[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-24 Thread Cédric Champeau
Hi everyone! Vote for the release of Groovy 2.4.5-incubating passed with 6 +1 votes (5 binding) and no 0/-1 votes. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201509.mbox/%3CCADQzvm%3DRbC-1649Vt62e%3D%2BK35KRE4difPg0s7ryuQKoDSJc-QA%40mail.gmail.com%3E Thank you all!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-24 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 > [X] +1, release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating > [ ] 0, I don't care > [ ] -1, because... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-21 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (binding) On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Hi all! > > The Apache Groovy PPMC has successfully voted the release of Apache Groovy > 2.4.5-incubating [1], with 4 "+1" binding votes, one "+1" non binding and > no 0/-1 votes. We are now asking the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Cédric Champeau wrote: >.. The artifacts to be voted on are located here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/groovy/... +1 for the release, checked signatures, digest, license, notice, disclaimer and license headers of

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-21 Thread Paul King
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > > Two files do not have the standard Apache license header, changing > those would make future checks easier: > > ./config/codenarc/codenarc.groovy > ./src/spec/test/PrimitiveTest.groovy > > Fixed (for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-21 Thread Paul King
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Am 21.09.2015 01:17, schrieb Justin Mclean: > [...] > >> - The file LineColumnCheck.txt looks like it's source code and is missing >> an header. Is it Apache licensed or generated? >> > > The file provides test data.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 (ipmc binding) On 20 September 2015 at 20:20, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Hi all! > > The Apache Groovy PPMC has successfully voted the release of Apache Groovy > 2.4.5-incubating [1], with 4 "+1" binding votes, one "+1" non binding and > no 0/-1 votes. We are now asking

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-21 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 21.09.2015 13:29, schrieb Paul King: On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 3:37 PM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: Am 21.09.2015 01:17, schrieb Justin Mclean: [...] - The file LineColumnCheck.txt looks like it's source code and is missing an header. Is it Apache licensed or generated?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-20 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 6:20 AM Cédric Champeau wrote: > Hi all! > > The Apache Groovy PPMC has successfully voted the release of Apache Groovy > 2.4.5-incubating [1], with 4 "+1" binding votes, one "+1" non binding and > no 0/-1 votes. We are now asking the IPMC to

[VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-20 Thread Cédric Champeau
Hi all! The Apache Groovy PPMC has successfully voted the release of Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating [1], with 4 "+1" binding votes, one "+1" non binding and no 0/-1 votes. We are now asking the IPMC to vote it too. This release was done in a particular context, at the SpringOne2GX conference.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-20 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - source release has incubating in it’s name - signatures and hashes correct - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are good - All source code contains Apache headers - No unexpected binaries in source release I was unable to compile from source, may be this issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.5-incubating

2015-09-20 Thread Jochen Theodorou
Am 21.09.2015 01:17, schrieb Justin Mclean: [...] Some other things you may want to consider: - The convenience binaries are missing incubating from their name. so far we have not done this, because our pre-apache binaries did not have the incubating. It produces a problem for things, that