Le 11/03/15 21:20, Martijn Dashorst a écrit :
Great initiative!
Just one question: I don't see anything related to the groovy name and
possible trademark in the proposal. Does Pivotal have any claims to
the name groovy, and if so are those claims transferred to the ASF?
I think we have
Hi.
Having just skimmed the proposal, that in general look good, one thing
caught my eye.
The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
commiters are only 5.
I am not raising it as a problem, just would like a little explanation.
I think the project would fit
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:08 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
Having just skimmed the proposal, that in general look good, one thing
caught my eye.
The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
commiters are only 5.
This, is a GREAT question! Thank you so
Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
commiters are only 5...
As others have said this was discussed while preparing the proposal. I
My feeling is, that there this proposal has a positive feedback overall.
How about we put together a list of things that have to be changed/resolved
in the proposal before a vote can be started? I see:
- trademark issues
- Explanation of initial committers to community ratio
what else?
Benedikt
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the
initial
commiters are only
I would have thought that graduation would be all about showing that whatever
list of committers we have (big or small) is working well? Having a large
number of committers certainly makes sense with a subversion mindset but it's
possibly an anti-pattern with a DVCS mindset (at least for a
Dear Sir/Madam:
Hope this e-mail finds you well.
I am a student who is going to participate the 2015 GSoC. I am a student of Dr.
Li Dingcheng who is a PMC member of ASF. I want him to be my mentor and we are
going to develop the Coreference Resolution with java. It will be very kind of
you
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:57 PM, 李璋华 david_...@foxmail.com wrote:
...I am a student who is going to participate the 2015 GSoC. I am a student
of Dr. Li Dingcheng who is a PMC member of ASF. I want him to be my mentor...
You need to talk to the developers list of the project in question.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Marvin,
That totally makes sense.
I am going to cancel this release and prepare a new RC with the fixes. I
will call it 0.70.1-incubating and start the vote all over again.
Thank you.
And thank you, Gour, for your
Marvin,
That totally makes sense.
I am going to cancel this release and prepare a new RC with the fixes. I
will call it 0.70.1-incubating and start the vote all over again.
Thank you.
-Gour
On 3/12/15, 7:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:36 PM,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Is it okay if we move them to a more appropriate location like
src/test/resources directory? Or should we just delete them?
Here's the rationale, redux:
The Apache Software Foundation releases open source software.
I think the business about numbers of committers and how additions to the
community are cultivated is a sniff test concerning sustainability. The idea
is to have some sense that there is a sustainable community in place and that
there is as much attention on nurturing that sustainability as
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...Easy: we reach out to all the folks who may have a legitimate claim to have
contributed to the project in substantial ways and ivite extend an offer to
them
(explaining that being a committer is...well... a
+1
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 7:33 AM, Thejas Nair thejas.n...@gmail.com wrote:
The Singa Incubator Proposal document has been updated based on
feedback in the proposal thread.
This vote is proposing the inclusion of Apache Singa as incubator project.
The vote will run for at least 72 hours.
On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
... I am quite certain, most Incubator members would accept a project to
have a vibrant community, if the project could show,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Cédric Champeau
cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote:
I made this remark to myself, which is that too many people still think that
Groovy is only a dynamic language. I think it's a problem because
it's not, and some people really dislike dynamic languages. When they
Am 12.03.2015 17:21, schrieb Ted Dunning:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
wrote:
* several writers of documentation (without committer privileges)
* one or two creators of graphics (icons, or whatever, without
committer privileges)
* one or
On 12/03/2015 17:53, Daniel Kulp wrote:
On Mar 12, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
... I am quite certain, most Incubator members would accept a project to
have a vibrant
On 12/03/2015 18:19, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Cédric Champeau
cedric.champ...@gmail.com wrote:
I made this remark to myself, which is that too many people still think that
Groovy is only a dynamic language. I think it's a problem because
it's not, and some
On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:43, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
Summary of fixes:
Am 12.03.2015 18:15, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
[…]
In short:
* blocking proposal on the # of initial committers -- no, or at
least I don't think so.
