Mentors needed for Superset and Samoa

It is time for me to step down from the Incubator PMC. Before I officially depart I'd like to help the podlings I am currently mentoring, Superset and Samoa, find new mentors. If anyone has time and interest in mentoring these projects I would greatly appreciate their stepping in to replace me.

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.5.0 (incubating) RC3

+1. I checked the disclaimer, license, and notice files, the hash and key signature. I did a build from source and ran the rat check. One note on the rat check, five files fail. One of those is s shell script that could have the license added, the others look like maybe they couldn't. But it

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.5.0 (incubating) RC3

I’ll take a look this weekend or early next week. Alan. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 10, 2020, at 17:53, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > Look like this needs another IPMC vote, can any IPMC member help? > > Thanks, > Justin > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.35.2

+1. I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, and the signatures. Looked for any files that weren't properly licensed and checked for any non-image binaries. One small note for next time, you should update the copyright notice in the NOTICE file to 2020. Alan. On Mon, Jan 13, 2020

Re: Omid -> Phoenix sub-project next steps

I think you should go ahead. Everyone's voted on it, no one made any comments on the discussion thread on general@, and Justin's been aware of what's going on the whole way. Alan. On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 8:32 AM Josh Elser wrote: > I'm a bit confused about where we go from this point. > >

Re: Omid and Tephra graduating into Phoenix

I've reverted the change for now to avoid breaking any builds. Once we've either sorted out how to mark these as graduating or Phoenix has finished it's work and we have a link to resolve to, then I'll redo this. Alan. On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:26 PM Alan Gates wrote: > Sorry, I don't mea

Re: Omid and Tephra graduating into Phoenix

Sorry, I don't mean I won't fix it, I'm just not sure how to fix it at this point. Alan. On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 2:21 PM Alan Gates wrote: > I found the instructions for that here: > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/transferring.html > I didn't put in the resolution link yet becaus

Re: Omid and Tephra graduating into Phoenix

sponsor="Incubator" startdate="2016-03-28”> > > must be > > sponsor="Incubator" startdate="2016-03-28” enddate=“2019-11-8”> > > Whimsy may very well break unless this is fixed. The daily Incubator site > update may break as well. >

Re: Omid and Tephra graduating into Phoenix

I've updated the status of Omid and Tephra to 'graduating' in podlings.xml. I've also updated the projects/${podling}.xml for each of them with info on the SGAs (which hadn't been put there) and on their status as graduating into Phoenix. I'll let the Phoenix PMC deal with github, JIRA, mailing

Re: Omid and Tephra graduating into Phoenix

t; Sent from my iPhone > > > > > On Nov 5, 2019, at 11:50 AM, Alan Gates wrote: > > > > > > Omid[1] and Tephra[2] have voted to join the Phoenix community as > > > sub-projects. Phoenix has voted to accept them[3]. Per the > instructions > > &g

Omid and Tephra graduating into Phoenix

Omid[1] and Tephra[2] have voted to join the Phoenix community as sub-projects. Phoenix has voted to accept them[3]. Per the instructions at [4], this email is notice of that. Unless any objections are raised in 72 hours the graduation will be considered accepted and both podlings will move

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.35.0 [RC3]

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, the signature and hash, and checked for any improperly licensed or binary files (there are some font and image files, but these are ok). Alan. On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 1:33 AM daniel gaspar wrote: > Hi

Re: Omid and Tephra

. Alan. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 10:32 AM Alan Gates wrote: > Bertand, thanks for bringing this up. I'll chase those down. > > Alan. > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:46 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On W

Re: Omid and Tephra

Bertand, thanks for bringing this up. I'll chase those down. Alan. On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 8:46 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 3:55 PM Josh Elser wrote: > > ...My current expectation is that we'd just rename the existing Git > >

Re: Omid and Tephra

Makes sense. I've replied to the discussion in the Phoenix community so we know what terms Tephra and Omid are voting on. As soon as I hear from them I'll start votes in both communities. Alan. On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 3:47 PM Andreas Neumann wrote: > I agree with Justin, I think we get - at

Re: Omid and Tephra

PM Andrew Purtell > > wrote: > > > > > +1 this would be a good outcome. Both Tephra and OMID are good > > > technologies, with respective pros and cons, and Phoenix can make good > > use > > > of both of them, should they choose to accept ownership of the code. &

Omid and Tephra

Justin and mentors of Omid and Tephra, As Justin noted in his emails to these podlings this month both are very low activity, struggling to even file their reports, and appear to be candidates for retirement. The situation here is somewhat special because Phoenix uses one or both of these

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.1 [RC2]

+1. Checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked to see there weren't any binary files and that all the code files had AL headers. Alan. On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 8:08 AM Ville Brofeldt wrote: > Dear IPMC, > > The Apache Superset community has voted on and approved a proposal to >

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache SINGA graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

rimary responsibility > for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache SINGA Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache SINGA P

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

Ok, now that the SGA is filed, I'm +1 on this. Thanks for chasing this down. Alan. On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 2:36 AM Beng Chin OOI wrote: > > A number have joined Alibaba, Kyoto University, Zhejiang University and > other companies in > various countries, and some still continue to contribute.

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

If I understand correctly, anytime software is brought into Apache as part of the incubating process there must be documentation from the previous owner of that software stating that they are donating it to Apache. Without that Apache's ownership of the code is not clear. Justin, Dave, others,

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

e project. > > I believe this answers your question about the transfer rights of the code. > Please let me know if there is anything else required. > > We will proceed to vote if no one objects. > > Thank you, > Moaz > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/singa.html

Re: [Discuss] Graduate Apache SINGA (incubating) as a TLP

t; for management of the projects within the scope of > responsibility of the Apache SINGA Project; and be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and > hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache SINGA Project: > > * Thej

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC2]

+1. Alan. On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:56 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi IPMC, > > The Apache Superset PPMC and IPMC recently voted and passed a vote on RC1 > recently, only to realize that there's was a minor blocking. The blocker > was that the version was

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]

I would call a revote over that, it's not like you're changing anything of import. I'd just regen the package with the change, create the new hash, and let everyone know. I don't see any reason to drag back through the voting process on two lists over this. Alan. On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:43

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. I checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, as well as looking over the contents of the release for licenses and to make sure there weren't any binary files (beyond image files). Alan. On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 9:41 PM Maxime Beauchemin <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.1 (incubating)

+1. Did a build with a clean mvn repo and profile for HBase-2, looked at the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked for any binary files in the distribution, and ran rat. Alan. On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:56 AM la...@apache.org wrote: > Transferring my +1 from the Omid dev list. >

Re: [VOTE] Release Superset 0.32.0 based on Superset 0.32.0 RC2

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Checked the NOTICE, LICENSE, and DISCLAIMER files. Did a quick check that everything had appropriate Apache License headers, and I didn't find any binaries in the RC. Alan. On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:37 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com>

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-2.0.0 (RC1)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Checked signatures, sha, did a quick check to make sure files without headers were referenced in LICENSE or NOTICE, looked for binary files in the distribution. Alan. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 6:21 PM Chonho Lee wrote: > Hi all, > > The SINGA community has

Podling use of StackOverflow

The superset podling is working out their processes around FAQs and answering user questions. One thing that they have suggested is that they encourage people to use StackOverflow for questions and answers given the ease of searching old questions, etc. You can see the mail thread at

Re: Does a new podling committer require notice to the IPMC?

> > https://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#voting_in_a_new_ppmc_member > > Hitesh > > > On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 3:13 PM Alan Gates wrote: > > > We used to require that a podling notify the IPMC after its PPMC had > voted > > to invite a contributor to be a committer a

Does a new podling committer require notice to the IPMC?

