Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

Hi Justin, We will adjust all dates accordingly for the next release. Regarding the CREDITS file, this came out of a discussion on the mailing list a year ago and back then everybody seem to be happy with this solution (and BTW there are other Apache projects which do it this way). The

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.2-incubating (rc2)

Hi Julian We had the discussion about the build instructions before. I dug up your email from the 25th of October last year and your answer was: "I see now that there’s a line in README.md, "Please check out the documentation for information about how to deploy, run, test and program

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc8)

sure that in the future when we close them there is always a PR assigned. Thanks, Jonas Rat- yes thanks I think I was looking at a older change. I double check and see the Pom file rat exclusion does not include docker or doc On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 12:29 AM Jonas Pfefferle wrote: Hi

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc8)

Hi Felix On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 15:43:45 -0800 Felix Cheung wrote: +1 (binding) a few comments below, checked: filename signature & hash DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE build from src no binary src files have headers (see below) comments, not blocker for release IMO: 1. CREDITS file is a bit

Re: licenses and copyrights of dependencies

enses, but having people open jar files to read the licenses seems to defeat the "convenience" of reading the ingredients. If your packaging can extract a LICENSE from each jar you could point to those files. My 2 cents, -Alex On 11/7/18, 8:07 AM, "Jonas Pfefferle" <

Re: licenses and copyrights of dependencies

S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -"Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: - To: "general@incubator.apache.org" From: "Jonas Pfefferle" Date: 11/07/2018 07:35AM Su

Re: licenses and copyrights of dependencies

Since we are only shipping jars and jars already include the licenses e.g. in META-INF or the pom file, we could refer to them in the NOTICE file instead of replicating them. Jonas On Wed, 07 Nov 2018 13:35:04 +0100 "Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: Hi all, We are just preparing a n

licenses and copyrights of dependencies

Hi all, We are just preparing a new release and are wondering how and what is required for licenses and copyrights of components shipped with an artifact. According to the release policy http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#distribute-other-artifacts we need to include licenses

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi, On Tue, 6 Nov 2018 00:25:51 +1100 Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part of the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Justin, Just to clarify the need for build instructions. The documentation is part of the repository: https://github.com/apache/incubator-crail/tree/master/doc and can be generated with "make html". Is it sufficient if we point this out in the README? We don't want to duplicate

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Justin, I believe technically it is a), so I will leave it as is for now. Thanks, Jonas On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 23:38:05 +1100 Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, Correct, the copyright headers were removed. Previously the copyright was part of the NOTICE file however we removed it after you

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

using RSA key ID AA557B11 gpg: Good signature from "Jonas Pfefferle ” Odd I get: gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-crail-1.1-incubating-bin.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 21:50:58 2018 AEDT gpg:using RSA key 9C196C5FAA557B11 gpg: Good signature from "Jonas

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi all, Thanks again for voting on Apache Crail 1.1-incubating rc3. I'm canceling the vote due to found issues. We will prepare a new release candidate to address the issues. Thanks, Jonas On Mon, 05 Nov 2018 09:32:05 +0100 "Jonas Pfefferle" wrote: Hi Luciano, Thanks for

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Hi Luciano, Thanks for your vote. We will prepare another release to address the problems with the binary release. Jonas On Sun, 4 Nov 2018 15:42:38 -0800 Luciano Resende wrote: If the podling decide to release only the source artifacts I would be +1 (binding) for that as Justin and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

: $ gpg --verify apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc gpg: assuming signed data in `apache-crail-1.1-incubating-src.tar.gz' gpg: Signature made Fri 26 Oct 2018 12:50:58 PM CEST using RSA key ID AA557B11 gpg: Good signature from "Jonas Pfefferle " - What is contained in CREDITS is ally

[VOTE] Release of Apache Crail-1.1-incubating [rc3]

Please vote to approve the release of Apache Crail 1.1-incubating (rc3). The podling dev vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00453.html The result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00462.html Commit to be voted upon:

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

Hi, Thanks for all your votes. Here is the result: 4 + votes 0 - votes Some comments for future votes that I'm about to address: - Use Apache email address for signing - Include public URL of KEYS file - Clarify build instruction (need to build without tests) I'm going to release the first

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

Ok, I will include the public KEYS URL in future calls for vote. Thanks, Jonas On Fri, 25 May 2018 13:25:24 +0100 sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: On 25 May 2018 at 12:10, Jonas Pfefferle <peppe...@japf.ch> wrote: Hi Willem You can find the KEYS file here: https://dist.apache.or

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

EY directory. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Jonas Pfefferle <peppe...@japf.ch> wrote: Hi, At the moment there is no way to run the tests without setting up a configuration for your system (Crail needs hugepage mountpoint, netwo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

crail.ClientTest) testlookupDirectory(org.apache.crail.ClientTest): null/conf/crail-site.conf (No such file or directory) Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 3:28 PM,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

Forgot to add: Release artifacts have been signed with the following key: https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/pepperjo.asc Thanks, Jonas On Tue, 22 May 2018 09:28:01 +0200 "Jonas Pfefferle" <peppe...@japf.ch> wrote: Please vote to approve the source release of A

[VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3). This release candidate fixes all issues raised in the last IPMC vote: - Add DISCLAIMER - Move IBM copyright from NOTICE file to CREDITS file and fix formatting of Apache copyright - Leading directory name in tar/zip

[CANCEL][VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC2)

Hi @All, Thanks for your votes. Sorry for the late response, I was traveling the last 4 days. I'm canceling the vote. I will create a new release candidate addressing the following issues: - DISCLAIMER - NOTICE - Leading directory name in tar/zip file: I vote for what Julian suggested A

[VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC2)

Please vote to approve the source release of Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC2). The podling dev vote thread: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00241.html The result: https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@crail.apache.org/msg00249.html Commit hash: