Thanks all for your votes, we already 3 binding +1 and 1 non-binding +1,
I'm going to close the vote and prepare for the release.
Best regards,
Saisai
Jean-Baptiste Onofre 于2021年2月10日周三 下午12:48写道：
> +1 (binding)
>
> Quickly check name, signature, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE and LICENSE.
>
> Regards
> JB
Hi,
> The reference [2] refers to the three different licenses for the three
> different products. There are three links to three different license pages.
>
> https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-oslicense.html
> https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-jeoslicense.ht
The reference [2] refers to the three different licenses for the three
different products. There are three links to three different license pages.
https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-oslicense.html
https://www.oracle.com/downloads/licenses/berkeleydb-jeoslicense.html
https://www.
Hi,
> Berkeley DB uses a Category X non-commercial license, which Justin points out
> is not an open source license.
>
> Berkeley DB Java Edition uses a standard Apache License, v2.0 with an
> additional license that appears to be the 3-clause BSD license for an
> embedded third-party componen
Craig,
As Justin pointed out, while the "Java Edition" includes the AL 2.0
license, there are additional restrictions on the website [1]:
"The our open source license permits you to use Berkeley DB, Berkeley DB
Java Edition or Berkeley DB XML at no charge under the condition that if
you use the s
Which Oracle product is TubeMQ dependent on?
From what I see, there are two distinct Oracle products, with different
licenses:
Berkeley DB uses a Category X non-commercial license, which Justin points out
is not an open source license.
Berkeley DB Java Edition uses a standard Apache License, v
Thank you for the clarification, Justin! I missed that non-commercial
limitation.
I agree that it would be better to replace that dependency,
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 1:41 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My concern is that while it claims it is under the Apache license that is
> only for non-
Hi,
My concern is that while it claims it is under the Apache license that is only
for non-commercial use. Having a restriction like that means it’s not really
under the Apache license.
It states on that page [1]
"Our open source license is OSI-certified and permits use of Berkeley DB in
open
Starting Wednesday ci-builds.apache.org has experienced issues which are being
resolved.
Until they are clutch and website builds for the Incubator are broken.
I will kick them off once the builds configurations are restored.
Regards,
Dave
-
Can you be clear on what you mean by "has no standard license file" and "no
open source code channel"?
I started at this download page [1].
On that page near the top is a link to "more details" on licensing, which
points to [2].
The link there for "Open source license for Berkeley DB Java Editio
Hi all:
We carefully analyzed the dependency package berkeleydb-je. I think
what @Justin
Mclean said is correct: it has no standard
license file, no open source code channel, and cannot be downloaded from
the central repository. All off all , It does have a problem.
I will restore the WIP label
+1 (binding).
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 6:50 PM lidong dai wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I'd like to start an
> official VOTE thread now.
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below to graduate
+1 (non-binding). Good luck!
Best Regards,
Yu
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 13:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 14 févr. 2021 à 11:49, lidong dai a écrit :
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread [1], I'd like to start
> an
13 matches
Mail list logo
