, it would be great if we could have another mentor
helping in PhotArk.
I'll wait couple more days, and otherwise volunteer myself as a mentor.
I think you should have waited a couple more days before you said
that :-)
Upayavira
On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 21:12 +1100, David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Could clutch in some way be used to mimic Marvin for the Incubator?
I for one would really appreciate an email each month saying what
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
to mimic Marvin for the Incubator?
I for one would really appreciate an email each month saying what
projects need to report.
Could simply be group1.html, group2.html and group3.html mailed to
general@ rotating every month.
Upayavira
where it is ready for a vote (i.e. there is a proposal
on the incubator wiki, and sufficient mentors have been identified),
then a vote can be called at any time.
However, it is best to avoid major holidays, e.g. Christmas, Easter,
Thanksgiving, etc.
Upayavira
haven't got mentors yet, that really needs to be your focus. They
would then likely have a sense when is the right time to put the project
to a vote.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
, openEJB and openJPA.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
suggest electing 3-4 volunteers for that.
I think that sounds like a good idea, and I'd volunteer if needed.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
additional 'almost there' criteria, from which
point podlings are able to release. At the moment, that is effectively
'all legal issues are covered'. We could add some additional criteria
here.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
This page says that podlings are in month1/2/3 for reports. Would it be
possible to show on the page what months each of these relate to? That
would really help checking reports for a specific month.
Otherwise, a real blimey page, really useful. Thanks!
Upayavira
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 21:37
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 20:46 +0200, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...the Incubator PMC needs to accept this graduation
+1
Upayavira
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 11:20 +1100, David Crossley wrote:
BlueSky, Empire-DB, Lucene.Net, Qpid, Thrift are missing
their reports this month.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/October2008
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
I have passed this on to Thrift.
Upayavira
committers are allowed to sign them. That is what is
being said.
A blanket all committers must sign an NDA would be the death of Apache,
eh?
Upayavira
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Thu, 2008-10-02 at 10:49 +0200, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Though I'm not in favor of dropping the community requirements for
graduation, I must disagree with the following, based on our license:
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are not yet confident
IP-clearing house, that allows
projects to go through in mere weeks instead of years.
That would be a shame. I think helping build community is one of the
things we can do well.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
to be addressed before we can go
on to discuss the details of how we intend to treat a release.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for
that code so as to continue supporting our users.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
distribution.
Regards, Upayavira
On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 09:00 -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
-1 (Binding)
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:41 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
-1, (Binding).
(For the reasons explained by Craig and Justin in this Thread)
Thanks,
Paul
Craig L Russell wrote:
-1
I
but..
And by the sounds of it, it would enable those of us that often answer
so what next? questions to answer with a URL rather than a long and
tedious explanation. Thus, I'd appreciate it.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
of them have volunteered to step back.
The proposal has been updated and there are now only 8 initial
committers.
This is good. 8 is still on the higher side, but I think you'll have a
much more pleasant incubation with this reduced number.
Regards, Upayavira
fine with it too, and would happily vote for it.
I do think it is time for a vote.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
well, but still with a strong Google contingent, and it will take quite
some time before that changes significantly.
So, with 14 initial committers from one org, I'd expect incubation to be
very slow.
Upayavira
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 11:29 +0200, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
You adressed the two
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 11:49 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 30 July 2008 18:59, Upayavira wrote:
i.e. would it be acceptable to do a SourceForge release based upon code
in the ASF repository?
Yes, you know that the license allows this. BUT it can't be called an Apache
JSecurity
it to do
releases.
Can you clarify what you mean by 'releases'?
They cannot use it to do ASF releases, or to do any releases at all?
i.e. would it be acceptable to do a SourceForge release based upon code
in the ASF repository?
That is the clincher in this discussion.
Regards, Upayavira
I suspect thrift is missing from everywhere that it needs adding. Thanks for
pointing this one out, I'll get it sorted.
Upayavira
- original message -
Subject:Re: MISSING REPORTS: Composer, Pig, RAT and Shindig
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 24/06/2008 5
prompted Thrift to report - one was proposed, but never made it onto
the Incubator report wiki page.
We need to report next month, and for the two months that follow that.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
of the person who edited the HTML directly.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you.
And here's my +1.
Upayavira
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 08:47 -0700, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 2, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Upayavira wrote:
Please include proposal in this thread so that people don't have to go
externally to see it.
