[DISCUSS] Documentation

Hi, Related to the muti-lingual issue but also separate since it has to do with tools. This might be the wrong list to so please feel free to redirect. I've created a lot of documentation for Trafodion using Asciidoc, which allows the project to include the documentation with the source. It's OK

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Background: I have no tie to RocketMQ. I didn't even know about it until today and I don't know any of the people associated with the project. I am Chinese but living in the US. I'm purely playing devil's advocate about a meta-point here and don't know if it applies to RocketMQ or not. I

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

There is an explicit demand for English on generic mailing lists. However, there have been language specific mailing lists in the past, but they tend to be short-lived. I think that for those who don't communicate in English, it will be incredibly hard to be a useful contributor, heck even a

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Hi, Perhaps it would be a good idea to separate user lists from other lists? I was specifically referring to users wanting to ask questions and to get help. The support side if you will. As mentioned, the Chinese users have chosen to find an alternate means to communicate that was invisible to

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

I would think that English is generally used because its the most international language, not because its the most used in the world. Thus it helps cross borders for communication. At the end of the day, I think you need to look at your community and ask if you want it to cross borders or

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

In Trafodion, I and others have simply used Google Translate (doesn't have to be that tool, just what was handy) for Chinese-to-English. It wasn't a big deal on the English side. But, the dialog stopped there so I don't know whether it was because the translation back doesn't work or something

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

I believe I saw something the other day where someone was talking about diverse languages on mailing lists. personally I think it's okay but obviously it decreases the chance of participation of others. of course the old saying "if it wasn't discussed on the list it never happened" didn't mention

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Adding members@ On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40 PM, Reynold Xin wrote: > To play devil's advocate: is it OK for Apache projects that consist > primarily of Chinese developers to communicate in Chinese? Or put it > differently -- is it a requirement that all communications must be

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

To play devil's advocate: is it OK for Apache projects that consist primarily of Chinese developers to communicate in Chinese? Or put it differently -- is it a requirement that all communications must be in English? I can see an inclusiveness argument for having to use English, as English is one

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Hi Gunnar, I don't think your point is right, one community's problem (maybe not real, but just refer to what you mentioned) could NOT represent all contributions from China, or any other territories from all of the world. This will misleading people to ignore contributions from Chinese and

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 2016-11-11 12:55 GMT+08:00 Luke Han : > +1 (binding) > > > > > Best Regards! > - > > Luke Han > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Hao Chen wrote: > > > +1, good luck. > > > > - Hao > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Qun Zhao

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Best Regards! - Luke Han On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Hao Chen wrote: > +1, good luck. > > - Hao > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Qun Zhao <9...@zhaoqun911.cn> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > From: Quanxi Ji > > Date: 2016-11-11 11:26

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1, good luck. - Hao On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Qun Zhao <9...@zhaoqun911.cn> wrote: > +1 > > > From: Quanxi Ji > Date: 2016-11-11 11:26 > To: general > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > +1 > > 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:00 Feng Longda : >

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 From: Quanxi Ji Date: 2016-11-11 11:26 To: general Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator +1 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:00 Feng Longda : > +1 (no binding) > > More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are using > RocketMQ "

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:00 Feng Longda : > +1 (no binding) > > More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are using > RocketMQ " https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1), I > definitely believe it can provide a good solution to stable deliver > and

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

> +1 . It’s amazing . Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> -- 原始邮件 -- >> 发件人: "Bruce Snyder";; >> 发送时间: 2016年11月11日(星期五) 凌晨0:41 >> 收件人: "general"; >> >> 主题: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (no binding) More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are using RocketMQ " https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1), I definitely believe it can provide a good solution to stable deliver and receive message 2016-11-11 10:28 GMT+08:00 冀全喜 <729040...@qq.com>: > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 > On 2016??11??11??, at 10:28, ?? <729040...@qq.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > > -- -- > ??: "Bruce Snyder";; > : 2016??11??11??(??) 0:41 > ??: "general"; > > : [VOTE]

??????[VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 -- -- ??: "Bruce Snyder";; : 2016??11??11??(??) 0:41 ??: "general"; : [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Hi,Gunnar Tapper, Willem Jiang: It's a good idea that we can address the questions or issues through email list.Thanks for your advice. :) I am chinese hah~ Through the active participation of the community(Google Group, Apache Jira, Github Issue, even Gitter )these years, I also found that if

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 2016-11-11 9:20 GMT+08:00 Zhanhui Li : > > > ++1 > > > > Li Zhanhui > > > > We are probably among the first adopters of RocketMQ outside Alibaba. For > > the

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) 2016-11-11 9:20 GMT+08:00 Zhanhui Li : > ++1 > > Li Zhanhui > > We are probably among the first adopters of RocketMQ outside Alibaba. For > the past three years, this system helps us deliver more than 2 billion > messages daily. Reliability, scalability, low

Re: [DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Hi, As we can see more and more Chinese developer wants to contribute to Apache Software Foundation, but they still need to overcome the language barrier even some technical barriers to really join the community. I'm prefer to use email instead of IM or forums because all the discussion can be

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

++1 Li Zhanhui We are probably among the first adopters of RocketMQ outside Alibaba. For the past three years, this system helps us deliver more than 2 billion messages daily. Reliability, scalability, low latency and the ability to playback history messages do us a great favor in face of

??????[VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 -- -- ??: "Bruce Snyder";; : 2016??11??11??(??) 0:41 ??: "general"; : [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 10 Nov 2016 4:41 pm, "Bruce Snyder"

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) On 10 Nov 2016 4:41 pm, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

  Responses in-line. On November 10, 2016 at 4:51:06 PM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu(mailto:a...@douma.nu)) wrote: > > Steve, > > > > > > > I have a few additional notes below. > > > > As a separate note: can you check your mail reply quote/indent settings? > > Sometimes your replies

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:45 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Nov 10, 2016 17:40, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: >> >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

Steve, I have a few additional notes below. As a separate note: can you check your mail reply quote/indent settings? Sometimes your replies (like below) are not using any, which makes it very difficult to distinguish your reply from the original message. Thanks, Ate On 2016-11-10 21:27,

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Nov 10, 2016 17:40, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > > wrote: > >>... > > > >> It just comes from my own experience of

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: >>... > >> It just comes from my own experience of serving as an Incubator VP a few >> years ago. What I used to do is to add proposed

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >... > It just comes from my own experience of serving as an Incubator VP a few > years ago. What I used to do is to add proposed resolutions to the: >foundation/board/board_agenda_.txt > when they came.

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Nov 10, 2016 15:05, "Roman Shaposhnik" wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > > In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill > > on this one. > > It just comes from my own experience of

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Thanks, John! Will do that now before I forget. John D. Ament wrote: That and update podlings.xml On Nov 10, 2016 15:04, "Josh Elser" wrote: Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we need to go through to officially add a new mentor on a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

Stian, Thank you for the feedback!  A few notes in-line below Steve On November 10, 2016 at 1:55:37 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes (st...@apache.org) wrote: My vote: +1 (non-binding)  Checked:  +1 checksums  +1 mvn repo vs -source-release.zip checksums  +0 gpg signatures missing from dist, correct

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

That and update podlings.xml On Nov 10, 2016 15:04, "Josh Elser" wrote: Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we need to go through to officially add a new mentor on a podling? Or, simply add her name to

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Nov 10, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:40 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill > on this one. It just comes from my own experience of serving as an Incubator VP a few years ago. What I used to do is to add proposed

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Actaully, I should probably ask: is there any sort of formal process we need to go through to officially add a new mentor on a podling? Or, simply add her name to http://incubator.apache.org/projects/rya.html? Josh Elser wrote: Thanks for volunteering, Billie! We're very lucky to have you.

Re: New git mirror created: incubator.git

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 3:36 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > Roman, > > Here's where I sent out the experiment idea to the group - > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/927db43fa0221bcf862088d495be2d15ce433c4bd20f4de8715bb8ae@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > There's

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

Thanks for volunteering, Billie! We're very lucky to have you. Billie Rinaldi wrote: I can help out with mentoring Rya. Billie On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:03:48 -, Sean Busbey wrote: Subject: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya Hi Folks! Sadly, other commitments in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

My vote: +1 (non-binding) Checked: +1 checksums +1 mvn repo vs -source-release.zip checksums +0 gpg signatures missing from dist, correct in mvn repo. KEYS not updated. +1 git tags match source dists (Except git is missing license files) +1 mvn apache-rat:check +1 no unexpected binaries +0 mvn

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Hi, So I'm comfortable giving a +1 on the release source tarball. It looks complete enough to pass. I am generally concerned about the release management on the podling. We can follow up. John On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:51 PM Luciano Resende wrote: > Ping, are there

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

Incubator PMC,   The vote has passed with 3 binding +1 votes from IPMC members and no 0 or -1 votes.  +1 (binding):  - Ate Douma - Matt Franklin - Suneel Marthi +0:  None  -1:  None  Thank you everyone who reviewed release candidates. I will now push the artifacts and announce the release.

Re: svn commit: r1769188 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metron.xml

Hi, Probably not a good idea to inline the reports, usually we just see links to whimsy. Here's Metron's - https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Metron.html John On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 2:30 PM wrote: > Author: jsirota > Date: Thu Nov 10 19:30:31 2016 > New Revision:

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

> On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not accept

[DISCUSS] China Contribution. (was: RocketMQ Incubation Proposal)

Hi, Using the RocketMQ proposal to start a larger discussion. Apache Trafodion is another project that has a lot of contribution from China. One of the struggles I've seen is that the contributors aren't that active on email. Rather, they prefer to use a forum on QQ communicating in Chinese.

Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)

Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would really like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data early next week. Thanks On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende wrote: > We have reviewed and reduced the number of

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > +1 non binding > > > > > On 11/10/16, 10:07 AM, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: > > >+1 non binding > > > >-Myrle > > > >> On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 non binding On 11/10/16, 10:07 AM, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: >+1 non binding > >-Myrle > >> On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> +1 >> >>> On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: >>> >>> Subsequent to

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 non binding -Myrle > On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 > >> On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: >> >> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on >> accepting RocketMQ into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > ..Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator... Enthusiastic +1 ! -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) > On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:41, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

I am +1 (Binding) On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1

[VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator [ ] +0 Abstain. [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator because... The proposal is pasted below and also

Re: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya

I can help out with mentoring Rya. Billie On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 00:03:48 -, Sean Busbey wrote: Subject: Looking for a mentor for Gossip and Rya > Hi Folks! > > Sadly, other commitments in my life require that I step down the amount of > volunteer time I spend on the ASF. I

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Roman, You keep referring to the IPMC board report and saying that "it" is in the report and then you seem to be using "it" to refer to something else that you want. It isn't at all clear what "it" might be. Are you asking for an update to the IPMC board report for October? That would seem to

Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

Ack'd. Please see the final draft. All podlings received sign offs so I didn't email any individual dev lists. Interested PPMC members should be subscribed to general@ while the podling is under incubation, to be aware of incubator wide discussions. As an aside, I would recommend that more

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

In addition, I'm a bit confused over the role you're expecting Ted to fill on this one. When I read http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#top-level-board-proposal it seems like anyone can submit the resolution to the board. The board may discuss it, they may be quiet about it. I

Re: Help for hawq wiki/jira permission

Hongxu: Please reach out to the HAWQ podling directly. Either a PPMC member or a mentor can help you. John On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 4:34 AM Hongxu Ma wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I dived into HAWQ recently, wish to share some ideas to wiki (e.g. build > and install), and assign

Re: New git mirror created: incubator.git

Roman, Here's where I sent out the experiment idea to the group - https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/927db43fa0221bcf862088d495be2d15ce433c4bd20f4de8715bb8ae@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E There's actually been quite a few colorful conversations about this on hipchat with infra. Ranging

Help for hawq wiki/jira permission

Hi everyone, I dived into HAWQ recently, wish to share some ideas to wiki (e.g. build and install), and assign jira issues(e.g. HAWQ-513) to myself. Can who give me the permission to edit access the HAWQ wiki/jira? Thanks, below is my info: JIRA: * username: hongxu ma * mail:

Re: [FINAL] Incubator PMC Board Report - November 2016

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > The board has motions for the following: > > > > - Geode > > Ted, could you please add the approved resolution to the board agenda? > I would be more than happy to help there -- but I think that's an IPMC >