Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

+1 (binding) Regards JB On 06/22/2016 07:47 PM, ddek...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating. PPMC Vote Call:

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi Justin, great, really helpful ! Regards JB On 06/23/2016 02:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the issues around assembling license and notice files. One of the ideas we come up with was to have some worked examples. So here

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi, > One question - do the other licenses (MIT/BSD) have to be copied as separate > files That is the preferred way as otherwise the LICENSE file can become too long if many licenses are involved. > or listing their content in LICENSE file is acceptable? That is also acceptable. If you have

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Justin - this is useful. Thank you. One question - do the other licenses (MIT/BSD) have to be copied as separate files or listing their content in LICENSE file is acceptable? On Jun 22, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > At the last ApacheCon I was

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Thank you everyone for the really helpful feedback. I will work with Ranger Dev community to address below concerns raised in this thread. 1] Review and verify all licenses listed in LICENSE are for bundled dependencies only 2] The code in question (

Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi, At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the issues around assembling license and notice files. One of the ideas we come up with was to have some worked examples. So here is a small example I put together of a fictional Apache project using Bootstrap. Code is on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

Thursday, June 23, 2016, 12:41:35 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - files name contain incubating > - signatures and hashes correct > - DISCLAIMER exists > - NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE contains text that should > be in LICENSE. You mean the OpenOffice

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

Thursday, June 23, 2016, 12:48:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:41 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> +1 binding >> >> I checked: >> - files name contain incubating >> - signatures and hashes correct >> - DISCLAIMER exists >> - NOTICE and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:41 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > +1 binding > > I checked: > - files name contain incubating > - signatures and hashes correct > - DISCLAIMER exists > - NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE contains text that should be in > LICENSE. It’s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

Hi, +1 binding I checked: - files name contain incubating - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE contains text that should be in LICENSE. It’s also not clear to me if the text in NOTICE is referring to Apache FreeMarker or some previous

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

I updated the proposal to request git-wip and JIRA. Thanks, JvD On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On Jun 17, 2016, at 4:58 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > > > > Leif, > > > > I doubt this is something IPMC can help you with. As

[VOTE] Release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25 (incubating)

Hi all, The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating. PPMC Vote Call: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201606.mbox/%3c76126262.20160614230...@freemail.hu%3e PPMC Vote Result:

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -jg On 22 June 2016 at 09:45, Suneel Marthi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > >> Hello All, >> >> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting >> DistributedLog into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote: > Hello All, > > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting > DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > []

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) --Chris Nauroth On 6/20/16, 10:11 PM, "Sijie Guo" wrote: >Hello All, > >Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting >DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator. > >[] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator >[] +0

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Canceling the vote due to the .war containing other .jars that Justin found. Josh Elser wrote: Hi folks, This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC0, has successfully passed a vote for a release on the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating

Thanks for taking a close look as always, Justin! I didn't think that one through -- "it's just used for testing, the .war is fine". I appreciate you catching it. I'll try to find a way to build that on the fly for the tests to use instead leaving it static in the source-release. Justin

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dave Rusek wrote: > +1 > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Mahak Patidar wrote: > > > +1 > > On Jun 21, 2016 7:06 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Good

Re: [VOTE] Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Mahak Patidar wrote: > +1 > On Jun 21, 2016 7:06 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Good luck! > > > > Sijie Guo wrote: > > > >> Hello All, > >> > >> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a

Re: Traffic Control Incubation Proposal.

kewl. +1 > On Jun 16, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to discuss the proposal of a new project to the Incubator. > > Traffic Control is a CDN control plane that was open sourced in April of > 2015. > > The Proposal is pasted below and

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

Hi, > I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are > misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not > required by the Apache license. While it’s not in line with current policy, it's not a licensing error to list them. Several projects do list them. It

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

I believe this is the ASF's first attempt at a full microservices framework, it looks great and I look forward to helping this move forward. +1 John On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:10 PM James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down

Re: Request to review updated License (Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating))

I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not required by the Apache license. > The Apache License 2.0 > --- > This product includes Bootstrap

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 21 June 2016 at 18:10, James Bognar wrote: > Hi all, > > It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator. > > For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be

Re: [VOTE] Accept Juneau into the Apache Incubator

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, James Bognar wrote: > ...I am now calling a > vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator... +1, looks interesting! -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: