Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Niclas Hedhman
AGES ago (~2002), I was running a project that used the openapi.org which is the RCP part of NetBeans. At that time, we had a job that downloaded the nightly builds to be tested and incorporated into our continuous build. The nightly, compared to source tree, had the advantage of being tested

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Greg Stein
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Can we be specific about what info is needed, or what further details > specifically, before going into a vote for acceptance of the proposal? My > concern is that each question we answer

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Mark Struberg
If we have a proper maven build and set up a Jenkins nightly build, then we have the same from repository.a.o. We do this for many projects already. LieGrue, strub > On Sunday, 18 September 2016, 9:39, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > AGES ago (~2002), I was running a project

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Mark Struberg
btw, I tried to import the netbeans-core repo from hg into github and it failed. Now trying to manually import it... Did anybody else do that? LieGrue, strub > On Sunday, 18 September 2016, 18:22, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > +1 > > >> -Original

RE: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 00:46 > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Geertjan Wielenga < >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Mark Struberg
quick update. hg cloned it locally and now batch importing over here. The hg clone took me 3 hours and the import is now running for 4 hours. Maybe that is the problem why github failed. I'm now at 89000/303000 in the import step. If I succeed then I'll push it to github. LieGrue, strub

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
This is the applicable repo to be cloning: hg clone http://hg.netbeans.org/main/ See the related FAQ on the NetBeans Wiki: http://wiki.netbeans.org/DevFaqAccessSourcesUsingMercurial Gj On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > quick update. > > > hg

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

2016-09-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I assume the header/licensing situation will be sorted out before graduation. I checked: - artefact contains incubating - signatures and hashes correct - LICENSE good - although short form (pointer to license text is preferred). - NOTICE ok - Not sure if all files have correct

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-09-18 Thread larsh
+1 - Built from v0.9.0-incubating tag.- ran tests. All pass.- all good -- Lars From: Poorna Chandra To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2016 10:44 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1] Hi all, This is a

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-09-18 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 binding I checked: - file name include incubating - signature and hash correct - LICENSE has minor issue - NOTICE is good - no unexpected binaries in file - all source files has ASF header - can compile from source LICENSE is missing appendix please fix for next release. Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-09-18 Thread Henry Saputra
Signature files look good Hash files look good NOTICE file looks good LICENSE file looks good DISCLAIMER file exists Source compiled No executables in source artiafcts +1 (Binding) On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Poorna Chandra wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a

Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2

2016-09-18 Thread John D. Ament
+1 binding While the release contents look odd, they're not wrong. We'll need to sort out the rest via legal prior to graduation. I would appreciate if the podling did start tracking a project specific goal of resolving the BSD licensing switch over to Apache License. John On Wed, Sep 7, 2016

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-18 Thread Mark Struberg
Yes. Current state 14/ 303000 imported. LieGrue, Strub > Am 19.09.2016 um 00:03 schrieb Geertjan Wielenga > : > > This is the applicable repo to be cloning: > > hg clone http://hg.netbeans.org/main/ > > See the related FAQ on the NetBeans Wiki: > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.9.0-incubating [rc1]

2016-09-18 Thread Poorna Chandra
Hi all, After being open for over 72 hours, the vote for releasing Apache Tephra 0.9.0-incubating passed with 5 binding +1s and no 0 or -1. Binding +1s: James Taylor Alan Gates Lars Hofhansl Justin Mclean Henry Saputra As suggested by Justin I have added appendix to the LICENSE file for the