[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

Hi Christer, Thanks for your efforts. Editorial nits:   Section 1 (Introduction): -   Q_1: s/”two MIB modules”/”two Management Information Base (MIB) modules” Note that MIB is found as well known at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

ACK On Apr 30, 2014:10:01 AM, at 10:01 AM, Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote: Hi Christer, Thanks for your efforts. Editorial nits: Section 1 (Introduction): - Q_1: s/”two MIB modules”/”two Management Information Base (MIB) modules”

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

Hi, The reason I suggested to expand MIB in the Introduction is because it is expanded in the Abstract. Should the expansion then be removed from the Abstract? Regards, Christer Sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia arc S Adrian Farrel adr...@olddog.co.uk wrote: Hi Christer, Thanks for your

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-06

Hi Christer, Many thanks for reviewing this document! We have published -07, reflecting your comment. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib/ Please see inline for response to each. Section 1 (Introduction): - Q_1: s/two MIB

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-radext-dtls-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-radext-dtls-11 Reviewer: Ben

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2014-04-30

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Brian Carpenter 2014-005-13 draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-15 * Roni Even 2014-05-12 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-07

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-radext-dtls-11

Ben Campbell wrote: -- 3.2, last paragraph: I'm still confused about how this is a bid down attack. [The author replied that, when secure and insecure packets are allowed from the same client, a malicious or broken client can choose the insecure one. That's bad, when the intent is to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-radext-dtls-11

Thanks for the quick response. Comments inline, with sections that do not appear to need further content removed. On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:38 PM, Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com wrote: Ben Campbell wrote: -- 3.2, last paragraph: I'm still confused about how this is a bid down attack.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-15.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-netmod-system-mgmt-15.txt