Stewart, thanks for your reviews. Bhuvan, thanks for addressing Stewart’s
comments. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Apr 17, 2018, at 2:04 AM, bhuvaneswaran.vengainat...@veryxtech.com wrote:
>
> Hi Stewart ,
>
> Thank you reviewing the changes in the revised draft. We apologize
Brian, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Apr 2, 2018, at 10:36 PM, Brian Carpenter
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Brian Carpenter
> Review result: Ready
>
> Gen-ART *Last Call* review of draft-ietf-stir-rph-03
>
> I am the
Dale, thanks for your reviews. Marc, thanks for your response. I have entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Apr 16, 2018, at 5:49 PM, Marc Petit-Huguenin
> wrote:
>
> Thanks again for the review. Comments inline.
>
> On 03/30/2018 04:45 AM, Dale Worley wrote:
Robert, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot and
flagged your comments to the authors.
Alissa
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 3:54 PM, Robert Sparks wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Robert Sparks
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer
Francis, thanks for the review. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 9:13 AM, Francis Dupont wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
Linda, thanks for your reviews. I have entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Apr 3, 2018, at 4:41 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team
Robert, thanks for your review. Eliot, thanks for addressing Robert’s comments.
I have entered a Yes ballot.
Alissa
> On Apr 12, 2018, at 8:17 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>
> Hi Robert and everyone else,
>
> Circling for a landing here...
>
> On 11.04.18 18:15, Robert Sparks
Reviewer: Dale Worley
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Sorry, trying to get through backlog. Took longer than expected...
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 01:04:53AM +0100, Elwyn Davies wrote:
> Hi.
> It has been about 6 weeks since responses to the review were postponed till
> after IETF 101 any thoughts yet?
> Regards,Elwyn
>
>
> Sent from Samsung
Hi.
It has been about 6 weeks since responses to the review were postponed till
after IETF 101 any thoughts yet?
Regards,Elwyn
Sent from Samsung tablet.
Original message From: Elwyn Davies
Date: 02/03/2018 12:04 (GMT+00:00) To: Brian E Carpenter
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
Pete,
Thank for your review. I will address the remaining comments on the draft.
> On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:01 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Pete Resnick
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Hi Pete, for your Minor Issue:
> -Original Message-
> From: ippm [mailto:ippm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Pete Resnick
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 12:02 PM
> Minor issues:
>
> In the paragraph after Figure 3, it says, "and subsequent values are
> monotonically increasing". I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo