Hi!
The Synapse incubator would like to make a Milestone 1 release. We proposed
this in December, with a successful vote from the WS PMC.
We have read the guidelines
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
and understand these.
The codebase has enough
Erik Abele wrote:
Oh, of course - but for now there's no community yet so he is
complaining into the blue sky :)
I'd certainly like to see a response to the concerns raised by Martin
but OTOH I don't think that it should evolve into a discussion about
basic architectural principles or
Raphaël Luta wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
Oh, of course - but for now there's no community yet so he is
complaining into the blue sky :)
I'd certainly like to see a response to the concerns raised by Martin
but OTOH I don't think that it should evolve into a discussion about
basic
David Crossley wrote:
I am investigating creating a Forrest output plugin
to do the complete conversion. If Geir or others
come up with another solution then fine, this will
still be a useful tool for Forrest.
Update: We now have a Forrest output plugin working to
generate Anakia xdocs
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 14:27, Martin Cooper wrote:
And the impact of giving a project the ASF brand. And the way the incubator
operates as an open door to whoever knocks, with virtually no entry
criteria.
This seems to be a recurring (growing?) concern among people 'inside' ASF.
Perhaps
Add new content to faq
--
Key: INCUBATOR-13
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-13
Project: Incubator
Type: Improvement
Reporter: Gavin
Priority: Minor
Mentioned on list, extra bullet points added to clarify initial code
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-13?page=all ]
Gavin updated INCUBATOR-13:
---
Attachment: faq.xml.diff
Added points raised on list. Hope this is correct and in a suitable place,
please check before comitting.
Add new content to faq
- Original Message -
From: David N. Welton (JIRA) general@incubator.apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 5:12 PM
Subject: [jira] Commented: (INCUBATOR-12) Process_Description.html
navigation improvement
|[
+1
On Jan 10, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
I propose that we accept the CNET's Solr project into the incubator.
Discussion on this list evidenced broad interest in this project,
which bodes well for its ability to build a developer community.
The Lucene PMC would be happy to
+1 on the proposal. I am assuming that the project
will not have a generic technology name (Roy's point)
but I'm not withholding my vote for that.
On Jan 16, 2006, at 9:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Erik Abele wrote:
On 16.01.2006, at 02:42, Sam Ruby wrote:
The discussion has died down, and the time
Status report for the Apache Incubator Project
The Incubator continues to see good progress in a number of projects and
their communities.
Several items of note from this past quarter:
We have had some discussion regarding the rate of growth,
Sam Ruby wrote:
And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
Andy, any preference?
I don't have any particular preference in regards to
the name. If people have a problem with AjaxTk being
too broad, then any other name will do. I have a
natural preference towards
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I see .java files - that has nothing to do with AJAX,
so I'm sort of confused. I'd be expecting to see, well,
only JavaScript.
[...]
If it has .java files, it isn't a 'client library'. So,
I want to make sure we clarify where the boundaries are,
so stupid
This second posting has a revised Roller report, and the WSRP4J report.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
First off, I would like to thank everyone for taking interest in the ajax
toolkit incubator proposal and for the time folks are taking in providing
feedback. From reading the various postings, there seems to be three areas of
concern:
1) Project name. The issue here seems to be
Status report for the Apache Incubator Project
==
The Incubator continues to see good progress in a number of projects and
their communities.
Several items of note from this past quarter:
We have had some discussion regarding the rate of growth, how
Martin Cooper wrote:
the incubator operates as an open door to whoever knocks,
with virtually no entry criteria.
The criteria is that another PMC votes or the Incubator PMC votes. In the
latter case, we should be looking to see interest from the Membership. In
numerous cases, I can think of
With five +1 votes, one +0, and no negative votes, the Solr project has
been accepted into the Incubator. As a Mentor, I will now work with the
committers to get things going.
Doug
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Raphaël Luta wrote:
along with [a] codebase come an established group of committers
with an interest in keeping their current architecture or at
least backward compatibility
That carries a fairly large assumption, and really should be posed as a
question, not an answer.
An established
Status report for the Apache Incubator Project
==
The Incubator continues to see good progress in a number of projects and
their communities.
Several items of note from this past quarter:
We have had some discussion regarding the rate of growth, how
Tobago came through with its report.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On January 17, 2006 11:36:23 AM -0800 Andrew Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
While this submission starts with the primary widget
toolkit needed to start building AJAX applications, there
is a need for server-side code to complete the model. And
Java is a natural solution for this part and it
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Andrew Clark wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
I see .java files - that has nothing to do with AJAX,
so I'm sort of confused. I'd be expecting to see, well,
only JavaScript.
[...]
