On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> ...Is the incubator full? No, but it needs to be careful about the nature
> of the set of mentors...
I fully agree with that, we should aim for podlings which are
"self-sustaining" in the sense that their mentors take care
On 25/08/16 07:34, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> I think you may be seeing signs of self-throttling. Basically if the
> new proposal
> comes in and there's nobody interested in mentoring it -- well the project
> won't
> go in.
Well, that just 1% of the work. Every body could easily volunteer for
I like the slider metaphor.
When I mentor, I like to start with the slider hard over by active,
especially during champion phase, but moving toward passive after the first
clean release and report or two.
I don't think that inactive projects actually require all that much thought
or action. The
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:26 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I'm wondering if the Apache Incubator is full right now?
>
> It seems that this question gets asked about once a year.
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:26 AM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> > I'm wondering if the Apache Incubator is full right now?
>
Very interesting question I wouldn't say full, because
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:26 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> All,
>
> I'm wondering if the Apache Incubator is full right now?
It seems that this question gets asked about once a year. The consensus
always seems to be that this may not be the right question to ask. It is
sort
Hi John,
Fair question. I think we accepted lot of projects in the incubator
recently.
IMHO, the first action to do is to check with the current podlings the
ones ready to graduate. I think we have at least 2 or 3 podlings ready.
On the other hand, we can also double check the global