We used to require that a podling notify the IPMC after its PPMC had voted to invite a contributor to be a committer and before the candidate was notified. Do we still require that? I can't recall seeing any emails from other podlings on that lately and I couldn't find any docs on the incubator

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 1.0.0 (incubating)

+1. Did a build with a clean mvn repo, checked the DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files. Found the RAT issues already noted by Josh. Getting these fixed soon would be good as finding license issues is much harder by hand then with RAT. Alan. On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 1:15 PM Josh Elser wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache HAWQ (incubating)

be it further > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and >hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the >Apache HAWQ Project: > > * Alan Gates > * Alexander Denissov > * Amy Bai

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. Did a build in a fresh repo, looked over the LICENSE and NOTICE files, ran rat. Rat initially fails, but on further inspection all the files it's complaining about are the other license files. I believe there's a way to exclude these files from the rat run. In the future it would be good

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > * Signatures ok > * Disclaimer, license, notice ok > * Rat check ok > > I am, however, getting a test failure: > > Failed tests: > >

Re: Two new Samoa committers

ve also been done by secretary) > > I checked https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/ppmc/samoa to confirm > membership > of both. You (as well as the rest of the samoa PPMC) should have access to > this page to manipulate the roster. > > Is there anything that they can't do? >

Two new Samoa committers

John, can you grant karma on Samoa to Piotr Wawrzyniak (pwawrzyniak) and Maciej Grzenda (mgrzenda). Both have recently been voted in as committers. Their id's have been created but I do not have power to grant them karma. Thanks. Alan.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Ohad Shacham wrote: > Hi, > > > The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal > to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating. > > PPMC Vote

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.3.0.0-incubating Release

Henk kindly pointed me to the KEYS file that I had missed, thank you. So, +1. I checked the signatures, the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Alan. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:42 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > Per https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribu

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.3.0.0-incubating Release

Per https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums correctly, the KEYS file is required, hence my comment. Alan. On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:34 AM, Henk P. Penning <penn...@uu.nl> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018, Alan Gates wrote: > > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:04:0

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.3.0.0-incubating Release

​I can't find a KEYS file anywhere in HAWQ to check the key against. There is also no name associated with the key, so I'm not clear how to check the signature. Other than that release looks fine.​ On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 7:56 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > +1 (binding) >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

​They have removed the LGPL code. Not removing the license as well is an oversight. Alan.​ On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Hi, > > I'm inclined to vote -1 unless someone convinces me otherwise. > > TEPHRA-231 was created to address issues

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.13.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 19, 2017, at 03:56, James Taylor wrote: > > +1. Transferring my vote over from the dev list vote. > >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote: >> >> Hi all, >>

Re: [VOTE]: Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating Release

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 8:37 AM, Ruilong Huo wrote: > Hi IPMC member, > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has passed. > We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > The PPMC vote thread

Re: [NOTICE] Community Vote for Apache Atlas Graduation to TLP

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-118 Alan. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 6:26 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Suma, > > One more thing. I cannot find a podling name search on file for Atlas. > Has this been done? See also [1] > > John > > [1]:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.12.0-incubating [rc1]

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.12.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the fifth release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas 0.8 (incubating) RC1

+1. Checked the signatures, LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, did a build with a clean repo, and ran rat. Alan. > On Mar 11, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > > Incubator PMC, > > Apache Atlas community has voted on and approved the proposal to release >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc2]

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Mar 10, 2017, at 5:18 PM, Gokul Gunasekaran wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.11.0-incubating, > release candidate 2. This is the fourth release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra community

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC4)

Forwarding my +1 from the PPMC vote. Alan. > On Feb 21, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Ed Espino wrote: > > Hello Incubator PMC (IPMC), > > The Apache HAWQ community has voted on and approved a proposal to > release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (source only release). > > We kindly

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.11.0-incubating [rc1]

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:52 AM, James Taylor wrote: > > Transferring my +1 from the dev list vote over here. > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Gokul Gunasekaran > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> This is a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

release? > > -=e > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I responded on the thread. Sorry, I should have seen this sooner and >> voted on it. >> >> Alan. >> >>> On Feb 9, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Ed

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

g/jira/browse/HAWQ-1319 to address > this issue. > > Regards, > -=e > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 10:25 AM, Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I checked the licenses, notice, disclaimer, and signatures. These all >> look good. >> >&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache HAWQ 2.1.0.0-incubating (RC3)

I checked the licenses, notice, disclaimer, and signatures. These all look good. One question, there are a couple of jar files in a test directory, ./src/test/feature/UDF/sql/PLJavaAdd.jar and ./src/test/feature/UDF/sql/PLJavauAdd.jar In general it's a bad idea to include binary files since