Regards, Upayavira
JSecurityProposal
I would be quite happy with the below. It reads sufficiently
straightforwardly.
Regards, Upayavira
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:29 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Currently on http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html, we have:
---
Vote on the podling's private (PPMC) list, with notice posted
Please include proposal in this thread so that people don't have to go
externally to see it.
Regards, Upayavira
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 08:11 -0700, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
+1
On Jun 2, 2008, at 8:05 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Relevant information can be found in:
http://wiki.apache.org
, and apologies, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is
important.
So the role of a mentor after graduation points both ways, still
providing guidance to the PMC, and also, where necessary, representing
(in the non-formal sense) the PMC to the rest of the foundation.
Regards, Upayavira
is that there is member representation on the
PMC. If there is sufficient member representation without you, then no
problem!
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
happen at Apache - they can, but the issues involved from an
infrastructure point of view are invariably an order of magnitude (if
not two orders) harder than those you see on one's own, typically
smaller, installations.
Regards, Upayavira
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 22:29 +0100, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Justin put it very well in a related thread elsewhere (permission
sought):
[ CHOP interesting adamant view from Justin ]
(Where is elsewhere, btw?)
Apache has a number of internal lists on which members
infrastructure (mailing lists, SVN, jira,
eventually web space), and start the process of gathering ICLAs.
I'll try to get the lists set up today or tomorrow (and I'll do CouchDB
at the same time).
Regards, Upayavira
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 23:49 -0800, Mark Slee wrote:
It looks like 72 hours have
as lists at apache.org, I do not
currently believe any action is required.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the suggestion. None of the email addresses mentioned in this
email are subscribed to general@, so currently, I find this email
bizarrely inexplicable.
Regards, Upayavira
On Fri, 2008-02-15 at 11:19 +0100, Endre Stølsvik wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 09:48 -0500
+1
Upayavira
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 19:27 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
Here's my binding +1 on the Thrift proposal.
On Jan 23, 2008 9:07 PM, Mark Slee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
We've just posted the Apache Incubator proposal for Thrift onto the
Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org
where people are coming
from with reference to IP clearance.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tee hee. You can't create a directory that already exists!
I set that up for you two weeks ago, and added your initial committers
too.
Regards, Upayavira
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 17:50 +, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
following http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#Set+Up+Repository
then do the job.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-02-03 at 18:49 +, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008 6:32 PM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tee hee. You can't create a directory that already exists!
I set that up for you two weeks ago, and added your initial committers
too.
cheers :-)
could you
I could be off-base, but
surely it would need to become a podling, even if its destination were a
subproject of Tuscany?
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
not
impossible that it could be adopted. However, if a project made
something like the installation and use of git a core part of their
proposal, you can be sure it wouldn't be accepted.
I hope that makes it a little clearer. It isn't the easiest thing to
explain.
Regards, Upayavira
part of the project.
So (a) so long as all code resides in SVN and (b) no-one is required to
use git, nor prejudiced against for not using it, I would not have any
problems.
Regards, Upayavira
Matthieu Riou wrote:
On Feb 1, 2008 4:48 PM, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008
work on diversification during incubation.*
Points well taken. We actually have a much bigger list of developers who
have contributed significant patches to Thrift. The issue, as Upayavira
pointed out in his other email, is that Thrift is a project spanning
many programming languages
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 11:50 -0500, Ben Maurer wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Upayavira wrote:
As you can see from other proposals, I think you'll find it work better
with a single committer pool. As others have said, I personally have
never seen a problem with this approach - people steer
to have three, but not required. What _is_ required is to
get at least three votes from Incubator PMC members for the proposal when
put to a vote.
Regards, Upayavira
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 21:23 -0800, Mark Slee wrote:
Hi everyone,
Unless my mail filters are playing tricks on me, haven't seen any
, Upayavira
I haven't looked at PDFBox (use iText alot) but I am interested in it
and am willing to be a mentor.
On Jan 29, 2008 5:20 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're getting closer to finalizing the PDFBox proposal [1] (current
wiki source included below). I plan to call
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 16:59 -0800, Brian McCallister wrote:
This vote will run until Monday, Dec. 3, 2007.