If it has .java files, it isn't a 'client library'. So,
I want to make sure we clarify
Andrew Clark wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
Andy, any preference?
I don't have any particular preference in regards to
the name. If people have a problem with AjaxTk being
too broad, then any other name will do. I have a
natural
how about AJAX?
:)
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hola,
I'll chime in with some name ideas just for consideration ;)
And fwiw, I like 'Jambaloo' as a name but probably that's just me ;-)
Mmm, yeah, maybe that's just you ;)
natural preference towards Japanese names, though,
so I'll suggest Kabuki.
I thought all of it was pretty much done except for the project pages in
cwiki, but you said those are HTML, so just waiting for a shipment of
Round Tuits
Sounds cool, though.
geir
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I am investigating creating a Forrest output plugin
to do the
Yoav Shapira wrote:
natural preference towards Japanese names, though,
so I'll suggest Kabuki. :)
Kabuki is not bad, though somewhat old-fashioned, no?
I guess I'm an old-fashioned kind of guy. :) Actually,
my favorite traditional Japanese art is bunraku even
though I (sadly) have not seen it
I have made a few modifications to the Ajax proposal
Wiki page[1] in an attempt to resolve a few of the
issues people have raised. The changes include:
* Changed name to Kabuki
* Added text to clarify the scope of the project
Please let me know if there are any other issues that
should be
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
@)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
also have on a wiki for
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I thought all of it was pretty much done except for the project pages in
cwiki, but you said those are HTML, so just waiting for a shipment of
Round Tuits
Yes but Anakia doesn't deal with HTML, does it?
I am not sure what you were waiting for. I think
that we
David Crossley wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
I thought all of it was pretty much done except for the project pages in
cwiki, but you said those are HTML, so just waiting for a shipment of
Round Tuits
Yes but Anakia doesn't deal with HTML, does it?
Right - so I have to convert them
On Wednesday 18 January 2006 07:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Does anyone else feel this way? Mail archives will live for years in
distributed places. Wiki's seem to be single-sourced and a lot more
ephemeral
Yes. As the primary tool of communication for myself and many others, mails
are
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki? (or
@)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community. Feel free to
also
[changed subject line though I don't intend to have a big discussion
about this topic]
On 18.01.2006, at 00:16, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Is this becoming the current de-facto process, posting to a wiki?
(or @)#!)#@ wiki, as I tend to think of them...)
Can we please have things go to the
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the incubator.
Shall I send the email to root? Or do I need a PMC to do so?
What is the relevant PMC... Lucene or the Incubator? (Solr is going
to be a sub-project of
On 18.01.2006, at 02:32, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the incubator.
You are right, this manual is a bit thin on details for incubator-
related projects.
Shall I send the
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Can we please have things go to the mail list, as that should be the
'primary institutional memory' of the incubator community.
+1
But let's try to say such things to be educational, not chastising.
--- Noel
+1 for going ahead with the milestone release.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 09:09 +, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Hi!
The Synapse incubator would like to make a Milestone 1 release. We proposed
this in December, with a successful vote from the WS PMC.
We have read the guidelines
On 18.01.2006, at 02:37, Erik Abele wrote:
On 18.01.2006, at 02:32, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I had read that guide, but it seems geared toward existing projects
wasn't clear what to do in the case of a new project in the
incubator.
You are right, this manual is a bit thin on details for
Here's another starter installment for the Incubator Guidelines
Documentation project Noel posted at
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200512.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Several times during derby's incubation I felt disoriented because while
there's a lot of info on the
Hi Geir (and all),
my name is Jacopo Cappellato, I'm one of the developers of the OFBiz
project and, as you can imagine, I'm very interested in your feedback
about our request to join the ASF Incubator.
About the proposal posted to the Wiki instead of to this list... well if
you go to the
Dumb question. Are the completion dates on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/roller.html when the event
happened, or when it was marked as complete.
ie) to start ticking these things off, do I need to go do mailing list
audits etc to figure out when things happen, or can I just put today's
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
one else beats me to it.
Here we go:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OFBizProposal
I changed the proposed sponsor to the
On 1/18/06, Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:45:49PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
David N. Welton wrote:
I guess it should be placed on the wiki? I'll do that later today if no
one else beats me to it.
Here we go:
Here is the result of my experiment ...
[1] http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-anakia/
The existing Incubator site was converted to
Anakia xdoc format. I used a local copy of Geir's
previous experiment [2] but with the forrest-generated
anakia xdocs.
We can tweak the Forrest plugin to
Responding to some issues that people have with the
layout of the current forrest-based website.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~crossley/incubator-forrest/
If you want me to implement any of these immediately
then say so.
Get rid of PDF
--
There was a PDF generated for every page.
46 matches
Mail list logo
