Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

+1, Interesting proposal. I would be happy to be part of the project in any way possible.. (Contributor/Reviewer/Mentor/Committer) -Vinay On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, 6:32 pm Pierre Smits Hi Antoine, > > Thank you for bringing this proposal to the Apache Incubator. So I gladly > give my +1. > > Having

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher wrote: > Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean > that a software project called Cava is not suitable. > > BTW Cava is Spanish Sparkling Wine - it is like Champagne but made with > Spanish varietals. [1] > I read it as:

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Hi Antoine, Thank you for bringing this proposal to the Apache Incubator. So I gladly give my +1. Having a background in accounting and being one of the Apache OFBiz contributors I am very interested in blockchain technology, while being very interested in applying its functionalities in an ERP

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:12 PM Hen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:45 AM Roman Shaposhnik > wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:48 PM Dave wrote: > > > > > I totally agree with you that Docker images should be built from > official > > > source releases, unless they are clearly marked as

[VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) version 1.4.0.rc2

Dear community, This is a call for releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.4.0, release candidate 2 Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread:

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Count me in. On 2019/02/05 22:42:31, Antoine Toulme wrote: > Hi all,> > > We’d like to start a conversation around a new proposal for a set of > Java-based blockchain project.> > > I have written a proposal available here, and reproduced below: >

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:45 AM Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 2:48 PM Dave wrote: > > > I totally agree with you that Docker images should be built from official > > source releases, unless they are clearly marked as unofficial SNAPSHOT > > releases and intended for testing.

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean >> that a software project called Cava is not suitable. >> >> BTW Cava is Spanish

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

All, thank you for your expressions of interest. I have listed all names reported here and a few more colleagues and contributors in the page: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CavaProposal In particular, thank you for the folks stepping

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Hi Antonie, Thanks for the proposal! Feel free to ask any questions about it. By the way, right along with being an initial committer, I would like to help as a mentor too. Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:10 PM Antoine Toulme wrote: > All, thank you for your expressions

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Thanks Furkan, I’ll list you as a mentor too. > On Feb 6, 2019, at 10:18 AM, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > > Hi Antonie, > > Thanks for the proposal! Feel free to ask any questions about it. By the > way, right along with being an initial committer, I would like to help as a > mentor too. > > Kind

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

> On Feb 6, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > >>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher >> wrote: Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 10:48 AM Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Feb 6, 2019, at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 6:06 PM Dave Fisher > wrote: > >> > >> Hey just because there is a restaurant chain called Cava does not mean > >> that a software project called Cava is not

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Thanks, Hen. Seems like the "Apache controlled locations" bit is important here. If projects want to make convenience binaries available for installation via Docker and DockerHub, then it seems like we need an official Apache DockerHub repository. Do we have one of those, or are folks just

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Hi, > If projects want to make convenience binaries available for installation > via Docker and DockerHub, then it seems like we need an official Apache > DockerHub repository. Do we have one of those, or are folks just publishing > to personal repos? A quick look shows HTTP, Maven, Tomcat,

Re: Apache ODF Toolkit (retired) migration to TDF

Hi Dave, Dave Fisher wrote: > Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17810 > Thx a lot, seems the transfer is in flight. > > 2. adding a pointer from the ASF website > > https://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html to the new > > TDF website for the project, such that

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

HI, > 2. The PPMC should not publish software outside of Apache controlled > locations. We have TLP / PMCs doing that already > 3. Third parties may publish software based on Apache's, but they must not > cause user confusion (i.e. respect trademarks). And we have this as well (see docker

Mentor sign-off due next Tuesday (February 12th)

Hi, Mentor sign-off of the podling reports is due next Tuesday. So far these projects don’t have any sign-offs: - BRPC (missing report) - Doris - ECharts - Heron - Pinot - ShardingSphere - Tamaya Congratulations to SDAP where all mentors have signed off the report. Thanks, Justin

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Seems like some well established projects need some schooling from The Incubator :-) On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 6:41 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > If projects want to make convenience binaries available for installation > > via Docker and DockerHub, then it seems like we need an official

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 8:34 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > > 2. The PPMC should not publish software outside of Apache controlled > > locations. > > We have TLP / PMCs doing that already > > > 3. Third parties may publish software based on Apache's, but they must > not > > cause user

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Hi, > AFAIK everyone releasing binary convenience to dockerhub believed they were > authorized. I didn't have a problem with them if they are based on actual released software, although it seem it’s now not clear that in line with policy or not, lets alone if a PPMC can release tagged

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

Sorry I have not been following this as closely as I should have. It was decided after ShardingSphere was accepted into the incubator that the project would make a final release outside the incubator and then bring the code into Apache. The release 4.0.0 would be an Apache release. This was

Re: Tying Dockerhub into development and release management

Hey - not everyone agrees with Justin’s and Henry’s conclusions. I don’t have time to argue every point. AFAIK everyone releasing binary convenience to dockerhub believed they were authorized. Pulsar had ONE release that was current for a short time that mistakenly kept an RC in the name. It

Re: Unapproved Sharding Sphere releases

HI, > This was done. The issue is that the "3.0.0 outside Apache" release should > not be associated with Apache but with the previous project. They also made a 3.1.0 release as well and it was on the Apache github site (both 3.0 and 3.1 have now been removed from there). > It looks like the

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

+1 On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 at 13:04, Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > I have Blockchain development experience with my Blockchain startup and > would like to be added as an initial committer for this proposal. > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Feb 6, 2019 at 9:45 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >

Re: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava

Hi Antoine, as said in my other e-mail, I would like to help. Especially, it seems now you have a set of blockchain library, but not yet a runtime. I would like to help on the runtime part (if it's planned to be part of the project), especially around Karaf, Camel, Kafka, whatever. Regards JB