Re: [VOTE] Accept Curator into the Incubator

2013-03-08 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 (non binding) Eric On 05/03/2013 18:21, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: Discussion has settled down so I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of Curator into the Apache Incubator. The vote will close at on Friday, March 8, 2013. [ ] +1 Accept Curator into the Apache incubator [ ] +0 Don't

Re: [PROPOSAL] Curator for the Apache Incubator

2013-02-26 Thread Eric Charles
Hi, Inputs from a current Curator user: I followed one year ago the public thread Patrick mentionned and was surprised to see the lack of interest for an higher level Zk client. If this discussion happened now, maybe the interest would be different, but still, I think Curator should be hosted

Re: [VOTE] Accept Onami proposal in the Incubator

2012-11-12 Thread Eric Charles
== Nominated Mentors == * Christian Grobmeier grobmeier at apache dot org * Mohammad Nour El-Din mnour at apache dot org * Olivier Lamy olamy at apache dot org == Sponsoring Entity == * Incubator PMC = Other interested people (in alphabetical order) = * Eric Charles eric at apache dot org [ 1

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-07 Thread Eric Charles
On 06/11/2012 12:58, Simone Tripodi wrote: Hi Eric! I tend to think that 'Less is more', that 'git is now a defacto standard', and that releasing all Mayhem components at the same time, with the same version number (even if there is no change for some of them) is easier for the user. it

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-07 Thread Eric Charles
wrote: On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote: Yes, the 11 components are unrelated, but I just find the release process such a pain that I fear to go to independent lifecycle. I think the real question is whether you'd expect different sub-communities of developers

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-05 Thread Eric Charles
On 04/11/2012 09:14, Simone Tripodi wrote: Salut Olivier! AFAIK not possible (git is poor for supporting such sparse checkout mode). So we (infra folks) will have to maintain one git repo per component and create a new git repo for each new component (IMHO a pain ..). In some case git is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-02 Thread Eric Charles
On 01/11/2012 20:23, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote: My userid for the incubator wiki is EricCharles. Can you please add me to the ContributorsGroup? Done. Thx Marvin Marvin Humphrey

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-02 Thread Eric Charles
On 02/11/2012 13:32, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi Simone... On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Hi Mohammed! IMO it would be easier to move into a Git repository, which I will help in setting it up. IMO, it will also be helpful for ASF Git

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Eric Charles
I was waiting this since a long time, especially since guiceyfruit is not officially update to guice3. It's great time to do this, as more well-known 3rd parties provide their own extensions [1]. With such a good code base coming from 99soft foundation, we will be good on track. Big +1 and

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Eric Charles
the project and help if needed. Is a mentor also allowed to commit? Thx, Eric On 01/11/2012 08:17, Eric Charles wrote: I was waiting this since a long time, especially since guiceyfruit is not officially update to guice3. It's great time to do this, as more well-known 3rd parties provide

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Marvin, Definitively need to take more time to read the doc. My userid for the incubator wiki is EricCharles. Can you please add me to the ContributorsGroup? Thx, Eric On 01/11/2012 14:15, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote: I

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Eric Charles
can't edit the wiki page at the moment would u please add me :) Thanks for bringing the project to ASF Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3 Apologies for any typos On Nov 1, 2012 10:30 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote: I was waiting this since a long time, especially since guiceyfruit

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

2012-11-01 Thread Eric Charles
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Eric Charles e...@apache.org wrote: I tried to add myself to the 'Other interested people' on the wiki, but I have not the right to edit

Re: [VOTE] Accept Blur into the Apache Incubator

2012-07-25 Thread Eric Charles
[X] +1, bring Blur into Incubator Eric On 07/20/2012 06:42 PM, Aaron McCurry wrote: I would like to call a vote for accepting Blur for incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available below. Please cast your vote: [ ] +1, bring Blur into Incubator [ ] +0, I don't care

Re: [VOTE] RC3 for Hama 0.3-incubating.

2011-07-18 Thread Eric Charles
the packages because... Thanks. -- Eric Charles http://about.echarles.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Bigtop for incubation

2011-06-19 Thread Eric Charles
+1 (non-binding) Eric On 17/06/11 19:15, Tom White wrote: As there are no active discussions on the proposal thread, I would like to initiate a vote to accept Bigtop as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available at

Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation

2011-06-11 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation Eric On 10/06/11 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote: *** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE] As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama 0.2-incubating RC4

2011-04-30 Thread Eric Charles
+1 Eric On 29/04/2011 13:48, Edward J. Yoon wrote: Hi, I just uploaded the RC4 for Hama 0.2.0. This RC fixes license problem by removing useless dependencies. Artifact and signatures: http://people.apache.org/~edwardyoon/dist/0.2.0-RC4/ SVN Tag:

Re: [VOTE] Release Hama version 0.2-incubating (second)

2011-04-08 Thread Eric Charles
[x] +1 Release the packages as Apache Hama 0.2-incubating (non-binding) Tks, - Eric Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, The previous mentioned problems (e.g., license, notice, disclaimer, and website logo/text) are all fixed and I just created RC3. There'are only changes of text, no