client, a
malicious or broken client can choose the insecure one. That's bad,
when the intent is to
Thanks for the quick response. Comments inline, with sections that do not
appear to need further content removed.
On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote:
Ben Campbell wrote:
-- 3.2, last paragraph:
I'm still confused about how this is a bid down attack.
