Hi Claudia. There are good numbers for LGBT in real world populations, and
the people doing the studies are all to aware of the problems with their
numbers - there are journals dedicated to research in this discipline. i
havent seen similar quality academic studies about LGBT within the
Hi John
havent seen similar quality academic studies about LGBT within the
wikimedia community -
these studies tend to be very simplistic due to lack
if understanding or inadequate funding, and/or riddled with bias without
explanation.
so here we can definitely point to a common concern
WMF could put up funding for research to be done by experts.
On Jul 6, 2012 2:06 PM, koltzenb...@w4w.net wrote:
Hi John
havent seen similar quality academic studies about LGBT within the
wikimedia community -
these studies tend to be very simplistic due to lack
if understanding or
On Monday, 2 July 2012 at 06:24, koltzenb...@w4w.net wrote:
Hi Tom, hi @all
Wikimedia have decided to allow the list to be created
since we are addressing not only one gender gap but, seemingly quite a few,
including those that come alonf
the lines of what has come to be called sexual
thanks, Ryan
so this seems clear now: there may be different kinds of difficulties in a list
creation process and all of these
are now solved as regards the new lgbt list, is that it?
cheers
Claudia
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:51:57 -0700, Ryan Kaldari wrote
Just to clarify, Phillipe expressed
Hi Tom, hi @all
Wikimedia have decided to allow the list to be created
since we are addressing not only one gender gap but, seemingly quite a few,
including those that come alonf
the lines of what has come to be called sexual orientarion, I have a question
about the creation process of
the
