Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-23 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Ralph Goers wrote: Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 15:24:58 +0200 From: Ralph Goers To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: As for having a Board

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-23 Thread Ralph Goers
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 1:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz > wrote: > > As for having a Board decision when reviving a project, that probably > makes sense for symmetry with the Board resolution that moved the > project to the Attic. But I don't think the Board necessarily needs to > be involved in

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-23 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:47:59 +0200 From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic Hi Bertrand, thanks for the notes. On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:40 AM

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-23 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 6:40 AM Henk P. Penning wrote: > ... This name change is exactly what POI wanted to avoid ; >XMLbeans users want (maven-name-space) continuity ; not change. >The fact that XMLbeans is "under new management" should not be >visible to users ; project

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-21 Thread Hervé BOUTEMY
+1 to most parts the only part that I'd prefer to keep simple is the Board vote vs Attic vote: this is exactly the type of vote we tried to get from Board when digging into XMLBeans details and got as answer "just do it" Which is sufficient to me: we don't create any new project (= a new

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-20 Thread Mark Murphy
Thanks Henk, this covers all of my concerns very well. On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:40 AM Henk P. Penning wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:43:05 +0200 > > From: Bertrand Delacretaz > > To: general@attic.apache.org > > Subject: Clarifying the

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-20 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:43:05 +0200 From: Bertrand Delacretaz To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic Hi Bertrand, thanks for your help ; appreciated. I just subscribed here

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-19 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Mark Murphy wrote: Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:55:51 +0200 From: Mark Murphy To: general@attic.apache.org Subject: Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic I don't know why you are trying so hard to keep XMLBeans dead. XMLBeans has been revived

Re: Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-19 Thread Mark Murphy
I don't know why you are trying so hard to keep XMLBeans dead. XMLBeans has been revived by the POI PMC, not just for benefit of POI, but for whomever needs updates. The updates benefit everyone, but keeping it in the attic makes it look dead. This will be confusing to everyone who wants to use

Clarifying the process for PMCs adopting codebases from the Attic

2018-07-19 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Attic team, I just subscribed here - we had a discussion about this at yesterday's Board meeting (thanks Henk for joining that), I think it's good to clarify this and here looks like the best place. IIUC the first occurence that just happened is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-169