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating) - rc1

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Nov 1, 2016, at 20:00, Velmurugan Periasamy wrote: > > Incubator PMC: > > Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Ranger 0.6.2 (incubating). > > [VOTE RESULT] thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ 2.0.0.0-incubating RC4

+1. Checked the signatures, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and many LICENSE files (wow, 26, there must be an award for having that many). Ran rat, which seemed happy. Alan. > On Sep 30, 2016, at 12:23, Goden Yao wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > HAWQ community has voted and passed RC4

Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal

When we asked DataStax if they would sign a code grant, they were clear that they would not. When we asked if they were opposed to us taking a fork to Apache, we got no response, despite trying on multiple channels. I don’t know if this is enough to accept the podling or not, but it’s the

Re: [VOTE] Release SAMOA 0.4.0 (incubating) RC1

+1. Checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked the signatures. Did a build with a clean maven repo. Checked for binary files. Ran a rat check. As a note there are several files that rat complains about. Based on a quick look I’m not sure it’s possible to add license

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

Forwarding my +1 from the vote on the dev list. Alan. > On Sep 15, 2016, at 22:44, Poorna Chandra wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating, > release candidate 1. This is the second release of Tephra. > > Apache Tephra

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-1.0.0 (RC2)

+1. Checked signatures, DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, and NOTICE files, and assured there were no binary files in the distribution. Alan. > On Sep 3, 2016, at 02:33, WANG Sheng wrote: > > Hi all, > > The SINGA community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.1 (incubating) - rc2

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Aug 16, 2016, at 15:05, Selvamohan Neethiraj wrote: > > Incubator PMC: > > Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Ranger 0.6.1 (incubating). > [VOTE RESULT] thread from dev

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

cific? I > couldn't locate them in source tree and hopefully I didn't pack them by > mistake. > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:32 PM Alan Gates <alanfga...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> -1. There are a number of binary executables in the contrib directory. >> Binary executa

Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release

-1. There are a number of binary executables in the contrib directory. Binary executables can’t be in a source release. Also, the contents of the COPYRIGHT file should be in NOTICE rather than in a separate file. Alan. > On Jul 26, 2016, at 10:31, Goden Yao wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating) - rc1

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Jul 14, 2016, at 22:05, Velmurugan Periasamy wrote: > > Incubator PMC: > > Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Ranger 0.6.0 (incubating). > > [VOTE RESULT] thread: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.7-incubating RC2

+1. I checked the LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, and NOTICE files. Checked that there were no binary files in the distribution (there are images, but that seems ok). Checked the signatures. Did a build with a fresh local maven repo with -DskipTests set. When I built with tests it failed with:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.3 (incubating)

-1 for now. Justin has brought up some issues with the LICENSE and NOTICE files that have note been addressed. Specifically: - LICENSE is still missing a few things (same issues as previous release) - NOTICE year is wrong and contains far too much text. There is not need to mention any

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Core Release 3.2.1-incubating (RC1)

+1, checked LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked that no binaries are present. Checked the signatures. Alan. > On Apr 17, 2016, at 15:01, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > +1 binding - carried over form dev list all of the usual checks done. > > Thanks,

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-singa-incubating-0.3.0 (RC3)

+1. LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER and rat check look good. The signatures look good as well. I didn’t find any binary files in the distribution. Alan. > On Apr 17, 2016, at 20:55, Anh Dinh wrote: > > Hi all, > > The SINGA community has voted on and approved a

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator

+1. Alan. > On Mar 28, 2016, at 14:46, Pramod Immaneni wrote: > > Sorry missed including the resolution. Here is the full email again.. > > The Apache Apex community has discussed and voted on graduation to top > level project. > The vote passed with 42 +1 votes (12

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

ove (and reason why) > > Here is my +1 (non binding). > > There is already one binding +1 vote from Alan Gates. > > > > Thanks, > Madhan > > > > From: John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > Sent: Sunday, Ma

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

; > JIRA Tephra (TEPHRA) > > == Other Resources == > > The existing code already has unit tests, so we would like a Hudson > instance to run them whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be added > after project creation. > > = Initial Committers = > > * Andreas Neum

