Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rmcat-scream-cc-11

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Joel, thanks for your review. Ingemar, thanks for addressing Joel’s comments. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 15, 2017, at 3:34 PM, Ingemar Johansson S > wrote: > > Hi > Thanks for your review comments. Answers inline marked [IJ] > >

Re: [Gen-art] [Lime] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09

2017-10-25 Thread Qin Wu
发件人: Alissa Cooper [mailto:ali...@cooperw.in] 发送时间: 2017年10月25日 23:21 收件人: Qin Wu 抄送: Greg Mirsky; draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; l...@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Gen-art] [Lime] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09

[Gen-art] R: [Lime] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13

2017-10-25 Thread Qin Wu
Thanks Alissa. 发件人: Lime [mailto:lime-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Alissa Cooper 发送时间: 2017年10月25日 22:42 收件人: Srihari Raghavan (srihari) 抄送: gen-art@ietf.org; Elwyn Davies; l...@ietf.org; Qin Wu; draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam@ietf.org 主题: Re: [Lime] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-bier-mpls-encapsulation-10

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Peter, thanks for your reviews. Authors, thanks for addressing Peter’s comments. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:20 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > > Reviewer: Peter Yee > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Jari, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 25, 2017, at 4:53 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > > Reviewer: Jari Arkko > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07

2017-10-25 Thread Dale R. Worley
Andy Bierman writes: > Actually the term "leafs" is used 31 times in RFC 7950. > The term "leaves" is used zero times. > I think the same is true in all existing YANG-related RFCs. When I reviewed a Yang document, I was told that "leafs" was the term that was used in Yang

Re: [Gen-art] [Netconf] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis- ***07

2017-10-25 Thread Phil Shafer
Kent Watsen writes: > > Actually the term "leafs" is used 31 times in RFC 7950. > > The term "leaves" is used zero times. > > I think the same is true in all existing YANG-related RFCs. > >Agreed. I always see "leafs". I don't think we should change this. Agreed. Nothing wrong with

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-wu-l3sm-rfc8049bis-07

2017-10-25 Thread Jari Arkko
Reviewer: Jari Arkko Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07

2017-10-25 Thread Andy Bierman
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani < mjethanand...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stewart, > > On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Stewart Bryant > wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09

2017-10-25 Thread Brian E Carpenter
A small response in line below: On 26/10/2017 04:16, Alissa Cooper wrote: > Brian, thank you for your review. Qin, thanks for your responses. I have > entered a No Objection ballot that captures the remaining open issue > concerning one-way vs. two-way delay. One further comment below. > >> On

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07

2017-10-25 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Stewart, > On Oct 24, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netconf-rfc6536bis-07

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Stewart, thank you for your review. I have entered a Yes ballot. Alissa > On Oct 24, 2017, at 2:40 PM, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team

Re: [Gen-art] [Lime] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
> On Oct 19, 2017, at 4:38 AM, Qin Wu wrote: > > Thanks Greg, As I said, Delay supports various time units which include > Nanoseconds. Nanosecond time unit has been supported by using identity in > connectionless-oam-method model > “ > identity seconds { > base

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-methods-09

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Brian, thank you for your review. Qin, thanks for your responses. I have entered a No Objection ballot that captures the remaining open issue concerning one-way vs. two-way delay. One further comment below. > On Oct 18, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Qin Wu wrote: > > -邮件原件- >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-lime-yang-connectionless-oam-13

2017-10-25 Thread Alissa Cooper
Elwyn, thanks for your review. Authors, thanks for your responses. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Oct 24, 2017, at 8:08 PM, Srihari Raghavan (srihari) > wrote: > > Elwyn > > Thank you very much for your time and comments. > > We will address the