Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-20 Thread Rich Bowen
You may wish to listen to the FeatherCast interview about Stonehenge, if you're one of the folks that tries to follow the list, but didn't really catch what this project is about. --Rich -- In America, through pressure of conformity, there is freedom of choice, but nothing to choose

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-20 Thread Paul Fremantle
http://feathercast.org/?p=68 ! Thanks very much Rich for posting this. Paul On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You may wish to listen to the FeatherCast interview about Stonehenge, if you're one of the folks that tries to follow the list, but didn't really

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-18 Thread Paul Fremantle
Thanks! I will update the list. Paul On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Rodent of Unusual Size [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1, and I volunteer to be a mentor. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-17 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
+1, and I volunteer to be a mentor. -- #kenP-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ Millennium hand and shrimp! - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-16 Thread Paul Fremantle
And of course, my +1. Paul On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-16 Thread Danese Cooper
Mine too. Sorry to be tardy, but since I offered to mentor maybe my binding +1 was implicit already. Sent from my phone On Nov 16, 2008, at 10:06 AM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And of course, my +1. Paul On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:35 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-15 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-14 Thread Paul Fremantle
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:49 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just two concerns... Is it anticipated this will graduate into the WS TLP? If so, has WS voted to sponsor the project into incubation? We would like to leave this open during the initial graduation. I think this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
+1 Dan On Thursday 13 November 2008 12:41:56 pm Paul Fremantle wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-14 Thread Deepal jayasinghe
+1 Thank you! Deepal +1 Dan On Thursday 13 November 2008 12:41:56 pm Paul Fremantle wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-14 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Thursday 13 November 2008 10:49:02 pm William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Just two concerns... The project already uses core libraries from the Apache WS project including Apache Axis2/Java, Rampart and Sandesha2. In addition, the PHP, Perl, and Python versions use the Apache Axis2/C

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-14 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Paul Fremantle wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:49 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just two concerns... Is it anticipated this will graduate into the WS TLP? If so, has WS voted to sponsor the project into incubation? We would like to leave this open during the initial

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-14 Thread Craig L Russell
+1 Craig On Nov 13, 2008, at 9:41 AM, Paul Fremantle wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors still

[VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Paul Fremantle
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal Apache process of course

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Glen Daniels
Paul Fremantle wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ...Please vote +1 to accept, or -1 with reasons to not accept as a podling... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Niall Pemberton
+1 Niall On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or

RE: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Kamaljit Bath
+1 Kamal -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:51 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator +1 Niall On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
+1. Paul Fremantle wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Just two concerns... The project already uses core libraries from the Apache WS project including Apache Axis2/Java, Rampart and Sandesha2. In addition, the PHP, Perl, and Python versions use the Apache Axis2/C libraries. We hope to develop versions that utilize at least the Apache CXF

RE: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Drew Baird (Volt)
+1 Drew From: Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:41 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Sanjiva Weerawarana
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Just two concerns... The project already uses core libraries from the Apache WS project including Apache Axis2/Java, Rampart and Sandesha2. In addition, the PHP, Perl, and Python versions use the Apache Axis2/C libraries. We hope to develop versions that

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator

2008-11-13 Thread Matthieu Riou
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while, and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or contributors