Hi Justin:
We have confirmed that these files are not being used, so they can be
removed, and I will initiate a new vote
Justin Mclean 于2021年4月13日周二 下午12:12写道：
> Hi,
>
> > I have contacted the submitter and the updates as follows：
> >> 4. ./ui/public/fonts/iconfont/iconfont.*
> > those file are
Hi,
> I have contacted the submitter and the updates as follows：
>> 4. ./ui/public/fonts/iconfont/iconfont.*
> those file are form https://github.com/ant-design/ant-design-icons which
> under MIT license
Thanks for that. That information shod be include in the LICENSE file.
>> 5
Hi Justin
I have contacted the submitter and the updates as follows：
> 4. ./ui/public/fonts/iconfont/iconfont.*
those file are form https://github.com/ant-design/ant-design-icons which
under MIT license
> 5 ./ui/public/fonts/fonts/icomoon.*
those file are generated by ant-design tool antd
HI,
> This is because part of the code is still in the experimental stage or has
> not been fully verified. Usually we will organize and submit it to the Apache
> code base after a period of time,
Also why not just work in a branch of the Apache project?
Justin
Hi,
> And because the trademark of Doris in China currently belongs to Baidu. We
> will discuss this matter later and resolve it before graduation.
I assume Baidu are willing to hand the trademark over to the ASF?
To avoid confusion it would be best if Baidu correctly uses the name as if it
Hi,
> 1. [1][2] [3] code under /be/src/gutil/ is come from Apache Kudu
But that not the original source is it, as it is not ASF licensed. If you did
take ASF code from Kudu then that shovel bee listed in your NOTICE file.
> 2. [6] [7] means that our previous version had dependencies under a
Hi,
I think there are still issues with this both from a trademark point of view
and from a release policy point of view. The docker file seems to be getting
the latests version of teh code not the last released version. [1]
Thanks,
Justin
1.
HI,
> We also plan to migrate our docker hub repo to the official Apache repo.
> Could you please provide some help?
Just raise an Infra JIRA for this.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Hi Justin,
> I notice the project installation instructions e.g. [1] refer to this
page [2]. That page needs a little work, IMO it should not mention Baidu as
the owner for starters.
I changed the owner from BAIDU to apache in this page[2]
https://hub.docker.com/u/apachedoris
Ling Miao
Justin
HI Justin
We also plan to migrate our docker hub repo to the official Apache repo.
Could you please provide some help?
Justin Mclean 于2021年4月12日周一 下午5:01写道：
> Hi,
>
> I notice the project installation instructions e.g. [1] refer to this page
> [2]. That page needs a little work, IMO it should
Hi Justin
1. [1][2] [3] code under /be/src/gutil/ is come from Apache Kudu
https://github.com/apache/kudu/blob/master/src/kudu/gutil/arm_instruction_set_select.h,
those file are also existed in impala's code
2. [6] [7] means that our previous version had dependencies under a GPL
license, but it
Hi,
I notice the project installation instructions e.g. [1] refer to this page [2].
That page needs a little work, IMO it should not mention Baidu as the owner for
starters.
Thanks,
Justin
1.
Hi,
-1 (binding) due to LICENSE and NOTICE issues, possible GPL dependancy issues,
and possible font licensing issues. There might be an explanation for all of
these, if so I’ll consider changing my vote.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- checksums are fine
- LICENSE seems OK but it’s not
Hi,
>> Some of this may depend on what the other release contains. Does it just
>> contain fixes / patches already in Apache Doris version control or does it
>> contain extra code from Baidu?
>
> It contains extra code from Baidu.
In that case it’s likely you can’t use Apache or Doris in the
Hi
Can we deal with the two matters separately? Let's finish the release of
this version first, and we will continue to resolve the trademark issue. Is
this acceptable?
Justin Mclean 于2021年4月12日周一 下午2:00写道：
> Hi,
>
> > Sorry for the trouble to everyone, we will re-evaluate the branding
>
Hi,
> Sorry for the trouble to everyone, we will re-evaluate the branding issue.
> Can we use the following names to publish versions maintained by third
> parties(NOT in Apache offical code repo)
>
> DorisDB, BaiduDoris, DorisBaidu, DorisDatawareHouse, DorisCloud, etc…
None of these names fit
But they are using Doris as a name. You have Baidu's team members in your
PPMC, then PPMC should take the responsibility to protect the branding.
Sheng Wu 吴晟
Twitter, wusheng1108
ling miao 于2021年4月12日周一 上午10:40写道：
> Hi Sheng Wu,
>
> > How is the version determined by the community? As Apache
; ling miao
抄送： general
主题： Re: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04
+1
Here is the article which is also confused in WeChat website. It is said Doris
0.14.7 is released.
