On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
sebb:
Not always, for example
OpenOffice.org = ooo
The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN
Repositories are linked from the podling status page, though it is admittedly
I wanted an easy way to get a summary list of podlings with their
status, so I created another stylesheet [1] to process podlings.xml
and generate 4 CSV files, and added a new target to the build script.
The command ant generate-summary will generate the following files in target/
current.txt
The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings
past and present in a single rather long page.
It might be better to have individual pages for the
current/graduated/retired podlings, with a much simpler one-line
summary of all the podlings on the existing page.
The summary
There is still a large SVN tree under
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/callback/
Callback was originally PhoneGap and is now Cordova
Anyone know whether this SVN tree should be kept - in which case maybe
it should be renamed to cordova - or deleted?
On 20 March 2014 01:12, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
I may just be missing something but I don't see any MD5 or signed files in
the release area from the mirror the download page took me to. [1] they do
seem to be in RC4 [2] so it may be they just not been copied over
On 21 March 2014 00:03, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, at 07:09 AM, sebb wrote:
Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file
to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired?
Good idea.
Add that as another step to:
http
On 19 March 2014 15:05, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
what has been with the rule that an ipmc must forward the VOTE to the
incubator pmc when it gets started, and those members can also cast a binding
-1 ?
IPMC votes are the only ones that are binding.
However, even a binding -1
On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
HI,
Just a minor thing (IMO). I was just taking a look at [1] and what strikes me
is a lack of ASF branding.
While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an ASF
one, the subtitles Forge software
On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 6:58 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 March 2014 01:23, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
While it's clear in the text and from the domain that the project is an
ASF one, the subtitles
that:
1) Apache wouldn't want to have SourceForge branding on Apache
infrastructure
2) SourceForge wouldn't want Apache to have SourceForge branding on Apache
infrastructure.
Are folks sure this is ok?
-Alex
On 3/17/14 9:09 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2014 15:17, Cory
ASF theme started.)
That looks much better, thanks.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:06 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 March 2014 16:53, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
Alex,
The project is Allura, which does power the developer tools at
SourceForge,
and we're using an Allura
Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file
to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired?
It could just be an empty file, or it could contain a link to the
retired summary status, for example:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#agila
I'm
On 16 March 2014 03:43, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
On 3/14/14 8:19 PM, sebb wrote:
On 14 March 2014 20:16, Cory Johns john...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I think we've addressed all of the issues. Namely:
* The status page (http://incubator.staging.apache.org/projects/allura.html
-
its back up now).
Roman and sebb had similar comments to yours, so I'll respond in a
single email.
We are self-hosting at http://forge-allura.apache.org/p/allura so that
is really our home page. It has a clear download link, and git browse
link, and the text doesn't equate the project
, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The website does not appear to have a License link.
This must link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/
On 13 March 2014 12:41, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi (I flipped the reply-to to be general@i.a.o)
+1 (binding, Mentor)
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 13
.
On 14 March 2014 13:22, Klevenz, Stephan stephan.klev...@sap.com wrote:
Ok, it's all changed. Can you please have a look again?
-- Stephan
On 14.03.14 13:35, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, but although the license is an ASF license, what's important
to end-users is the license
All looks good now.
Sorry, it was a cache issue.
Thanks for the very prompt attention to these matters.
On 14 March 2014 14:06, Klevenz, Stephan stephan.klev...@sap.com wrote:
Hi Sebb,
see my comments below.
Stephan
On 14.03.14 14:46, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Home page looks good
that are missing from the site.
See http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html
In particular
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#navigation
With these changes, we are hopeful that we can proceed with and pass the
graduation vote.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 8:18 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com
The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines.
The page footer does not mention Apache Allura and Allura as trademarks
Also the footer date is still 2011
The License link must point to http://www.apache.org/licenses/ - not
to a local copy of the license.
The intro.
Also, the podling status page is not complete.
On 13 March 2014 18:34, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines.
The page footer does not mention Apache Allura and Allura as trademarks
Also the footer date is still 2011
The License
The website does not appear to have a License link.
