Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

2012-10-30 Thread Florian Holeczek
Hi all, taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy. Sebb wrote: The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license. In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document

Re: Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

2012-10-30 Thread Alexander Broekhuis
Hi, In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X. In the Celix case the file can/should be removed. But otherwise, it being a file

Re: Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

2012-10-30 Thread Florian Holeczek
Hi Alexander, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider this a binary file, just like a JPEG image for example. It's the document format of Graffle, a graphics software for Mac OS X. In the Celix case the file can/should be

Re: Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

2012-10-30 Thread sebb
On 30 October 2012 20:18, Florian Holeczek flor...@holeczek.de wrote: Hi all, taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy. Sebb wrote: The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license. In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this is XML, I consider