David, thanks for your review. Jim, thanks for your response. I entered a Yes
ballot.
Alissa
> On May 2, 2018, at 2:54 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
>
> I have published a -08 with these changes.
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Schinazi
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 8:45 PM
>>
Paul, thanks for your review. I have entered an ABSTAIN ballot on the basis of
your major issue highlighted below.
Alissa
> On Jun 3, 2018, at 2:59 PM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> [[INCOMPLETE, NOT READY TO SEND. PLEASE IGNORE]]
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2018-07-05
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Vijay Gurbani Last Call 2018-06-25 draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08
For telechat 2018-08-02
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Wassim Haddad
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at:
The text also says that it's fine to blindly forward DSO messages if the
middlebox isn't modifying the stream, e.g. in a NAT. It really is quite
clear on that point. The case where it's bad to blindly forward DSO
messages is when there is no stream that's the same stream on both sides of
the
I will try to elaborate on the problems below.
Joel
On 7/5/18 6:28 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
The text also says that it's fine to blindly forward DSO messages if the
middlebox isn't modifying the stream, e.g. in a NAT. It really is
quite clear on that point. The case where it's bad to blindly
Reviewer: Matthew Miller
Review result: On the Right Track
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Joel, it's immaterial whether the DSO engine responds in time or not. If
it responds in time, the ack and the response will be combined; if it does
not, then Nagle's algorithm will ensure that the ack goes out, and the
response will go out in a later packet. Either outcome is fine. There
is
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a
In line. The general point is that the document should be clear to
readers who understand the space but do not live it at the detail of
those who authored it.
Joel
On 7/5/18 6:13 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
Joel, it's immaterial whether the DSO engine responds in time or not.
If it responds in
10 matches
Mail list logo