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.3.1-incubating (RC1)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. > On Feb 29, 2016, at 19:27, Hitesh Shah wrote: > > +1 - carried over from dev list (binding) > > thanks > — Hitesh > > > On Feb 28, 2016, at 9:53 AM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please vote on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating (RC2)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. Thomas Weise February 4, 2016 at 0:36 Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Core 3.3.0-incubating release candidate. The Apache Apex PPMC has voted to release this candidate. The community vote passed with 5 binding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.1 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the vote on dev@ranger. Alan. Madhan Neethiraj January 17, 2016 at 12:21 Incubator PMC, Please use https://people.apache.org/keys/group/incubator.asc for the keys to verify the signature, instead of the location given earlier

Re: [VOTE] Apache Apex Malhar Release 3.2.0-incubating (RC2)

+1, see dev vote thread for details of checking I did. Alan. Thomas Weise November 13, 2015 at 21:30 Hi, Please vote on the following Apache Apex Malhar 3.2.0-incubating release candidate. This is the first release of the Malhar library in ASF and it is based on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SINGA 0.1.0 (incubating)

+1 I looked at the signatures, the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked for any binary files in the distro, and checked that source files have the appropriate license header. Alan. Wang Wei September 29, 2015 at 19:47 Hi all, The SINGA community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Calcite from the Apache Incubator

rve as the initial members of the Apache Calcite Project: * Alan Gates * Aman Sinha * Ashutosh Chauhan * James R. Taylor * Jacques Nadeau * Jesús Camacho Rodríguez * Jinfeng Ni * John Pullokkaran * Julian Hyde * Nick Dimiduk * Steven Noels * Ted Dunning * Vladimir Sitnikov NOW, THEREFO

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.4.0-incubating

Forwarding my +1 from the Calcite vote. Alan. Jacques Nadeau August 28, 2015 at 14:32 Hi all, The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Calcite 1.4.0-incubating. Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Accept HAWQ into the Apache Incubator

S Kiyama * Charles Alan Litzell * David Yozie * Ed Espino * Caleb Welton * Parham Parvizi * Dan Baskette * Christian Tzolov * Tushar Pednekar * Greg Chase * Chloe Jackson * Michael Nixon * Roman Shaposhnik * Alan Gates * Owen O'Malley * Thejas Nair * Don Bosco Durai * Konstantin Boudnik *

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apex into the Apache Incubator

: Roma Ahuja, Sunaina Chaudhary, Dongsu Lee, Adi Mishra * E8security: Vitthal Gogate * General Electric: Cem Ezberci, Parag Goradia, Anuj Lal, Luis Ramos, Venkatesh Sivasubramanian, Kevin Yang * Hortonworks: Alan Gates, Taylor Goetz, Chris Nauroth, Hitesh Shah * MapR: Ted Dunning * SilverSpring

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache SAMOA 0.3.0 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the samoa dev list. Alan. Gianmarco De Francisci Morales mailto:g...@apache.org July 9, 2015 at 2:29 Hi, The SAMOA PPMC has voted to release SAMOA 0.3.0 (incubating). The vote passed with 5 +1 (binding) votes and no 0/-1 votes. Here the vote thread:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Atlas into Apache Incubator

+1 (binding). Alan. Seetharam Venkatesh mailto:venkat...@innerzeal.com May 1, 2015 at 0:26 Hello folks, Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/r2 I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Apache Atlas as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.2.0-incubating

+1. Checked out the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files, checked to make sure there were no jars or class files in the source distribution, ran the tests (and quickly found the east of GMT issues :) ). Alan. Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org April 13, 2015 at 6:05 Hi all, The Calcite

Re: [VOTE] Release apache-calcite-1.1.0-incubating

Forwarding my +1 from dev@calcite: +1. I checked the signatures, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, and LICENSE files, built the code and ran the tests, and checked to make sure there were no jars or class files in the distribution. Alan. Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org March 16, 2015 at 23:30 Hi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Singa as incubator project

* Zhaojing Luo, National University of Singapore * Zhongle Xie, National University of Singapore == Sponsors == === Champion === Thejas Nair (thejas at apache.org) === Nominated Mentors === * Thejas Nair (thejas at apache.org) * Alan Gates (gates at apache dot org) * Daniel Dai (daijy at apache dot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 1.0.0 (incubating)

