On 01.02.2013 20:48, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way to get content to the web
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
On 01.02.2013 18:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for reminding me again ... silly me.
change the incubator.a.o
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the public-arch tree locally.
Thanks for
On 02.02.2013 19:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 18:06:11 +0100:
On 02.02.2013 16:29, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:01:42 +0100:
I'm all for moving this from minotaur to whimsy, and do suggest we
whimsy doesn't have the
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
know if we
On 31.01.2013 14:13, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an
On 31.01.2013 11:02, sebb wrote:
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way to get content to the web servers is to commit it
to svn and have
On 1 February 2013 17:05, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100:
I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it
doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server.
The only supported way
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14
On 1 February 2013 19:48, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote:
On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is
On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is
FWIW, I am definitively +1 to have it included in the incubator site
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
On 31.01.2013 15:12, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 31.01.2013 10:59, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
know if we can have the page regenerated more often, e.g., once an hour.
The first issue I see
On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100:
I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or
probably file an INFRA ticket). Infra are also in the best position to
know if we can have the page regenerated more often,
There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for
preview at
http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html
By embedded I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site.
The page is updated every 4 hours.
-- Brane
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
need to get podling developers interested with.
I
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
need to
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
podling
On 1/29/13 12:53 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name wrote:
I have a current example. Flex and Wink haven't updated their
podlings.xml entries to
status=graduated
, therefore certain infra scripts still consider them podlings rather
than PMCs.
My bad. I somehow missed that
On 29.01.2013 17:23, sebb wrote:
On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years.
Branko Čibej wrote:
sebb wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote:
Daniel Shahaf wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has
needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of
podling metadata is not reliable. That is something that we
need
On 28.01.2013 08:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled
Hi Branko!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
needs to be updated?
yes, we published the status page before we got the MLs addresses and
noticed they are in the new pattern :P could one of
On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Branko!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
needs to be updated?
yes, we published the status page before we got the MLs addresses and
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 28.01.2013 10:01, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi Branko!
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
Ah, could it be then that content/projects/onami.xml is just wrong and
needs to be updated?
yes,
thanks a lot Branko,
much more than appreciated!!!
all the best,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 28.01.2013
Branko Čibej wrote:
On 28.01.2013 08:58, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch
metadata is
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:22:42 +0100:
On 27.01.2013 16:17, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 15:30:04 +0100:
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
On 25.01.2013
On 26.01.2013 14:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
Brane, are you currently using the pickled clutch metadata? If we just
need to add a field to it we can.
Nope, I'm currently walking the incubator archive tree. The clutch
metadata is in general good enough, since if clutch can generate
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
general@. This solved
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed to general@incubator and that his message
wasn't
On 25.01.2013 16:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
I think I've managed to work around the fact that our mbox archives only
contain mails that were addressed To: a list, not Cc: that list.
I'll bet that Ryan isn't subscribed to
From: Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.name
To: Branko Čibej br...@apache.org
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Incubator voting status page
appears in the mbox archives of this list.
-- Brane
P.S.: Incidentally, I noticed that I need more smarts in the subject
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.org archives, which are in
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads addressed to
Do you also parse the d...@helix.incubator.apache.org
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not just general@, for vote threads
On 26.01.2013 00:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 18:40:18 +0100:
On 25.01.2013 18:26, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 15:27:25 +0100:
I changed the vote counting script so that it parses /all/ the incubator
list archives, not
On 24.01.2013 06:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:05 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
...the current results are here:
http://people.apache.org/~brane/incubator-votes.html
That page (should) get updated every 4 hours...
Cool - it might make sense to integrate with https://whimsy.apache.org/
-Bertrand
Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
tooltips?
That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
Cheers,
Joe
On 24 January 2013 04:05, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
A while ago I
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
We all seem to want a bit of feature creep. I would probably include a
last update time for the page.
Guys, you're committers, the code is in Subversion, go wild :)
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take cc's as being on the list or
On 24/01/13 16:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't take
On 24.01.2013 17:19, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:40:29 +0100:
On 24.01.2013 13:25, Gary Martin wrote:
Interestingly, the form that Ryan announced the results means that it
looks like the Bloodhound vote is still open. I'll guess that markmail
doesn't
On 24.01.2013 22:01, Branko Čibej wrote:
I've noticed before that our archives seem to be incomplete, and
indeed it appears that the mbox files contain only messages To: a
list, everything that actually gets delivered to subscribers by the
list server.
I meant to say, /not/ everything that
Great job, Brane!
On 1/24/13 3:50 AM, Joachim Dreimann joachim.dreim...@wandisco.com
wrote:
Good work Brane. Just one feature suggestion: Could you display the
relative time (ie '3 days ago') in the table, and the absolute time in
tooltips?
That would make it much easier to read I reckon.
Thats cool. I have something like that in mind before a couple of
days. Now its here. Its like Christmas. Thank you.
Our tool Marvin sens out mails for reports already; maybe it can be
used for reminders to vote too. If you find the code of Marvin, pls
let me know. I wanted to change the
Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 05:05:42 +0100:
There are currently no links to the actual vote threads. Also I'm having
a bit of trouble with the feed from mod_mbox, as it's quite short-term
and doesn't seem to be at all complete; that's why I switched to using
the current month's
61 matches
Mail list logo