This must link to http://www.apache.org/licenses/
On 13 March 2014 12:41, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi (I flipped the reply-to to be general@i.a.o)
+1 (binding, Mentor)
Regards,
Dave
On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:17 AM, Florian
, it may be difficult to defend Allura as a trademark of
the ASF.
--
Rich Bowen, mobile edition
rbo...@rcbowen.com
Please forgive top posting.
On Mar 13, 2014 2:35 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Allura website does not appear to follow the branding guidelines.
The page footer does
On 7 March 2014 20:16, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
Hi everyone,
The Apache Allura podling has discussed and voted to graduate from the
incubator. We've made two releases, added several PPMC members, have been
working with Infra to set up forge-allura.a.o, etc. We would now like
On 5 March 2014 19:26, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
The ODF Toolkit website [1] does not indicate which ones are the mentors.
Do you mind just listing them in this thread for quick FYI?
The canonical location for podling status is here:
On 28 February 2014 19:48, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1
One note is that the signatures given say sha1, but you actually have use
openssl sha to get the same values. If you do sha1sum (which was my first
assumption anyway) you get a different non-matching values. You might
On 28 February 2014 21:44, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, Sebb. I went ahead and moved the original SHA into
.sha file and re-generated the SHA1 into the .sha1 file.
@Alan, @sebb, would either of you mind verifying the modified files?
.sha1 now looks OK
On 23 February 2014 19:31, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.3.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the
second release for Tez.
GIT source tag:
On 24 February 2014 18:25, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Henry Saputra
henry.sapu...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you saying it is ok to contain compiled executed binaries if they
were signed?
I did not take a position on that.
The how-to-release
On 23 February 2014 06:58, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Sebb,
Thank you for your checking. We updated the incubation status of Tajo as
follows:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/tajo.xml
The first item of distribution rights was verified
On 22 February 2014 01:12, James Taylor jamestay...@apache.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 2.2.3 incubating. Phoenix is a
SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed as a
JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase
The Incubation status page has one incomplete section:
Verify distribution rights
Seems to me it is fundamental to ensure that this has been done before
considering graduation.
On 22 February 2014 03:44, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Everyone,
After a
BTW, the copy to the dev@tajo list bounced, as I'm not subscribed.
On 22 February 2014 10:24, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The Incubation status page has one incomplete section:
Verify distribution rights
Seems to me it is fundamental to ensure that this has been done before
considering
On 16 February 2014 08:24, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the release vote for Apache Celix, version 1.0.0.incubating
This release has already been approved by:
+1 Marcel Offermans (marrs) (binding)
+1 Karl Pauls (pauls) (binding)
+1 Gerrit Binnenmars (non-binding)
On 15 February 2014 16:44, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi sebb,
What specifically needs to be done to correct the NOTICE file?
Should the references to Nathan Marz and Yahoo! be removed?
As I already wrote, this depends on the exact license(s) of the
file(s) involved.
Thanks
to downstream
consumers so it is important not to include anything that is not
required.
On 14 February 2014 17:31, Suresh Srinivas sur...@hortonworks.com wrote:
+1 (binding) from me.
Sebb, can you please answer the question related to the NOTICE file. I
think while it may not be necessary
NOTICE file still refers to 2013.
On 13 February 2014 01:06, Dave Brondsema d...@brondsema.net wrote:
Hi everyone,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.1.0 incubating. This will be our
second release in the incubator. Allura is forge software for the development
of software
On 13 February 2014 07:00, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a call for a vote to release Apache Storm (incubating) version
0.9.1. This will be the first release of Apache Storm.
A vote was held on the developer mailing list, and passed with 9 +1 votes (6
binding, 3
On 9 February 2014 06:47, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 7:42 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
WDYT?
Non-trivial; maintaining the meta-data needed to accurately generate
the NOTICE file is likely to require more effort than writing the
NOTICE file itself
I think it would be better to start a new thread with the updated text.
Also, the two scope descriptions are slightly different:
related to fast and flexible large-scale data analysis
on clusters.
v.
related to efficient cluster management, resource isolation
and sharing across distributed
On 9 February 2014 17:11, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Thanks Matei and sebb.
