-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 (binding)
Past the 72 hour notation below but I didn't see a final tally.
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal
On 6/15/2011 9:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1 (binding)
Past the 72 hour notation below but I didn't see a final tally.
Then you missed the note.
[Hint: search for the subject RESULT]
---BeginMessage---
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Binding votes
On 10/06/11 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
At the end of
+1 (non-binding)
Greetings Raphael
Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as an
-1
As a foundation, we are optimized to support delivery of open source
code, it seems to me OOo and its user/community/the public would be
best served by an organization built for the delivery of a finished
end-user product. OOo would be such an anomaly for us I fear would
lead to an
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Dieter
Am 10.06.11 18:02, schrieb Sam Ruby:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as an
Hi,
Sam Ruby wrote (10-06-11 18:02)
Please cast your votes:
a. - : because of the difficulties ahead, as mentioned on this list, for
the OpenOffice.org product in the ASF (that may not be relevant for the
AFS, but IMO are for OpenOffice.org), and since TDF for me is a more
logical choice;
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 12:02:44 -0400
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
-1 (non-binding)
I've agonised long and hard about this. Wouldn't it be fantastic
to see Apache take on such a great trophy project? And of course
we'll be best-of-friends with TDF despite perhaps a few vocal
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1 binding. Given the sheer number of committers involved in this podling
there will be some work to do trying to gel a coherent development community
out of the group. While I am optimistic, I am reminded
...@leosimons.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, June 13, 2011 12:31:00 PM
Subject: [DISCUSS] how to add many committers to a new project (was: Re:
[VOTE]
Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation)
Hey hey,
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
+1
I see this is too late to count but I offer my thoughts anyway.
It was already late before it lurked in an outbox for a while.
[-1] (non-binding) Vote to reject the OpenOffice.org PROPOSAL
I reject the proposal not the community or the project.
I am still a bit of an open source newb and
+1
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
Comment: While I favor focusing on the reference implementation for ODF, as
my previous comments
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+/- 0 (non binding)
I am still going back and forth, on whether or not.
against:
I understand very well most of the arguments from André
+1 [binding]
Alex
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Hi,
On 10 June 2011 17:02, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 (non-binding)
Andrew.
--
asav...@apache.org /
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 (non-binding)
/niklas
+1 non-bindung
From Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net
Subject[VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:02:44 GMT
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding)
- Shane
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:12 PM, IngridvdM ingrid...@gmx-topmail.de wrote:
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
those who are willing to join
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to see a future for OOo and i hope that this can be a new
start. A few words to myself because i wasn't really visible here on the
list so far. My name is Juergen Schmidt (jsc) and I have worked on the
project since 1997.
Sorry, I used a wrong mail address and then resent my vote with the
correct one; please ignore this mail.
Regards,
Mathias
On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any
Sorry,
this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
please.
regards,
Mathias
On 12.06.2011 15:51, Mathias Bauer wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Mathias
On 10.06.2011 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
Btw, your mails appear to be sent twice to the ML. I recognized that
before already...
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Mathias Bauer nospamfor...@gmx.de wrote:
Sorry,
this was a mistake, I used a wrong mail address; ignore this posting,
please.
regards,
Mathias
On
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
-Bertrand, who agrees with Dirk.
On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Dirk-Willem van Gulik di...@webweaving.org wrote:
*: who is in a - what the hack mood - and thinks that get this code base in
a state where people can start hacking is better than
I vote -1 for the reasons I said here:
http://markmail.org/message/w5vtsa5nbarmnqxo
Niall
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem
Please ignore my vote below (duplicate).
I first used the wrong email address, which is not subscribed, then used
the correct one, and didn't expect that someone would moderate the list
and let the first one through...
Malte.
On 11.06.2011 17:59, Malte Timmermann wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
+1
Ralph
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache
Incubator
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding).