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_HcOEni2mmVIuIRAyZ4baA
But in fact, Apache Doris 0.14.0 is in voting progress
-04-12 10:27
To: ling miao
CC: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04
That seems to be a brand issue.
Doris is an Apache incubator project, so the name of the project `Baidu
Doris` will confuse users.
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
Twitter: _WenMing
the
project is signed CCLA, this project 'Doris' is not belonged to Baidu anymore.
Apache Software Foundation Member, DolphinScheduler PMC
William Guo
guo...@apache.org
From: Ming Wen
Date: 2021-04-12 10:27
To: ling miao
CC: general
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Doris 0.14.0-incubating-rc04
Hi Sheng Wu,
> How is the version determined by the community? As Apache Doris was
donated
from Baidu(right?), why you are not using a new version?
The release of Apache Doris is only determined by the apache community, and
there is no possibility that BAIDU will vote and release the version
OK. I will check and fix the license header In next release, this thar OK ?
kezhenxu94@apache 于2021年4月12日周一 上午10:25写道：
>
> > On Apr 12, 2021, at 09:33, 寒江雪 wrote:
> >
> > Hi Zhenxu Ke:
> > Thanks for voting. The following files are not from 3rd-party, they are
> > written by ourselves:
> > 1.
That seems to be a brand issue.
Doris is an Apache incubator project, so the name of the project `Baidu
Doris` will confuse users.
Thanks,
Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair
Twitter: _WenMing
ling miao 于2021年4月12日周一 上午10:23写道：
> Hi Ming Wen,
>
> > When I searched for `Doris 0.14` on Google, I
> On Apr 12, 2021, at 09:47, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi
> Doris 0.14.7 is a rolling version maintained internally by baidu. We will
> regularly select committs from the community to the internal version and
> release the version number. 0.14.7 has nothing to do with the community’s
> 0.14 release.
ling miao 于2021年4月12日周一 上午10:23写道：
> Hi Ming Wen,
>
> > When I searched for `Doris 0.14` on Google, I found an article[1]
> mentioning that Doris 0.14.7 has been released.
> Doris 0.14.7 is an internal version of our baidu doris. It is not the
> version of apache doris, so apache doris has not
> On Apr 12, 2021, at 09:33, 寒江雪 wrote:
>
> Hi Zhenxu Ke:
> Thanks for voting. The following files are not from 3rd-party, they are
> written by ourselves:
> 1. be/src/olap/rowset/alpha_rowset_writer.h
> 2. be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp
If that’s the case, the
Hi Ming Wen,
> When I searched for `Doris 0.14` on Google, I found an article[1]
mentioning that Doris 0.14.7 has been released.
Doris 0.14.7 is an internal version of our baidu doris. It is not the
version of apache doris, so apache doris has not released version 0.14.
[1] The article is
Hi
Doris 0.14.7 is a rolling version maintained internally by baidu. We will
regularly select committs from the community to the internal version and
release the version number. 0.14.7 has nothing to do with the community’s
0.14 release.
Ming Wen 于2021年4月12日周一 上午9:27写道：
> Hello,
> When I
Hi Zhenxu Ke:
Thanks for voting. The following files are not from 3rd-party, they are
written by ourselves:
1. be/src/olap/rowset/alpha_rowset_writer.h
2. be/src/olap/rowset/segment_v2/empty_segment_iterator.cpp
I will fix the wrong path of
-1 (non-binding) from me.
I found an article https://blog.csdn.net/ucanuup_/article/details/115548997
which claims the 0.14.7 version was released.
Hello,
When I searched for `Doris 0.14` on Google, I found an article[1]
mentioning that Doris 0.14.7 has been released.
But I checked the historical release[2] and did not have this version.
In my understanding, 0.14.0 has not been released. Why does 0.14.7 exist?
[1]
+1 (non-binding)
I checked:
[√] Download links are valid.
[√] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[√] LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files exist.
[√] All files have license headers if necessary.
Thanks,
Xun Liu
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 10:13 PM Willem Jiang
wrote:
> I’m +1, I checked
>
>
I’m +1, I checked
- LICENSE, DISCLAIM and NOTICE files exist;
- Release candidate tar is signed, the Shasum.
- “incubating” exists in tar file name and documentation;
- License headers exist in files if necessary.
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:37
Hi, I’m +1, here are my check list
- LICENSE, DISCLAIM and NOTICE files exist;
- Release candidate tar is signed correctly, by "yang...@apache.org”;
- Shasum of the tar is correct;
- “incubating” exists in tar file name and documentation;
- License headers exist in files if necessary.
However, I
34 matches
Mail list logo
