Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Geertjan Wielenga
Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel -- a key reason why we in Apache NetBeans are looking forward to graduation is that we'll not need to go through the loop of (1) PPMC approves, (2) IPMC rejects, (3) PPMC needs to put together a new release and vote on it again, (4) IPMC rejects

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Adrian Cole
Parallel would solve our problem of delayed bookkeeping as well. good idea. It is not so much about about the initial 72 hours, rather the pause then another 72hrs that someone having to remember. Podlings have a stateful experience during a release.. they have to know which are in what stage.

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi, I like Craigs suggestion and I'm aware of the problem with the ASF Policy if we would skip the formal IPMC Vote. On the other hand in PLC4X we had a discussion about a regular release cycle to bring new features to the users as fast as possible and decided to skip that for now, to keep the

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:13 PM Henk P. Penning wrote: >...If possbile, please remove 'older' releases from > https://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/openwhisk/ ... Good point Henk! Note that older releases are archived automatically under

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-234) Incubator Cookbook

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807665#comment-16807665 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-234: --- I agree with a page specific to

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel... I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for mentors to catch issues in the first one without bothering the IPMC. So maybe run parallel votes from

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0.

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Sat, Mar 30, 2019 at 1:20 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > ...I notice that the project when compiled it downloads this file [1] (and > other places), the text > of which is still under copyright, it’s currently unclear how to deal with > this. > There is a discussion on legal-discuss about it

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) 3.19.0.

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:20 PM James Thomas wrote: > This is a call for vote to release Apache OpenWhisk Client JS (incubating) > 3.19.0 +1 for the release of this archive, with a few minor things to fix for the next release, see below.

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807662#comment-16807662 ] Bertrand Delacretaz commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- I'm not sure if you can push to the

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

2019-04-02 Thread Henk P. Penning
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Dave Grove wrote: Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:01:05 + From: Dave Grove To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating) Hi Dave, We will proceed with the

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

2019-04-02 Thread David P Grove
"Henk P. Penning" wrote on 04/02/2019 07:13:11 AM: > >At the moment, OpenWhisk has in /dist/incubator/openwhisk/ : > >apache-openwhisk-0.9.0-incubating/ >apache-openwhisk-0.9.8-incubating/ >apache-openwhisk-0.10.0-incubating/ >

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Myrle Krantz
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:09 PM Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga > wrote: > > ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel... > > I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for >

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Julian Feinauer
I agree with the point from Myrle and Ross, I dislike the idea of parallel votes. Especially in the early stages we had multiple RCs which failed in the PPMC Vote process. I would not like to have them on the general@ list, as that adds a lot of noise. Julian Am 02.04.19, 16:41 schrieb "Ross

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - I recently added a detailed clutch analysis page for each podling. It is helpful for these situations as it lists all the releases in a flat sorted manner: https://incubator.apache.org/clutch/openwhisk.html Similar analysis could be added for TLPs … It also shows OpenWhisk 51 git

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/04/2019 16.53, Ate Douma wrote: On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote: Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

2019-04-02 Thread Matt Sicker
We have a fun layout in Logging: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/ On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 07:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote: > > ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote: Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view, it was time to

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] release Apache OpenWhisk Package Alarm, Package Cloudant, and Package Kafka 2.0.0 (incubating)

2019-04-02 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Dave, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM David P Grove wrote: > ...For us, using the the version as the primary organizing metric in the dist > isn't a great fit. Is there a precedent for doing otherwise (eg, first by > component, then the active branches within each component)?... As an

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ate Douma
On 02/04/2019 13.58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel... I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for mentors to catch issues in the first one without

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16807853#comment-16807853 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- I think that the concern is that the automatic build is

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

2019-04-02 Thread Ross Gardler
Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view, it was time to graduate. The IPMC should have nothing to do

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Livy 0.6.0-incubating released

2019-04-02 Thread Marcelo Vanzin
(Apologies to all, this is the same announcement as previously, but including the missing disclaimer.) The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy 0.6.0-incubating. Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long running Apache Spark contexts in your

Re: svn commit: r1856835 - /incubator/public/trunk/clutch2.py

2019-04-02 Thread sebb
Note that ?filename only works with action=download; that will start an immediate download. However that does not allow users to change the mirror except by reloading the URL. On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 18:55, Dave Fisher wrote: > > Hi Sebb, > > I’ve another place to fix - clutch2status.py - doing

Re: svn commit: r1856835 - /incubator/public/trunk/clutch2.py

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi Sebb, I’ve another place to fix - clutch2status.py - doing so now - thanks! Regards, Dave > On Apr 2, 2019, at 10:18 AM, s...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: sebb > Date: Tue Apr 2 17:18:41 2019 > New Revision: 1856835 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1856835=rev > Log: > Fix

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Livy 0.6.0-incubating released

2019-04-02 Thread sebb
On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 19:28, Marcelo Vanzin wrote: > > The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy > 0.6.0-incubating. > > Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long > running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. Livy enables > programmatic,

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Livy 0.6.0-incubating released

2019-04-02 Thread Marcelo Vanzin
The Apache Livy team is proud to announce the release of Apache Livy 0.6.0-incubating. Livy is web service that exposes a REST interface for managing long running Apache Spark contexts in your cluster. Livy enables programmatic, fault-tolerant, multi-tenant submission of Spark jobs from

Warning - Website Build Is Currently Broken

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher
I’m working on process to split the clutch and svn analysis and the normal git procedures. I ran into a problem (Bertrand warned me …). It’s going to take several hours to fix. Mostly I’ve got some errands to run and I need to clear my mind. Regards, Dave > On Apr 2, 2019, at 12:22 PM, Apache

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dave Fisher updated INCUBATOR-231: -- Comment: was deleted (was: {quote}I'm not sure if you can push to the master branch from a

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808065#comment-16808065 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- {quote}I'm not sure if you can push to the master

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-231) Cleanup Git-generated Incubator website

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16808168#comment-16808168 ] Dave Fisher commented on INCUBATOR-231: --- Bertrand I had to follow your plan. There is now a

[VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.0 [RC3]

2019-04-02 Thread Jonathan Wei
Hi IPMC, The Apache Druid community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.14.0 (rc3). We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Project description: Apache Druid (incubating) is a high performance analytics

All is good - Re: Warning - Website Build Is Currently Broken

2019-04-02 Thread Dave Fisher
Hi - Website build is now functional. Clutch and SVN content is now once a day and regular site editing is quick. More later. Regards, Dave > On Apr 2, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > I’m working on process to split the clutch and svn analysis and the normal > git procedures. >

Setting up DataSketches (name search in progress)

2019-04-02 Thread Kenneth Knowles
Hi all, I have added DataSketches to podlings.xml with help from Dave Fisher [1]. The name search is underway, credit to Lee Rhodes [2]. Next steps as I understand them are to set up: - podling status page - DNS - LDAP - web site - mailing lists - git repo I am not confident