>> Instead of having to actually DO releases, at least Release Candidates
>> should be created ... this would prove the general ability to do a release,
>> but not actually DO it. Of course if these RCs contain bad things, they
>> should not pass.
>
> I suspect in some cases there are repos
Hi,
Also seriously don’t stress about this, as a podling you are not expected to
know everything and learn as you go along. Try to ask your mentors for help and
involve them more, they can help with stuff like this,
Thanks,
Justin
Hi,
> That's exactly what we tried and were given grief about. We waited
> until 3 binding +1 votes, which is for practical purposes all of our
> active mentors
To be accurate this was tried without any discussion about this decision on a
mailing list (that I could find). IMO (and others may
> If the mentors on the project list have voted +1, then the vote can be
> continued in parallel? Shouldn't this help reduce both the time votes take
> but not waste the limited IPMC bandwidth?
That's exactly what we tried and were given grief about. We waited
until 3 binding +1 votes, which is
How about this as compromise?
If the mentors on the project list have voted +1, then the vote can be
continued in parallel? Shouldn't this help reduce both the time votes take but
not waste the limited IPMC bandwidth?
Regarding releasing of all repos ... how about this:
Instead of having to
Hi,
Please take this as friendly advice with with a bit of experience and personal
opinion thrown in. (if that intent is not obvious).
> * "parallel votes" is a technique to reduce the lag between dev@ and
> general@ by starting the IPMC vote slightly after, but before
> conclusion of the PPMC
Very useful.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:22 PM Adrian Cole wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Through Zipkin's incubation, I noticed that knowledge of state of the
> art is not equally distributed. Some voting approaches already in use
> aren't known. Also what you can use to automate isn't known. As
>
Thanks Adrian, this is all good to know.
> On Jun 4, 2019, at 9:21 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> Through Zipkin's incubation, I noticed that knowledge of state of the
> art is not equally distributed. Some voting approaches already in use
> aren't known. Also what you can use to