[ ] +1 Accept Shindig for incubation
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject for the following reason :
+1
Upayavira
On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 12:16 -0800, Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Upayavira,
On Nov 26, 2007, at 11:28 AM, Upayavira wrote:
I think that Someone needs to be responsible for these things, and I
don't see that the IPMC in general or the IPMC chair specifically
needs to have anything to do
)
That's my thoughts.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1. I look forward to seeing it develop.
Upayavira
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 10:03 -0800, Brian McCallister wrote:
Shindig Proposal
--
= Abstract =
Shindig will develop the container and backend server components
for hosting OpenSocial applications.
= Proposal =
Shindig will develop
!
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my understanding that, if a PMC has voted to accept a
subproject, no IPMC vote is required.
That is only the case on ENTRY, not EXIT.
Okay. Apologies. My bad.
Hmm, http://incubator.apache.org/guides
via unix perms on p.a.o).
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Regards, Upayavira
On Jun 20, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
The implication here is that, if we consider the IPMC to have the role
of overseeing podlings
Is there an if there? ;-) That *is* the job of the Incubator PMC,
and it is the sole holder of that role
for them by someone else who replies.
You could cc it to, say, the wicket-private list. That is a private list
that you are subscribed to, which means at least _some_ people will be
able to confirm that the message has been received on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards, Upayavira
Regards, Upayavira
Recommend to the board to establish Apache Wicket
Upayavira (Wicket mentor)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that can go into official ASF repositories.
As Robert suggested, creating mini repo in your home directory on
people.a.o is really the best bet.
Regards, Upayavira
On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had some recent
communities that join us.
I've no idea where you are based geographically, but if you could make
it to an ApacheCon conference, that is usually a good place to get to
know people and for them to get a sense of you and your project.
Good luck.
Regards, Upayavira
.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
against your own name.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Ritchie wrote:
On 16/02/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Ritchie wrote:
Hi,
Just saw the review updates on the board reports.
Are we supposed to respond on the wiki? or just next report time?
If an IPMC member has made a comment about your project and you have
unfamiliar with it.
+1 to graduating log4net.
is the source in the incubator repository?
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4net/
Presumably it predates the time when incubating subprojects had their
code in the incubator repo.
Upayavira
as a contribution, not as a dependency.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
I'd add clarification about 'committing third party code' with reference
to libraries. I should be able to commit the latest log4j jar without
having to do any jira nuisance. This is about committing the code itself
as a contribution
unresolved issues that should block graduation.
Therefore, as a mentor for Felix, I vote +1 for graduation (with the
board resolution including myself as a PMC member)
Regards, Upayavira
Richard S. Hall wrote:
The Felix community feels that we are ready for graduation, as
indicated
.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm new to this judging releases game, so I apologise if I'm missing the
mark, but...
If ActuveMQ is incubating, shouldn't the filename of the release reflect
that?
Upayavira
James Strachan wrote:
+1
On 11/16/06, Brian McCallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 though I'd consider making
releases.
Yes, but it is confusing if you look at the thread about voting on
0.9.6. If 0.9.7 isn't available. Can we have 0.9.6.1 as the next
iteration of the 0.9.6 release?
Upayavira
On Nov 21, 2006, at 8:16 AM, Marc Prud'hommeaux wrote:
William
Good point, but since the trunk (from which
there first.
Gwyn,
There's also something that someone like yourself can do - which is pick
someone you know (who visited you at your house recently) who is a
member and does have privs and bug them with lots of good patches. :-)
Regards, Upayavira
to do with handling
load. However, the autoexport plugin has worked around this, so there is
no general objection to using Confluence as a wiki, although there is a
general awareness that it can be used either as a document editing
system, or as a public wiki.
Regards, Upayavira
block all commit access to the repository, then a simple zip
should do the job, If I understand correctly.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 11/1/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Xavier Hanin wrote:
On 11/1/06, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31/10/06, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Ivy want to import history, or just the latest code?
An history import would be nice
of the old repo can be found.
If it just wants to import the latest code, as you are now (or soon will
be) on the incubator PMC, you should be able to create the root Ivy
directory yourself. Maybe just need to get yourself added to the
incubator-pmc group.
Regards, Upayavira
the infrastructure (svn, mailing lists, ...).
Software grant must be received before code can be imported into SVN.
Other infra can be set up now (assuming a status page exists, which I
think you've done).
Regards, Upayavira
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 05:48:26
integrity).