Starting a new thread and collecting the VOTEs all over again would be
time consuming.
So?
Better to than being confusing, as the current thread has become.
Also it may
The knox incubation status page website link generates a 404.
On 7 February 2014 04:49, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Everyone,
The Apache Knox Incubating podling has VOTEd to graduate from the
Incubator.
The community VOTE has passed below with the provided tallies. The
On 8 February 2014 16:49, Alan Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
Do you think it would be helpful if we had a tool that generated these files?
It could work like a command line wizard that prompts the person for
licensing information and then generates a valid disclaimer, notice, etc.
On 9 February 2014 03:26, Chris Mattmann mattm...@apache.org wrote:
Any idea why Sebb?
This page exists:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/kno
x.xml
This includes:
a
href=http://incubator.apache.org/knox/;http://incubator.apache.org/knox//a
which does
On 4 February 2014 20:26, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Craig,
Thanks for the list, I'm following up with these folks to get them accounts.
I think some people filed an ICLA but never received an account and were thus
never added to the repo. A couple of questions:
-
On 1 February 2014 02:04, Matei Zaharia matei.zaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The Apache Spark community has VOTEd to graduate from the Apache incubator
(vote thread: http://s.apache.org/kq, discussion thread:
http://s.apache.org/aEQ).
I'm now calling an official IPMC VOTE to make this
It would help to know what was the latest commit in the backup.
Can then in theory check the commit e-mails to see what occurred
since, and recover any missing files from archive.a.o (presumably)
On 26 January 2014 23:17, Joseph Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unfortunately we had to
The voting status page shows recently closed votes.
All of these have status Resolved
What does this status actually mean?
Does it mean that the vote thread has been closed?
If so, then the column in the table seems redundant as it will never
show anything else.
Jenny ?
On 13 January 2014 22:21, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Too many people will read that as Jena, the city in Thuringia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jena
-1
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz
:
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:27 PM, lars hofhansl la...@apache.org wrote:
my username is LarsHofhansl
It looks like sebb has whitelisted both you and Andrew. Thanks, sebb!
Marvin Humphrey
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general
Done
On 7 January 2014 15:15, Charles Simpson csimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Could I have wiki write access for CharlesSimpson to contribute to the Hoya
incubator proposal?
Thanks,
Charles
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Done
On 3 January 2014 11:54, Steve Loughran ste...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,,
I want to start a proposal for incubating my Hoya work. Can I have edit
permissions for SteveLoughran?
TIA,
steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 2 January 2014 10:28, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
just a short message to let you know i moved the log4cxx tree to the
incubation tree and committed this auth:
This has caused a problem for the projects.apache.org site.
Please update the location of the DOAP.
On 23 December 2013 05:50, David Crossley cross...@apache.org wrote:
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
Greg Trasuk wrote:
Thanks everyone for the input. To summarize, it appears that the consensus
argument is:
- Jar files are not prohibited by policy in project repositories (svn),
although
On 23 December 2013 15:28, Kevin Minder kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I was thinking that the real problem is that each new project is forced to
rediscover the right thing to do each time. From my POV there really aren't
that many licenses out there. If there were just a wiki that
On 24 December 2013 00:03, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, DeltaSpike got a ticket to clean up the old dist area in SVN
from when it was a podling. Since we have everything tagged in git,
it's not a big deal to recreate the release in case something goes
wrong,
On 19 December 2013 18:26, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com wrote:
But at the end, when a podling prepare a release there should not
include jar files as part of the source release artifacts to be VOTED
on, is this correct?
I think that depends on what the jar files are.
For example.
be
fine?
Again, that's ambiguous.
I would not expect to find jars of the project source in source releases.
Note that the Compress test jars were manually created on various
different systems.
- Henry
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:34 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2013 18:26, Henry
On 18 December 2013 22:49, Matthew Hayes mha...@linkedin.com wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to share our draft ASF incubation proposal for DataFu, a library
that makes it easier to solve data problems in Hadoop and high level
languages based on it.
