On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 14:53, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
(And yes, I was a little snappy on my nomination (this was my original rager
when I nominated a bunch of stuff from the high heels category..)...so no
need to reprimand meI've curbed my 'tude!)
I love your 'tude.
This is a NSFW photo
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Korean_Vulva2.jpg
Five for deletion, two for keep. This is its third nomination.
An admin came in today and declared it being kept because No valid
reason
for deletion, per previous decisions. Person
I left Yann a message on his talk page asking him to reconsider.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yann#Korean_Vulva
I sincerely hope that she did give consent and knows that it is on Commons.
Otherwise we are exploiting her.
I disagree that the person is not recognizable. It would be
In response to Sydney's post..
Having worked in the photography industry (and been forced in front of a
camera a few times in my day..) as a consultant and a make-up artist (10
years in that industry) I've written, signed, had others sign, and dealt
with model release forms a million times over.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
This is a NSFW photo
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Korean_Vulva2.jpg
Five for deletion, two for keep. This is its third nomination.
An admin came in today and declared it
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.comwrote:
In response to Sydney's post..
Having worked in the photography industry (and been forced in front of a
camera a few times in my day..) as a consultant and a make-up artist (10
years in that industry) I've written,