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[X ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
I have contributed to OpenOffice.org for several years and I doubt
that the project will find the
-Original Message-
From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat here, and this is my vote:
[ ] +1 Accept
Hi Gavin,
Op 11-6-2011 10:59, Gavin McDonald schreef:
-Original Message-
From: Volker Merschmann [mailto:merschm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 11 June 2011 6:49 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Hi,
I am wearing my OOo-hat
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
+1 from me (binding).
cheers,
Leo
+0 (non-binding)
I would likely have voted +1 if there were no existing Open Source
community behind LibreOffice.
The alleged(!) necessity to remove/replace LGPL libraries not covered by
the Oracle grant will not result in an improved free office suite but
only in delays and further
-1 (non-binding)
Within the discussion several reasons that might support a -1 vote were
named, many have been addressed or may be addresed by the podling.
I still feel obligated to vote -1 because (even if the podling advances
to a Apache TLP) this will be the end of OpenOffice.org as it is
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-1.
I think by accepting this ASF is risking quite a lot of flak and
reputational
Yes, and I also like to correct my previous statement: I actually meant that
ALL votes are welcome (not only +1)!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
From: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
N
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
This is such a difficult call. Will OOo at Apache take off sufficiently
to contribute something of value to the ecosystem, or will it fail,
taking goodwill with it? Will it create division in the community, or
does that division already exist, and creating the podling will simply
make the fact of
-1 (non-binding)
As stated elsewhere [1], this incubator, combined with the
disruption and delay it's causing to the OOo ecosystem, does not add
enough unique value to what we already have a TDF to justify the
effort.
(I'm referring to the existing proposal's mission statement [2], not
to the
+1 (non-binding)
--
Steve Lee
Full Measure - open source accessibility - http://fullmeasure.co.uk
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hi Sam,
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
(binding). Good luck!
Cheers,
Chris
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
(non-binding)
At first I thought beeing on the committers list would imply my approval
of the proposal. But now I'd like to give the reasons for my vote as so
many others did:
(All just my point of view as an suburban inhabitant of the old OOo
community)
+1 (non-binding)
/-/-/-/-/-/
Scott Wilson
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 (non-binding)
Malte.
On 10.06.2011 19:05, Sam Ruby wrote:
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Eric
On 10/06/11 18:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org
+1 (non-binding)
- Don Harbison
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:
Please cast your votes:
[ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72
+1 (binding)
Dick
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:06 PM, donald_harbi...@us.ibm.com wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
- Don Harbison
Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote on 06/10/2011 12:02:44 PM:
Please cast your votes:
[ X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I would like to humbly beg you people from Apache for giving a chance to
those who are willing to join you. I am deeply sorry that we are
bringing a big political dispute with us. My hope is that the community
that was so heavily
+1 (non-binding).
I'm not concerned by any the ASF don't do XYZ - there's very little
centralization and the pressure will mostly be on the Incubator and
then later members@ to ensure 'the Apache way' isn't closeted to
programmers.
It is a large project; but so what? I thought Harmony had no
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (non-binding)
I like the Apache license and I think having a really free alternative
is good for everyone, as much as clang vs gcc and linux vs FreeBSD.
Apache is also a good fit for OO technologically and I think the
incubation process will end up
+1 - binding
Regards,
Alan
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
I'm +1
If accepted, I'll try to help out with the podling, but alas I've not got
time at the moment to take on a full mentorship role of it.
Nick
-
To
Please cast your votes:
[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Danese
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 6/10/11 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 [binding]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 (non-binding)
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation (binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:20 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 6/10/2011 11:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 [binding]
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Non-binding.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (non-binding)
S.
Sorry, should have said +1 [binding]
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Danese Cooper dan...@gmail.com wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ +1 ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Danese
+1
non-binding
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
This vote will close 72 hours from now.
-1, as I feel this is not in the best interests of the world but rather of a
few powers.
(Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I believe but I have not been active ..
so lets chalk this up for non-binding.)