I am the only person to think that the last
we came up with the name a couple years ago, it was inspired by kung
fu, in a playful way as Roman mentioned. Sort of like saying your Java Fu
or Python Fu is excellent.
-Matt
From: sebb [seb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 3:57 PM
On 14 December 2013 03:13, Patrick Wendell pwend...@gmail.com wrote:
Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Spark
(incubating) version 0.8.1.
The tag to be voted on is v0.8.1-incubating (commit b87d31d):
Just discovered another important aspect of a release that is often overlooked.
The current source release artifacts must be released via the ASF
mirroring system.
Download pages must not point directly to the ASF servers; they must
use the mirror CGI scripts
Also old releases must not be left on
On 5 December 2013 10:37, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...3.6 Release consists of source code only,
On 29 November 2013 10:21, Rahul Sharma rahul0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
(incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
mailing list and the community has approved the third release
candidate(RC2) for
Duplicated message.
I already responded to the other copy in the thread
On 2 December 2013 20:11, Kevin Minder kevin.min...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Sebb,
Thanks for your careful review. I'd like your continued insight into two
specific issues that you have raised.
WRT the NOTICE files
On 2 December 2013 13:52, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
...In response to Bertrand's proposal at http://s.apache.org/awz, I've
created
a draft release verification checklist:
On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0
-1's or +0's and now
requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org.
On 2 December 2013 20:17, Larry McCay lmc...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Thank you again, Sebb.
I am noting your new findings here and will fix them asap for the next
release.
I assume that your lack of an actual vote indicates that these fixes can be
made in the next release and that you
On 2 December 2013 20:44, Kevin Minder kmin...@apache.org wrote:
Sebb,
Thanks for your careful review. I'd like your continued insight into two
specific issues that you have raised.
WRT the NOTICE files in root vs gatway-release/home, this is actually an
issue that I struggled with when
On 1 December 2013 19:09, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:33 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure I understand why the checklist needs to be specific.
The checklist should include only items which might block the release of the
artifacts under
I'm not sure why the Incubator needs to be involved at all here.
On 30 November 2013 19:30, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
zero feedback? :-)
On 28 Nov 2013, at 10:50, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Dear Incubator people,
I just added a new proposal for the incubation of
On 29 November 2013 21:00, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:13 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
The NL files also apply to the SCM tree;
Yes, true. Here's a message from Doug Cutting to legal-discuss@apache
on the subject: http://s.apache.org/9r7
SNAPSHOT releases are temporary, so I suggest you just delete any that
have been uploaded to to ASF snapshot repo.
Alternatively, change the version to 3.2.1-SNAPSHOT
On 28 November 2013 16:07, Sergio Fernández
sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at wrote:
Hi,
in Marmotta we're having now the
On 27 November 2013 20:45, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Greets,
In response to Bertrand's proposal at http://s.apache.org/awz, I've created
a draft release verification checklist:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReleaseChecklist
It should be emphasized that completing
On 26 November 2013 00:33, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks,
I have created a tez-0.2.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). This is the
first release for Tez. Therefore, please do not be gentle.
GIT source tag:
On 26 November 2013 22:21, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the review, Sebb,
Have already updated NOTICE.txt in the master branch for future releases and
made a note of the other points in our how to release guide.
Do you recommended starting a new VOTE thread for the re
On 19 November 2013 08:29, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...
My guess is that Lazy Majority is used because Majority implies more than
50
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.7.0-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our fourth
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management framework
On 19 November 2013 02:50, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache
Helix 0.6.2-incubating. This is the first release candidate of our third
release at Apache.
Apache Helix is a generic cluster management
I see that 0.7.0 has been released.
However there was no [VOTE][RESULT] mail as far as I can tell.
On 23 November 2013 14:36, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 November 2013 07:48, Zhen Zhang zzh...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
This is to call for a vote on releasing the following candidate
On 20 November 2013 13:45, Rahul Sharma rahul0...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to call for a vote for Apache Hadoop Development Tools
(incubating), version 0.0.1.incubating. The vote has happened of the dev
mailing list and the community has approved the second release
candidate(RC1)
On 20 November 2013 16:09, larry mccay larry.mc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello All,
This is a call for a vote on Apache Knox Gateway 0.3.1 incubating.