* killing ourselves over reaching every single contributor on GH -- no.
* doing a reasonable due diligence *while incubating* on
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 12.03.2015 17:21, schrieb Ted Dunning:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
wrote:
* several writers of documentation (without committer privileges)
* one or two
+1
See C030 on our project maturity model
http://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html
And some commentary on committer = someone who is committed rather than someone
who commits code https://community.apache.org/contributors/
Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc.
A
I made this remark to myself, which is that too many people still think
that Groovy is only a dynamic language. I think it's a problem because
it's not, and some people really dislike dynamic languages. When they
read something like the Groovy dynamic object-oriented programming
language (from
+1 binding
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which
is a text file used for -ve testing.
Summary of
2015-03-12 16:27 GMT+01:00 Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...Easy: we reach out to all the folks who may have a legitimate claim
to have
contributed to the project in substantial ways and ivite
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Jochen Wiedmann jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com
wrote:
* several writers of documentation (without committer privileges)
* one or two creators of graphics (icons, or whatever, without
committer privileges)
* one or more organizations providing hosting
Crikey, this went into my junk mail folder. Signed off.
Regards,
Alan
On Mar 7, 2015, at 6:04 AM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Dear MRQL mentors,
This is a reminder to approve the MRQL report.
Please edit it and approve it at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2015
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
It is my pleasure and privilege to open up the following
proposal:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
I've read through the proposal (rev 17). It looks good to me.
FWIW I winced a bit on Apache Pig's
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
It is my pleasure and privilege to open up the following
proposal:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal
Thanks Roman,
the proposal looks great and I am super happy to see Groovy in these lands!
As the
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com wrote:
... I am quite certain, most Incubator members would accept a project to
have a vibrant community, if the project could show, for example,...
Note that we don't care about the state of the community when entering
Thanks for the feedback Bertrand!
Yes, I agree it makes sense to start with a single user and dev
mailing list. I got this feedback during the proposal phase, but I
forgot to update the proposal.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10,
HI,
It's -1 binding from me as there are binary files (dll's and exe's!) in the
source release (in both the .zip and tar.gz).
Was rat run over the release? It seems a little strange the release got this
far without anyone noticing that.
Here are the offending files:
Am 12.03.2015 12:04, schrieb Jochen Wiedmann:
Hello, Jochen,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou
community equals committers?
No. The community is more than the team of committers. I'm sure you
understand. OTOH, the set of committers can be considered a
representation of the
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 12.03.2015 10:57, schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
it's fine to include only the core Groovy committers
to enter incubation, as usual it will be their task to grow that
community before graduating.
community
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:08 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
...The proposal talks several places about a vibrant community and the initial
commiters are only 5...
As others have said this was discussed while preparing the proposal. I
also agree that it's fine to include only the core
Hello, Jochen,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jochen Theodorou
community equals committers?
No. The community is more than the team of committers. I'm sure you
understand. OTOH, the set of committers can be considered a
representation of the community.
I am quite certain, most Incubator
Hi!
all throughout my tenure I was keeping an eye
on Wave trying to figure out how we can help
that community. The poddling has been incubating
close to 5 years and for a long time they've struggled
with the basics of producing the release and growing
the community beyond its core.
I was
Hi,
I notice the binaries in question are in version control as well [1] which is
highly unusual. This seem to be related to this [2], I also note it doest't
look like vote for Hadoop 2.6 RC0 passed but RC1 did. [3]. Any else have
concerns about this?
Thanks,
Justin
1.
Hi Justin,
Thank you for your time.
These files are test resources to make tests work on Jenkins on a windows
machine - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLIDER-201
The readme.md located below also gives a little info but I just realized
that it is incomplete -
41 matches
Mail list logo