Sanjiva.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
***
[X] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
- Sam Ruby
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
- richard
On 6/10/11 12:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be
winding down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept
OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.
+1 (binding)
regards,
Karl
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
+1
- richard
On 6/10/11 12:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
--
---
Prof. Román H. Gelbort
No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones,
sino aplicaciones que resuelvan problemas específicos...
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (binding)
Marvin Humphrey
+1 (non-binding)
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
+1
-louis
On 2011-06-10 13:41 , Sander van der Waal wrote:
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (non-binding)
Sander
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
-1 (non-binding)
This proposal is for the hosting of all OpenOffice.org services by the ASF,
and mandates for items such as
+1
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Cheers!
-- Leif
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 binding, of course...
On Jun 10, 2011, at 12:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[+1] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort escribió:
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
and binding
--
---
Prof. Román H. Gelbort
No busquemos aplicaciones que reemplacen aplicaciones,
sino aplicaciones que
+1 (non-binding)
Andy Brown
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar
wrote:
El 10/06/11 14:17, Roman H. Gelbort escribió:
+1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
and binding
--
---
+1
On 10/06/2011 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down, I
would like to
initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an Apache Incubator project.
At the
+1 (binding)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yegor Kozlov yegor.koz...@dinom.ru wrote:
+1
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal
-0 (binding)
I concur with Sanjiva and it seems to be just a political move to me.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 19:04, Sanjiva Weerawarana
sanj...@opensource.lk wrote:
-1, as I feel this is not in the best interests of the world but rather of a
few powers.
(Officially I'm on the incubator PMC I
On Jun 10, 2011 9:03 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
...
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
+1
There are many reasons that this project might fail at Apache. These
reasons have been brought up and discussed enough that I feel
comfortable giving the project the chance to prove that it can be
successful.
Craig
On Jun 10, 2011, at 9:02 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (Non-binding)
--
Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest
On 2011/06/10 10:02 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject OpenOffice.org for incubation
+1 (Non-binding)
--
_
Larry I. Gusaas
Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan Canada
Website:
[x] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
On 06/10/2011 06:02 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
Please cast your votes:
[ ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
[ ] +0 Indifferent to OpenOffice.org incubation
[ ] -1 Reject
-1
My list of 44 reasons is here:
http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567
To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
they still exist.
Kind regards,
-Keith
P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
joined again to vote on their
-0 (binding)
My concerns:
- It wasn't the community that wanted to join Apache but commercial
entities decided and now the community is forced to join or stay away
- The OOo code base, eco system, and user base is huge and should be
managed by its own foundation
- A copy-left license fits well
+1 (Non-binding)
Thanks,
Kazunari Hirano
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
+1 (binding)
Sent from my mobile device (so please excuse typos)
On 10 Jun 2011, at 17:02, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding down,
I would
Hi,
[ +1 ] (non binding) Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
Thanks !
Eric Bachard
--
qɔᴉɹə
Education Project:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Education_Project
Projet OOo4Kids : http://wiki.ooo4kids.org/index.php/Main_Page
L'association EducOOo : http://www.educoo.org
Blog :
-1
I do not think that accepting this podling is in the best interest
of the ASF. Absent explicit criteria / principles governing what
we accept into the Incubator, I have to apply informal judgment here
and I am voting -1 for the following reasons:
0) I think the ASF has a responsibility to
Keith Curtis wrote:
-1
My list of 44 reasons is here:
http://keithcu.com/wordpress/?p=2567
To boil it down to one: this plan as announced had several big flaws, and
they still exist.
Kind regards,
-Keith
P.S. I don't see many from LibreOffice voting against this proposal, so I
joined again
[ X ] +1 Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
non-binding
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
-by-project.html#incubator-pmc
--- On Fri, 6/10/11, Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar wrote:
From: Roman H. Gelbort ro...@piensalibre.com.ar
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept OpenOffice.org for incubation
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 10, 2011, 6:13 PM
El 10/06/11 14:17
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