A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 3 +1's, and 0
-1's or +0's and now
requires a vote on general@incubator.apache.org.
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=d12177168347c9253f3b37946c06a7175f8a1997
The parent directory doesn't actually contain any artifacts
On 23 November 2013 20:00, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we
] helix-0.7.0-incubating
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:00:09 -0800
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h=37c20e79d0e132710f0fa0e5e8dbdb95b2e639ff
The parent project doesn't produce any binary artifacts that we release. Do
] helix-0.6.2-incubating
From: seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h
] helix-0.6.2-incubating
From: seb...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On 23 November 2013 19:57, Kanak Biscuitwala kana...@hotmail.com wrote:
sebb, I fixed the tag to include NOTICE here:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-helix.git;a=tag;h
On 10 November 2013 08:00, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
IMO, there are two problems:
1) We're trying to train folks to manage IP for their community but they
have to seek approval from folks are aren't as vested in their community.
My analogy is telling a new city council member:
On 9 November 2013 12:17, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there such a concept as Lazy Majority ?
Yes many Apache projects define it (eg Ant, Kafka, Hadoop, Pig, Hive and
others ) as does Apache HTTP. [1]
Lazy majority decides each issue in the release plan.
The phrase
On 9 November 2013 07:06, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi,
Someday I will get back to improving the Voting and Glossary pages, but
meanwhile, the Apache Flex PMC is still trying to construct a set of
bylaws and we are currently discussing whether there is a difference
between Majority
What is your Wiki login name?
On 6 November 2013 00:55, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm requesting access to the incubator wiki in order to update the storm
podling monthly board report.
Thanks in advance.
P. Taylor Goetz
Software Architect
Health Market Science
The
On 31 October 2013 11:54, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
This is the third candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 4 binding +1s and no -1.
Release git tag is at:
In which case, maybe consider the related words:
Apache Warp
Apache Weft
Just a thought.
On 29 October 2013 22:14, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
And Apache Wave too (which is what I first saw before I read the title
more carefully).
Upayavira
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013, at 09:12 PM, Matt
On 27 October 2013 07:40, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi folks
This is the first release candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
The PPMC vote [1][2] was passed with 5 binding +1s and no -1.
Release git tag is at:
On 2 October 2013 21:34, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
I would like to propose a rewrite of [1] by borrowing heavily from [2]
but
On 1 October 2013 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release has been voted by the Kalumet podling
PMC.
I forward the release to the Incubator for final vote. Please find the
RELEASE NOTES and staging repository in the original
On 30 September 2013 11:17, Sebastian Schaffert sschaff...@apache.org wrote:
Dear all,
After several months of work since the last incubating release
(3.0.0-incubating) in April, we are now ready to release version
3.1.0-incubating. We fixed all the remaining issues that have been
discussed
archives.
For example:
apache-kalumet-0.6-incubating-src.zip
MD5: 5664ebc70172b3b66f17d3a3db48594d
Thanks again Seb for the reminder,
Regards
JB
On 10/01/2013 06:55 PM, sebb wrote:
On 1 October 2013 08:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi all,
Apache Kalumet 0.6
On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote on Apache MRQL 0.9.0 incubating. MRQL is a
query processing and optimization system for large-scale, distributed
data analysis, built on top of Apache Hadoop, Hama, and Spark.
This is our
.
If there is a need to provide a bundled binary containing 3rd party
jars, that is normally done in the zip/tar.gz archives containing the
various components as individual jars.
Thanks
Leonidas Fegaras
On Sep 26, 2013, at 11:45 AM, sebb wrote:
On 24 September 2013 13:44, Leonidas Fegaras fega
On 24 September 2013 10:05, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I closed LEGAL-178 with the resolution Not A Problem, which is quite
different to a resolution of Fixed or Resolved or Answered.
From my investigation, things like the text of the AL and various posts in
the mailing lists over
601 - 700 of 1541 matches
Mail list logo
