Joe, the memory idea does seem credible.
I started with i. 3 4 as a "hello, world" and got the "aw snap."
I then tried the sentence
4
and it seemed to work ... except that, if I'm patient and wait a bit (less
than a minute), i still get "aw snap".
4 5
seemed to error out. I restarted the
Thanks for the report Bill. I was having that issue on my Android 12,
Chrome 99.0 phone and closed some tabs and it seems to be working now. I've
also verified it works on a Pixel running Android 10 and Chrome 99 -
although that one seems to have 'aww snaps' more lately now. My hunch is
that it's
The J Playground looks good on my computer, but I get an "aw, snap" error
on my Android 9 phone running Chrome 10058 or earlier versions, no
matter whether I use a regular or incognito tab.
Bill
--
Bill Harris
--
For
What do you mean by "under a noun"?
The text of those sentences was referenced by a noun (named 'CODE'),
which was being executed by 0!:101. Is that "under a noun"?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 11:18 PM Henry Rich wrote:
>
> If you were getting the non-noun message on web but not
If you were getting the non-noun message on web but not Jqt, is it possible
that sentences are being executed under a noun? The sentences you
mentioned would be errors in a noun but not in a modifier.
Henry Rich
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 9:12 AM Henry Rich wrote:
> I was mistaken about the JE
I was mistaken about the JE bug. I believe the code correctly puts out
the message only for non-assigned results that are not nouns and cannot
become the result of an explicit modifier. I say those sentences are
always invalid, but would like to hear of any counterexamples.
Henry Rich
On
The 'non-noun' message should not be displayed if the sentence is an
assignment or if it is a line of an explicit adverb/conjunction that
cannot become the result. There seems to be a JE bug that displays the
message incorrectly in adverbs/conjunctions. I'll fix that for the next
release, but
What argument would have to be supplied to 9!:55 to suppress the
warning if we're running on that older version of J?
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Vocabulary/Foreigns seems to be silent
on this subject, and experimentation hasn't proven fruitful for me
(except in the sense of noting that
The built date only indicated the date of building binaries.
3f11a5f1 2022-02-05 11:29 -0500 HenryHRich o Silence non-noun message by
default
if the version of source for building J binary is newer than this, then 007
warning should be disabled by default. You can test something like this,
This what I get from within the J playground
9!:14 ''
j903/j32/linux/beta/GPL3/unknown/2022-03-09T13:58:40/clang-14-0-0/SLEEF=0
Could it be that the j32 version is the difference?
Cheers, bob
> On Mar 28, 2022, at 22:37, bill lam wrote:
>
> At one point, the 007 warning was default
At one point, the 007 warning was default enabled but reverted in later
release. So it depends on the which git commit the j playground , the J
engine was built.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 1:21 PM Raul Miller wrote:
> The value returned from 9!:54'' is the same (00;0$0) both in jqt
> (where I do
The value returned from 9!:54'' is the same (00;0$0) both in jqt
(where I do not get the warning messages) and in j playground (where I
do get the warning messages).
So it does not seem likely that a difference in how 9!:55 was used
could explain this difference in behavior.
Thanks,
--
Raul
Those are not errors, see the 9!:55 in nuvoc.
Is it possible that 9!:55 is executed in your profile or startup.ijs ?
On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 at 12:58 PM Raul Miller wrote:
> He does not have such a sentence, as near as I can tell.
>
> Here's the statements which would be generating those messages:
He does not have such a sentence, as near as I can tell.
Here's the statements which would be generating those messages:
CODE=: {{)n
cocurrent 'z'
isNoun =: (0 = 4!:0 ::0:)@:<
isgerund =: 0:`(0 -.@e. 3 : ('y (5!:0)';'1')"0)@.(0 < L.) :: 0:
ar =: 1 : '5!:1 <''u'''
ari =: 1 : 'if. isNoun ''u'' do.
They shouldn't be errors. A simpler one (because it doesn't depend on other
definitions)
v2c =: 1 : '[. u ].' NB. cvc verb u to conjunction. adverb that binds middle
tine of fork to obtain 2 other tines from returned conjunction. More complex
versions handle noun forks.
(v2c #) NB. av
Why do you have such a sentence? Do you need it? I want to make those
an error, because beginners frequently create them by mistake. What
does it do for you?
Henry Rich
On 3/28/2022 9:21 PM, 'Pascal Jasmin' via General wrote:
Expressions that return verbs create those error messages even
Expressions that return verbs create those error messages even though verb is
still returned from expression (if not assigned)
+/ %F # (from linked playground)
On Monday, March 28, 2022, 09:15:25 p.m. EDT, Raul Miller
wrote:
Hmm...
We could probably do with a denser way of
Hmm...
We could probably do with a denser way of expressing code. (I can
think of several possibilities here.)
But, also, I ran into a problem testing this:
mean =: +/ means %
(007) noun result was required
(007) noun result was required
meang =: */ means (%:~)
(007) noun result was
very cool J playground process. The editor functionality.
An interesting difference with .ijs files is that it is actually a sequence of
console commands. Which I agree with as more shareable. A way to add
"descriptive comments" to a console session is with the Note command or NB.
works
Link to video should be https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_f7wUILcoc
Cheers, bob
> On Mar 28, 2022, at 11:42, 'robert therriault' via General
> wrote:
>
> J Wiki Group meeting of March 24, 2022
>
> Present: Art Anger, Raul Miller, Bob Therriault
>
> The meeting began with a short
J Wiki Group meeting of March 24, 2022
Present: Art Anger, Raul Miller, Bob Therriault
The meeting began with a short discussion about the J playground
https://jsoftware.github.io/j-playground/bin/html/emj.html which continues to
improve as bugs are reported and removed. Since none of the J
21 matches
Mail list logo
