Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-16 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofre
+1 (binding) Sorry I was late on this vote. Regards JB > Le 16 juin 2021 à 08:36, Furkan KAMACI a écrit : > > Hi, > > +1 (binding, carrying over my vote). > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:54 PM John D. Ament wrote: > >> Thanks for clarifying everything. I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-16 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi, +1 (binding, carrying over my vote). Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 3:54 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Thanks for clarifying everything. I think we are in good working order > then and here's my +1 (binding) to release. > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:52 AM Antoine Toulme

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread John D. Ament
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:48 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > Mikuli is from the same company that donated Cava… please, what are you > talking about? > And Cava is the project's name before it was Tuweni? > > > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:45, Justin Mclean > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >> Again, no.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Antoine Toulme
Mikuli is from the same company that donated Cava… please, what are you talking about? > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:45, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> Again, no. This code was part of the donation to the ASF. Someone took the >> defunct code of the original project and copied it to a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > Again, no. This code was part of the donation to the ASF. Someone took the > defunct code of the original project and copied it to a different project. I’m sorry but an entity can’t donate code that it doesn’t own the IP in. It’s is unfortunate that this issue wasn’t discovered at the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Antoine Toulme
> On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:24, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi > >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:16 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:10, John D. Ament wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme >> wrote: OK clearly I don’t get

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread John D. Ament
Hi On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 8:16 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > > > > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:10, John D. Ament wrote: > > > > Hi > > > >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme > wrote: > >> OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has been there since day 1 of the > >> project in our repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Antoine Toulme
 > On Jun 14, 2021, at 14:10, John D. Ament wrote: > > Hi > >> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: >> OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has been there since day 1 of the >> project in our repo and in good standing. >> Because someone on the Internet copied the defunct

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread John D. Ament
Hi On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 6:41 AM Antoine Toulme wrote: > OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has been there since day 1 of the > project in our repo and in good standing. > Because someone on the Internet copied the defunct project prior to > donation in no way warrants this release to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Antoine Toulme
OK clearly I don’t get it. This code has been there since day 1 of the project in our repo and in good standing. Because someone on the Internet copied the defunct project prior to donation in no way warrants this release to receive a -1, 3 years after the donation and multiple releases out! >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > That’s not the right solution. They copied code from the original project to > a separate project before it was donated to the ASF. This has nothing to do > with Tuweni. I'st one solution. Tuweni can, I’m sure come up with other possible ways of dealing with this. IMO It is an issue for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Antoine Toulme
> On Jun 14, 2021, at 11:42 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > >> The mikuli code was copied from cava prior to donation, looks like. That was >> three years ago, not sure how that happened or what to do about it. > > I would remove the ASF headers and note it inclusion and LICENSE in your

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, -1 (binding) due to 3rd party code having ASF headers. I checked: - incubating in name - disclaimer exists - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine. License is missing 3rd party code license. - No unexpected binary files - source code has ASF headers - don’t compile from source Kind Regards, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The mikuli code was copied from cava prior to donation, looks like. That was > three years ago, not sure how that happened or what to do about it. I would also check that no other 3rd part code come though in the donation and has been now incorrectly labeled as ASF code. Kind Regards,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > The mikuli code was copied from cava prior to donation, looks like. That was > three years ago, not sure how that happened or what to do about it. I would remove the ASF headers and note it inclusion and LICENSE in your LICENSE. > We most definitely built all the sodium code, using a

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Antoine Toulme
The mikuli code was copied from cava prior to donation, looks like. That was three years ago, not sure how that happened or what to do about it. We most definitely built all the sodium code, using a script as first pass then adding more docs and utilities. > On Jun 14, 2021, at 11:19, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I checked it mostly looks good but I’m a little concerned but the code in these directories [1][2] that have ASF headers but it looks like the code may actually be from elsewhere. For instance compare [3] to [4]. Is this code 3rd party code or based on 3rd party code? And if it is why

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-10 Thread Antoine Toulme
I am adding my +1 (binding) vote, ported over from the dev list vote. > On Jun 9, 2021, at 22:55, Antoine Toulme wrote: > > Absolutely. We onboarded a new committer earlier this year and have been > pushing hard to get new contributions >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-09 Thread Antoine Toulme
Absolutely. We onboarded a new committer earlier this year and have been pushing hard to get new contributions (https://twitter.com/_tmio/status/1402014603232497678). We received recently interest from 2 new contributors. To do so, I also started educating the project with resources on the ASF,

Re: [VOTE] Apache Tuweni 2.0.0

2021-06-09 Thread Xun Liu
Hi, Antoine +1 (non-binding) from me, I have checked the following items: - Incubating in name - NOTICE is fine - DISCLAIMER exists - All links are valid - No unexpected binary files - All ASF files have ASF headers In addition, I have no intention of offending, but I have a little suggestion. I