Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

Hi, > In Unix operating systems devices are files. For the I2C bus the device id > would /dev/i2c-0.(I do not believe this would be different on a PI vs and > Arduino). It a little different Arduino’s don't have an OS but a set of API/libraries you use. Lots of small devices don't have OSes or

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

Edward, you might not be aware that the Incubator is not a place to "start" new projects from scratch, but to educate communities in the Apache Way of operating as sustainable communities. We accept existing communities with existing projects... That said; I generally agree with your "ambition"

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:40 AM, wrote: > Hi all, > > Sounds quite interesting :) It might also be an idea to provide a home for > implementations of other hardware that can drive GPIO pins and can control > similar sensors and other devices. I'm thinking of an Arduino, or

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

Hi all, Sounds quite interesting :) It might also be an idea to provide a home for implementations of other hardware that can drive GPIO pins and can control similar sensors and other devices. I'm thinking of an Arduino, or something like an ESP8266. These are devices that are much simpler (and

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 9:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Edward Capriolo > wrote: > > I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of > > those attempts to brand a some random piece of

Re: [DISCUSS] new incubator project Apache IOT

On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote: > I know IOT is a super hot buzz word but here me out. This is not one of > those attempts to brand a some random piece of software as IOT :) Yeah, right ;-) > When working with hardware there are a few common