Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07

[Jari Arkko]

Thanks for the review, Dan!

Jari

On 17 Oct 2016, at 03:51, Zhangxian (Xian)  wrote:

> Dan,
> 
> Thank you for the review. Happy to see no changes needed, J.
> 
> Regards,
> Xian
> 
> 发件人: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2016年10月16日 17:22
> 收件人: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app@tools.ietf.org
> 主题: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07
> 
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
> like any other last call comments.
> 
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
> 
> .
> 
> Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 10/16/16
> IETF LC End Date: 10/17/16
> IESG Telechat date: 10/27/16
> 
> Summary:
> 
> Ready
> 
>The document describes how a stateful PCE can be used to solve
>various problems for MPLS-TE and GMPLS networks, and the benefits it
>brings to such deployments.
> It is very well written, with solid and detailed argumentation. I find this 
> category of documents very useful both for operators to select their options 
> in their current deployments, as well as for protocol developers to 
> prioritize extensions and future new developments. Congratulations and thanks 
> to the authors.
> 
> Major issues:
> 
> Minor issues:
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> ___
> Gen-art mailing list
> Gen-art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07

[Zhangxian (Xian)]

Dan,

Thank you for the review. Happy to see no changes needed, ☺.

Regards,
Xian

发件人: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2016年10月16日 17:22
收件人: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app@tools.ietf.org
主题: Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 10/16/16
IETF LC End Date: 10/17/16
IESG Telechat date: 10/27/16

Summary:
Ready


   The document describes how a stateful PCE can be used to solve

   various problems for MPLS-TE and GMPLS networks, and the benefits it

   brings to such deployments.
It is very well written, with solid and detailed argumentation. I find this 
category of documents very useful both for operators to select their options in 
their current deployments, as well as for protocol developers to prioritize 
extensions and future new developments. Congratulations and thanks to the 
authors.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

[Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07

[Dan Romascanu]

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07
Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 10/16/16
IETF LC End Date: 10/17/16
IESG Telechat date: 10/27/16

Summary:

Ready

   The document describes how a stateful PCE can be used to solve
   various problems for MPLS-TE and GMPLS networks, and the benefits it
   brings to such deployments.

It is very well written, with solid and detailed argumentation. I find this
category of documents very useful both for operators to select their
options in their current deployments, as well as for protocol developers to
prioritize extensions and future new developments. Congratulations and
thanks to the authors.

Major issues:

Minor issues:

Nits/editorial comments:
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art