Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-05

Dear Meral, Based on you comments, a new version of this draft was generated and submitted. Thank you so much for pushing this work. BR, Zhiwei --- A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dmm-hnprenum-06.txt has been successfully submitted by Zhiwei Yan and posted to the IETF

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hello Dale, O.K. I will take a crack at making this reorganization. If you have text of course that will be appreciated. Right now I don't see why anyone in the WG would object, but I hope at least some people will take a look. I can have the revised draft ready in a few days. I think

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi, Brian, On 2/15/2017 1:26 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 16/02/2017 10:12, Joe Touch wrote: >> Brian (et al.), >> >> >> On 2/10/2017 11:45 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: practice the Internet breaks the mechanism. However it breaks it is a way that seems disruptive to some

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

On 16/02/2017 10:12, Joe Touch wrote: > Brian (et al.), > > > On 2/10/2017 11:45 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >>> practice the >>> Internet breaks the mechanism. However it breaks it is a way that seems >>> disruptive to some user traffic. The document is really guidance >>> one how hosts might

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Brian (et al.), On 2/10/2017 11:45 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> practice the >> Internet breaks the mechanism. However it breaks it is a way that seems >> disruptive to some user traffic. The document is really guidance >> one how hosts might use ICMP for optimization, and arguable need >>

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi, Ole, On 2/14/2017 10:33 AM, otr...@employees.org wrote: >> *If* you care about packet loss, then your only option is to probe the path >> with with >> synthetic data that exactly mimics the live data, or not to probe at all and >> live >> with the 1280. As I said 1280 is pretty close to

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

Hi Robert, safe travel and here's another version for your consideration. The point I'm trying to convey is that the jitter is real but must be accounted not as part of propagation delay but as residence time. Hope I'm getting close. Each RTM-capable node on the explicit path receives an

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

On 2/15/17 11:20 AM, Greg Mirsky wrote: Hi Robert, yes, you've absolutely correct in your example. The importance of RTM is to exclude and quantify, as much as possible, jitter from propagation delay. I've updated the wording to reflect that. Below is new text I propose, please let me know

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

Hi Robert, yes, you've absolutely correct in your example. The importance of RTM is to exclude and quantify, as much as possible, jitter from propagation delay. I've updated the wording to reflect that. Below is new text I propose, please let me know if it makes it clearer. Each RTM-capable

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

HI Dale, Thanks again for the comments. Please see inline. On 2/13/17, 8:55 AM, "Dale R. Worley" wrote: >"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" writes: >> When we discussed this issue in the past, the general feedback from >> the WG was that the draft should

[Gen-art] Review Assignments

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2017-02-16 Reviewer Type LC end Draft Orit Levin Last Call 2017-01-31 draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-07 Lucy Yong Last Call 2017-01-30 draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-08 For

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

On 2/14/17 10:06 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote: Hi Robert, Section 5 Data Plane Theory of Operation has the following recommendation on reading time value at ingress and egress: Each RTM-capable node on the explicit path receives an RTM packet and records the time at which it receives

[Gen-art] Review of draft-freytag-lager-variant-rules-03

Reviewer: Francis Dupont Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For

[Gen-art] review of draft-kivinen-802-15-ie-04.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at