The vote has passed with: - Three binding "+1" votes - no "0" votes - no
"-1" votes
The votes were: - +1, Suneel Marthi (binding) - +1, John D Ament (binding)
- +1, Justin Mclean (binding) Vote Thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6b0acd6690fb59b9ad91a7c304ac8285afc1a3eb3e402ad1cf71bfb5@%3
+1 binding
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems reasonable. Changing my vote to +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For a
Thanks for being patient and working through this with us Justin!
--Tom
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 11:14 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems reasonable. Changing my vote to +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubs
Thanks everyone!
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Seems reasonable. Changing my vote to +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>
Hi,
Seems reasonable. Changing my vote to +1 (binding)
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
I want to wrap this up in a way that follow precedent. While Groovy was
incubating, we voted on their source releases. Their source releases
followed incubator policies - including the -incubating in the source
release file name. The output from the Groovy releases though (the
convenience binari
I agree on explicit clarity, especially in the cases of incubation projects
where people might be new to this whole process.
I personally scoured the available documentation yesterday after this came
up and just didn't have the time to chime in,
but I didn't find any specific guidance.
I agree wit
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:22 PM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Tal Liron wrote:
>
> Would a version like "1.9.0.incubating" be feasible?
>
>
> I appreciate the creative idea. :) But it's very non-standard and not with
> the spirit of what the version string is for. The "offi
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 5:52 PM, Tal Liron wrote:
>
>> Would a version like "1.9.0.incubating" be feasible?
>>
>
> I appreciate the creative idea. :) But it's very non-standard and not with
> the spirit of what the version string is for. The "official" document on
> versioning is this:
>
> http
> Would a version like "1.9.0.incubating" be feasible?
>
I appreciate the creative idea. :) But it's very non-standard and not with
the spirit of what the version string is for. The "official" document on
versioning is this:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/
You are allowed string specif
>
> My comment about the dependency on GPL code has yet to be answered, so
> I don't think you can claim compliance yet.
>
AriaTosca does not have a dependency on any GPL code.
The particular YAML file we are talking can be used by AriaTosca users to
spin up new virtual machines in the cloud some
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 5:29 PM, Tal Liron wrote:
>
> The Python package name does not contain the version. In Python tooling
> (setuptools, distutils, pip) you specify the dependency as a combination of
> a package name and a version qualifier (specific, list, range, etc.).
>
> (There are a few
The Python package name does not contain the version. In Python tooling
(setuptools, distutils, pip) you specify the dependency as a combination of
a package name and a version qualifier (specific, list, range, etc.).
(There are a few rare exceptions in which the version number becomes part
of the
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 7:53 PM Tal Liron wrote:
> The line mentioned is not in NOTICE. The line is specifically a comment in
> a file used to download/install a 3rd party product on the cloud. I truly
> think we are in the clear here.
>
> Re: Python packaging. Apache Airflow is also in incubatio
On 11 January 2018 at 00:52, Tal Liron wrote:
> The line mentioned is not in NOTICE. The line is specifically a comment in
> a file used to download/install a 3rd party product on the cloud.
OK, then my comment about the NOTICE file contents was not relevant here.
> I truly think we are in the c
The line mentioned is not in NOTICE. The line is specifically a comment in
a file used to download/install a 3rd party product on the cloud. I truly
think we are in the clear here.
Re: Python packaging. Apache Airflow is also in incubation and also, like
AriaTosca, does not have the "-incubating"
On 10 January 2018 at 17:10, Tal Liron wrote:
> John, the line is relevant. The service template in question is used to
> install and deploy Clearwater IMS.
The NOTICE and LICENSE files are ONLY for files that are actually
included in the release archive.
> I believe users should know what they
> On Jan 10, 2018, at 3:34 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> That tarball and wheel file you are looking at are not Apache
>> distributions, but rather Python packages. Are you sure they need to have
>> "-incubating" in the name?
>
> This seem fairly clear on what’s required. [1] What do o
Hi,
> That tarball and wheel file you are looking at are not Apache
> distributions, but rather Python packages. Are you sure they need to have
> "-incubating" in the name?
This seem fairly clear on what’s required. [1] What do other IPMC members think?
Thanks,
Justin
1. https://incubator.apach
John, the line is relevant. The service template in question is used to
install and deploy Clearwater IMS. I believe users should know what they
are installing.
I don't know if we can include a suffix easily, and wonder why need to
change it now -- it will make it harder for users to upgrade if th
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:35 AM Tal Liron wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Project Clearwater is GNU GPLv3, however it is not included in this
> distribution. These two files are Apache licensed. The line you quote is
> merely informational.
>
That line should be removed, as it is not relevant to the rel
Hi Justin,
Project Clearwater is GNU GPLv3, however it is not included in this
distribution. These two files are Apache licensed. The line you quote is
merely informational.
That tarball and wheel file you are looking at are not Apache
distributions, but rather Python packages. Are you sure they
Hi,
-1 binding as releases don't have incubating in the name.
apache-ariatosca-0.2.0.tar.gz
apache_ariatosca-0.2.0-py2-none-any.whl
Also can you confirm the license of these two files [1][2] as they contain:
"Project Clearwater is an open-source IMS core, developed by Metaswitch
Networks and re
The Apache AriaTosca Incubator PPMC has voted +4 to release Apache
Ariatosca 0.2.0. This vote carries over +1 binding vote from IPMC members.
Incubator PMC members please review and vote on this incubator release.
More information about AriaTosca can be found here:
https://github.com/apache/incub
24 matches
Mail list logo
