Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a criteria > to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation? Projects decision. -- The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Still, the question remain -- for somebody like that, what would be a > criteria > to be added as a committer after the project enters incubation? Let's stop wasting time -- just provide his name so it can be added to the list, thanks. Geertjan On Thu, Sep 22, 2016

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg > wrote: >> ...Please note that during the incubation people need to either show that >> they >> are eager to engage with the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Todd On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Doug Cutting wrote: > Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on > accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator. > > [] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator > [] +0 Abstain. > [] -1 Do not accept Spot

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

cc += gstein On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:55 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Did this conclude..? Just in case it didn't, here's my +1 as well to > make podling membership be in proper LDAP groups; with email > notifications to private@podling as you mention. This did not

Re: [discuss] Move podling rosters to LDAP

Did this conclude..? Just in case it didn't, here's my +1 as well to make podling membership be in proper LDAP groups; with email notifications to private@podling as you mention. (I am lucky enough to have faced the asf-authorization-template a couple of times :) ) Ensuring people.apache.org is

Re: Licensing requirement for binary artifacts without transitive deps

Hi, Thanks everyone for the input, especially Stian for taking a thorough look! On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > it's quite a long list.. obviously you should fix your own metadata so > predictionio does not become one of the "unknown licenses".

Re: Licensing requirement for binary artifacts without transitive deps

You are right that if you are not redistributing third-party dependencies yourself (e.g. part of source code or embedded within ZIP/JAR files) - then you should not be propagating their NOTICE/LICENSE details. However you still need to check that the dependencies your code relies on is

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] JWPlayer SQE (Streaming Query Engine)

No. They would be removed/skipped on import. -Taylor > On Sep 21, 2016, at 2:44 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > Are the binaries expected to be imported as well? > https://github.com/jwplayer/SQE/tree/master/jars > > John > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM P. Taylor

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] JWPlayer SQE (Streaming Query Engine)

Are the binaries expected to be imported as well? https://github.com/jwplayer/SQE/tree/master/jars John On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:41 AM P. Taylor Goetz wrote: > Apache Storm has received a code donation for JWPlayer SQE (Streaming > Query Engine): > >

[IP CLEARANCE] JWPlayer SQE (Streaming Query Engine)

Apache Storm has received a code donation for JWPlayer SQE (Streaming Query Engine): http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/storm-sqe.html The source code can be found at https://github.com/jwplayer/SQE with the following git

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

+1(binding) Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator Regards, Uma On 9/20/16, 11:15 AM, "Doug Cutting" wrote: >Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a vote on >accepting Spot into the Apache Incubator. > >[] +1 Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator >[] +0

Re: Late is better than never was: NetBeans

Hi Jaroslav, It's great to "see" you here and hear that you're willing to support NetBeans transition! On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > ...As far as I was told by Geertjan, the incubator review revealed way more > issues (plugins.netbeans.org,

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

I remain committed to building and sharing open-source software for social web data interoperability.  Participating in the incubator process has taught me a lot, and I would like the keep the project operating at Apache, but as Ate points out the community around this podling has never been

Late is better than never was: NetBeans

Hi, my name is Jaroslav Tulach and I am founder and original architect of NetBeans. These days I work for OracleLabs on Graal/Truffle project. I've been observing Geertjan's heroic effort from a distance (as I was busy with my day-to-day tasks), but finally I found some time and decided to join

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.4.0 (incubating) RC1

+1 - Built from sources and ran tests - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files - Checked digests and signatures of the sources zip file and pom - Ran rat through maven I have some additional feedback: - `mvn -Pstorm package` didn't build cleanly for me, I got test errors:

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Hi, On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Mark Struberg wrote: > ...Please note that during the incubation people need to either show that they > are eager to engage with the community... Indeed, but for a well established project like NetBeans I suppose the initial

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Please note that during the incubation people need to either show that they are eager to engage with the community. It's not that the Podling PMC (PPMC) randomly invites people just because their name get dropped, but the PPMC holds a VOTE based on their merit [1]. Usually all the initial

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

Le 21/09/16 à 07:37, Geertjan Wielenga a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> I've recently had an inquiry from a former Sun employee who >> used to hack on NetBeans way back when: how was the list >> of initial committers determined? Or more importantly, if he

NOTICE: New mentor for Apache Gearpump [incubating]: Jean-Baptiste Onofré

We are pleased to announce that Jean-Baptiste Onofré has agreed to provide additional mentorship to the Apache Gearpump project [incubating]. Jean-Baptiste is active in many Apache projects including Apache Beam [incubating] and we're very excited to partake in his future suggestions and guidance