+1, I checked the keys and signatures, reviewed the LICENSE and NOTICE files, checked for any binary contents in the source distribution, checked to make sure there were not SNAPSHOT dependencies, and did a maven build with a fresh repo. Alan. Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org February 4,

Graduation question

As a Flink mentor can I submit the graduation resolution to the board now that it has passed, or is that a job for Roman as IPMC chair? Alan. -- Sent with Postbox http://www.getpostbox.com -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to

Re: Graduation question

Alan Gates mailto:ga...@hortonworks.com December 15, 2014 at 10:36 As a Flink mentor can I submit the graduation resolution to the board now that it has passed, or is that a job for Roman as IPMC chair? Alan. -- Sent with Postbox http://www.getpostbox.com -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.4.0 (incubating) - (formally known as Apache Argus)

+1, checked LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER, checked signatures, built the code, checked for stray .class or .jar files. Alan. Selvamohan Neethiraj mailto:sneet...@apache.org November 13, 2014 at 0:33 The Apache Ranger community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Ranger

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.2 (incubating)

Forwarding my +1 from the dev@calcite list. Alan. Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org November 9, 2014 at 20:57 Hi all, The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Calcite 0.9.2 (incubating). Proposal:

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Falcon from the Incubator

+1. Alan. Jean-Baptiste Onofré mailto:j...@nanthrax.net November 5, 2014 at 5:48 Hi all, We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Falcon dev list in which the community expressed its desire to graduate to a top-level project. The vote has passed with: 13 binding +1 votes 8 non-binding +1 votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

+1, forwarded from the PPMC vote. Alan. Julian Hyde mailto:jh...@apache.org October 17, 2014 at 6:49 This vote has been open 8 days, and has two +1 votes. There has been a lot of discussion, but I don't think any issues have been discovered which would stop the release. We seem have reached

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6.1-incubating

+1. Alan. Ufuk Celebi mailto:u...@apache.org September 19, 2014 at 6:20 Please vote on releasing Apache Flink (incubating) 0.6.1-incubating. This will be the second release of the Apache Flink project under the Incubator. Besides minor bug fixes, this release addresses issues raised by

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Optiq 0.9.0 (incubating)

+1. Checked the LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER files. Checked the md5, sha, and asc signatures. Built and ran the tests on my mac. Alan. Julian Hyde mailto:jul...@hydromatic.net August 22, 2014 at 0:34 Hi all, The Optiq community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flink 0.6-incubating

Forwarding my +1 from the dev list as well. Alan. P.S. Sorry, sent this a while ago but Apache has decided I'm a spambot and bounced it. On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org wrote: Hi all, This is to call for a vote for releasing Flink 0.6-incubating. This is

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

votes from our mentors: - Alan Gates - Arun C. Murthy - Chris Mattman - Chris Douglas - Jakob Homan Now, I would like to ask the IPMC to vote for the graduation of Apache Tez. Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Tez is ready to graduate as a Top Level Project. The board resolution is included

Setting up git for a new podling

All of the instruction I could find on podling setup talked about setting up SVN. Are there instructions anywhere on how to setup git if the repository has requested that instead? Alan. -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to

Fwd: [VOTE][RESULT] New name for the Stratosphere project

Begin forwarded message: From: Robert Metzger rmetz...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] New name for the Stratosphere project Date: May 14, 2014 at 2:40:26 AM PDT To: d...@stratosphere.incubator.apache.org Reply-To: d...@stratosphere.incubator.apache.org Thanks everybody

Question on Stratosphere infrastructure

When the Stratosphere project was accepted into the incubator they said they intended to change their name quickly. To avoid extra work for the infra team we set up only the dev and private list for the project. The project has now voted to change it’s name to Flink (German for quick). I

Re: [VOTE] Accept Optiq into the incubator

) == Sponsors == === Champion === * Ashutosh Chauhan (hashutosh at apache dot org) === Nominated Mentors === * Ted Dunning (tdunning at apache dot org) - Chief Application Architect at MapR Technologies; committer for Lucene, Mahout and ZooKeeper. * Alan Gates (gates at apache dot org

  1   2   >