However, if those on the PPMC wanted some help with the actual process
of preparing the release - testing, building, etc, that is up to those
PPMC members, and maybe there is some way you can help there.
Does that make sense?
Regards, Upayavira
we dig an ASL 1 licensed tomcat servlet spec from SVN/CVS and
relicense it as AL2.0?
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/13/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how does Felix proceed now? Accept that the rules have just changed
on it, after spending some months under the view that a release _wasn't_
necessary to graduation, and go back and do something it would have done
for Felix until such a time
as we have resolved any outstanding issues.
Regards, Upayavira
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 9/13/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how does Felix proceed now? Accept that the rules have just changed
on it, after spending some months under the view
nowadays. -- justin
So how does Felix proceed now? Accept that the rules have just changed
on it, after spending some months under the view that a release _wasn't_
necessary to graduation, and go back and do something it would have done
months ago had it not been told to do otherwise?
Upayavira
for receiving a software donation to
an existing TLP.
That's my take.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is for
graduation, and when ready, graduate it to the Jackrabbit TLP, just like
any other incubating project (Jackrabbit PMC vote, incubator PMC vote,
etc, etc).
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
being mentors, but apart
from that, if the podling committers/PPMC members want you (a vote would
show that), then, well, you're in. Add yourself to the podling's status
page as a mentor.
Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Rodriguez, Marcel Offermans, Alex Karasulu,
Upayavira, Karl Pauls, Rob Walker, Richard Hall, Francesco Furfari
Non-binding committer votes:
Stefan Frenot, Didier Donsez, Manuel Santillan, Humberto Cervantes
Non-binding community votes from:
Glyn Normington, Niclas Hedhman, Jose L Ruiz, BJ
Oops. I guess I should vote :-)
[X] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
Upayavira
Upayavira wrote:
Folks,
Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like to call a
vote on accepting Wicket into the incubator.
As previously mentioned, the Wicket community held
The vote has now, IMO, had enough time to run.
To summarise, we had 8 binding +1s, from Leo Simons, Alex Karasulu,
Jason van Zyl, Justin Erenkrantz, Don Brown, Yoav Shapira, Robert
Burrell Donkin, Upayavira, and one binding -0 from Greg Stein.
We also had eight non-binding +1s.
This means
@lists.sourceforge.net/index.html#08808
Below is the complete proposal for this project.
So, please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
Regards, Upayavira
- o -
= Wicket
Searching for '[VOTE]' on the wicket archives isn't enough to find the
relevant vote :-(
Here's the correct link:
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/index.html#08853
Upayavira
Upayavira wrote:
Folks,
Without further ado (and before my PC dies again), I'd like
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 8/24/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...=== Name ===
Obviously, the
...
Looks like something's missing on that line, it ends after Obviously,
the.
Not having a good day. That was where I started saying that I'd done a
US trademark search that showed
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/24/06, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept Wicket as an Incubator podling
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Reject this proposal for the following reason:
FYI: this is a majority vote not subject to vetos. So, there's no
requirement that you provide
remaining concerns that
they feel need to be addressed before feeling able to vote +1?
Thanks in advance.
Upayavira
[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop@lists.sourceforge.net/index.html#08853
[2]http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WicketProposal
.
Upayavira, who could be wrong, though.
On Aug 10, 2006, at 2:27 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html is currently a
draft document. i think that it's strong enough to push towards
promoting it (and putting it in the indexes).
please find
my explanations above help.
Regards, Upayavira
On 8/6/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/5/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/4/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eelco Hillenius wrote:
I understand that there are some specific
process.
Regards, Upayavira
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is that a new
community might be incubated (assuming no other issues)?
Regards, Upayavira
On 29/07/06, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Time scale for Wicket 2.0 is to start out releasing betas within two
months. We plan to finish Wicket In Action the next few months - say
october
Leo Simons wrote:
Nice proposal. Seems like a no-brainer. More Dutchies at apache is
always a good thing ;)
On Wed, Jul 26, 2006 at 04:54:15PM +0100, Upayavira wrote:
=== Versions ===
Wicket currently has three versions of their code base, 1.2 (the current
release), 1.3 (planned) and 2.0
be found at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WicketProposal)
Regards, Upayavira
= Wicket Proposal =
This proposal outlines the creation of a new top-level Wicket project
within the Apache Software Foundation.
== Rationale ==
Wicket is a unique web application framework that focusses on bringing
201 - 300 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
