Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:46 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > ...There could be issues down the road which means that this option is > withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were > later disappointed... Same here, having one willing podling

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

There are clearly some issues to work out. These boil down to a) technical. IPMC doesn't need to vote on that. Greg and Dan and Infra can vote by doing or not. b) policy details about who gets which permissions and when. I think that these can be solved by discussion and consensus and don't

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

All, Below is the current draft of the board report. We still have many podlings who are missing mentor sign off. Mentors for DataFu, CMDA, Fineract and Hivemall please review and sign off. Otherwise end of day tomorrow the reports will be pulled and podlings put on monthly/extended by 1

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating) - rc1

Incubator PMC, The vote has passed with 4 “+1” votes from IPMC members and no “0” or “-1” votes. +1 (binding): - Alan Gates - Colm O hEigeartaigh (voted +1 on Dev thread) - John D. Ament - Justin Mclean +0: None -1: None I will proceed with official release. Thank you so much for your

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:58 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. > > Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right? > This is about ASF trademarks. Just because a company creates a product based on an ASF project doesn't mean

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 : https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/ It only contains the following now : systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

> On Nov 8, 2016, at 5:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean > wrote: > >>> the ones you're pointing to are the old ones. >> >> So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there? >> > >

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. > > Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right? > > > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones. > > So it might be a good idea to point people to the right

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Hi, > This is a page about Gemfire, not Geode. Sure but it’s based on / use Apache Geode right? > the ones you're pointing to are the old ones. So it might be a good idea to point people to the right docs there? Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Hi, The new Apache licensed and branded documentation is available for viewing through the Geode community web site at http://geode.apache.org/ docs/guide/about_geode.html. --Mark On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if > the PPMC are managing the brand correctly. > > A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For > instance [1]

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Hi, One way of seeing if the project is ready to graduate would be to check if the PPMC are managing the brand correctly. A cursory look shows that IMO it could be a little bit better. For instance [1] mentions Apache once but has no trademark attribution or mention of ASF. The German version

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On 11/09/2016 01:00 AM, Christopher wrote: > Sorry if these questions have already been answered, but I'm still a bit > confused, so if anybody can answer I'd be grateful. > > Why is GA for podlings being considered before GA for TLPs? Or, is GitHub > already generally available to TLPs, and I

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On 11/09/2016 12:58 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

Sorry if these questions have already been answered, but I'm still a bit confused, so if anybody can answer I'd be grateful. Why is GA for podlings being considered before GA for TLPs? Or, is GitHub already generally available to TLPs, and I missed that? If I didn't miss anything, what are the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >>> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

I am frankly not informed enough to vote up or down. I remain concerned at the rate we turn out projects that are monocultures but I will trust the people to whom this decision is delegated. On Nov 8, 2016 18:51, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

I'm +1 to this for OpenWhisk. I'm -1 to this as a general availability. There could be issues down the road which means that this option is withdrawn. I'd hate to have alot of podlings with an expectation that were later disappointed. Niall On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Chris Mattmann

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On 11/09/2016 12:26 AM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > > >> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. > >> > > >> > Is the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

And here as well, with the precise specification of at a minimum 3 independent committers: > The project is not highly dependent on any single contributor (there are at > least 3 legally independent committers and there is no single company or > entity that is vital to the success of the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On 11/08/2016 11:43 PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement" > in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it > isn't an official IPMC requirement. It's very prominently displayed in our graduation

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Cos, Did you mean this section? http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#community John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:41 PM Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity > requirement" > in the graduation. It is indeed

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 [binding] On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 12:58PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > after a very positive discussion in the Geode community > and at the IPMC level: > http://markmail.org/message/z4prj62hr7rn6cu6 > I'd like to bring the following resolution for a formal vote. > > Please vote on

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On 11/08/2016 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: >> >> >> On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

Besides, last time I checked there's no such thing as "diversity requirement" in the graduation. It is indeed being asked here and there, but so far it isn't an official IPMC requirement. And I'd hate to make a "diversity scape-goat" out of the project that has created a very welcome

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: >> >>> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. >>> > >>> > Is the Podling (and

Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:30 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:10 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > I'm +0.5 for this right now. There's some challenges I

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:59 PM Mark Struberg wrote: > Hi John! > > Just signed-off the Sirona report and added a small mentor note. > > Is it already too late to add this to the summary? > I always pull latest from the wiki. > > txs and LieGrue, > strub > > > > > >

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Hi John! Just signed-off the Sirona report and added a small mentor note. Is it already too late to add this to the summary? txs and LieGrue, strub > On Tuesday, 8 November 2016, 22:36, John D. Ament > wrote: > > It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

On 11/07/2016 10:05 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> > I was looking at Snoot, and some figures jumped at me. >> > >> > Is the Podling (and the IPMC) satisfied that there is no concern with >> > people affiliated with a

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Ok, the gremlin has been identified - his names "johndament" apparently. https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup?action=diff=326=327 Apparently this is the "culling process" that removes bad accounts from the incubator wiki. It had a mind of its own. If anyone else lost edit

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

It was probably a gremlin, I see prior edits from you as well. John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > Ah, interesting, I was able to review prev incubator reports. > > Thanks, John! > > - Henry > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:21 PM, John D. Ament

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Ah, interesting, I was able to review prev incubator reports. Thanks, John! - Henry On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:21 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Well that explains it. You weren't on the contributors group - I've added > you. > > John > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Well that explains it. You weren't on the contributors group - I've added you. John On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:19 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament > wrote: > >

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

I logged in. My username is Henry Saputra On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Are you logged in? If so, what is your username? I can double check your > permissions. > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:02 PM Henry Saputra > wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Hi Deron, Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some guidance. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/ (and i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect) In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files -

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Are you logged in? If so, what is your username? I can double check your permissions. On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:02 PM Henry Saputra wrote: > John, > > Looks like the report page is immutable? > > Can't find edit link for it > > - Henry > > On Saturday, November 5, 2016,

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

John, Looks like the report page is immutable? Can't find edit link for it - Henry On Saturday, November 5, 2016, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > Please find below the draft board report for the incubator for this month. > > John > > Incubator PMC report for November

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Hello, Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it be acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following with their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding) > On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:31 AM, Luke Han wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov" > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Justin, I have added your name to the proposal. Bruce On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like my name be added to be a Mentor to the project. Assuming the > project is willing to have me that is :-) > > Thanks, > Justin >

Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal

Hi Edward Absolutely. Thanks for adding yourself. Regards Felix > Am 07.11.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Edward J. Yoon : > > Awesome. Let me in. > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I have made some additions to

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 (binding)  On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:14 PM +0800, "Christian Tzolov" wrote: +1 On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > +1 > > Thks > Amol > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > > > +1! > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Geode (incubating)

+1 On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:24 AM, Amol Kekre wrote: > +1 > > Thks > Amol > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Nitin Lamba wrote: > > > +1! > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [DISCUSS] RocketMQ Incubation Proposal

Hi Justin, It's great to have you join the mentor team. Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I’d