I believe we evaluate the community, not the code.
However, in this case I would like to look at the code to get a feel for
whether I would be interested in contributing to the project.
Ross
-Original Message-
From: William A Rowe Jr [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Monday, April
It's nothing to do with my browser. If I click the download link I get asked to
join the Pivotal Network before I can download it.
If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there
were export issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction, it's
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:42 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase gch...@pivotal.io wrote:
jan i jani at apache.org writes:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh daniel.haischt at gmail.com wrote:
Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by
On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase gch...@pivotal.io wrote:
jan i jani at apache.org writes:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh daniel.haischt at gmail.com wrote:
Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
If I understand the response below correctly you misspoke when you said there
were export issues. That in fact there is no related export restriction,
it's actually about the licensing issue. If
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
I'll prepare a new release with all test resources with unclear
licensing removed and the tests that require them deactivated for now.
That could be an easy short term solution, but I wouldn't remove the tests
just
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- artefact contains incubating
- signatures and hashes good
- LICENSE and NOTICE correct
- has DISCLAIMER
- All source files have correct headers
- No binaries (expect one used in testing which is gzipped text)
- Can compile from source but as noted a test fail
Thanks,
+1 for Geode accepted into Incubator.
It shouldn't be a big issue whether the codebase is available or not at the
moment. It is part of incubation to shape it up to an open source project,
that doesn't have to happen a priori (can't recall that Google Wave was
available as OSS before coming to
+1 (binding)
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015, at 10:46 AM, Julien Le Dem wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Julien
On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive
+1 (non-binding)
Julien
On Apr 13, 2015, at 08:46, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page:
+1
On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page:
jan i jani at apache.org writes:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh daniel.haischt at gmail.com wrote:
Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by AMD:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geode_%28processor%29
Good catch, we need to hear the opinion of trademark at because it
+1. Checked out the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked to
make sure there were no jars or class files in the source distribution,
ran the tests (and quickly found the east of GMT issues :) ).
Alan.
Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org
April 13, 2015 at 6:05
Hi all,
The Calcite
On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In
particular, a glance to see whether there is any hygiene around licensing
is an important question. Many projects in the world at large have no good
record
At this point, you should move to reporting in May.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C i...@amham.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
wrote:
General section looks grand.
We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
General section looks grand.
We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
Hi,
I was just about to update the report for the ODF Toolkit , although not a
great deal to say.
We are quiet but not
On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In
To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to
this submission. The ASF wouldn't accept the software grant until the
Incubator approved
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
At this point, you should move to reporting in May.
Thanks, will do when it opens up.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Ian C i...@amham.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
On Monday, April 13, 2015, Justin Erenkrantz jus...@erenkrantz.com wrote:
On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
javascript:; wrote:
I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In
To be clear, there were conversations with Jim (as VP Legal) prior to
Hi,
This is a heads up and request for help to prepare for a IP clearance request
for two code base to be donated to Apache CloudStack:
ec2stack: https://github.com/BroganD1993/ec2stack
and,
gstack: https://github.com/NOPping/gstack
Its two software there were developed on github by myself
+1 (non-binding)
rb
On 04/13/2015 09:02 AM, jan i wrote:
+1 (binding)
jan i.
On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from
+1
Awesome job guys
On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page:
+1 as well
Tim
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Awesome job guys
On Monday, April 13, 2015, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with
+1
Tom
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page:
+1
On Apr 13, 2015 11:46 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/parquet.html
Graduation discussion: http://s.apache.org/8qU
Graduation
+1 (binding)
jan i.
On 13 April 2015 at 17:46, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
This thread is to start a vote on the graduation resolution Apache Parquet
has approved on the dev list with 14 positive votes (11 PPMC (4 from IPMC
members), 3 community)
Status page:
27 matches
Mail list logo
