+1
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
that the
Qpid project should increase its diversity.
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the
incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4
IPMC members voted to dissolve the NMaven project and take it out of
the incubator.
Is there any official process or do we just update the
Hi,
The following reports are missing from the wiki page [1]:
BlueSky
Buildr
Droids
Lokahi
Olio
Tashi
VCL
WSRP4J
XAP
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008
BR,
Jukka Zitting
-
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following reports are missing from the wiki page [1]:
Hmm, I somehow missed the thread already started by Bertrand. So
please ignore this and use Bertrand's thread instead.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
We really need for these stuffs to efficiently continue on the development.
There are some great open source developers to work on the project, but I
want that setting up all artifacts of the project in the Apache side, svn,
jira, mailing lists etc is done before this. I think that discussions
SVN is not setting now. But you can download all the sources from the
sourceforge side [1] for the time being.
[1] http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.
GE
2008/11/13 Mohammad Nour El-Din [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi I am interested to access the src code of OpenWenBeans.
On 11/12/08, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...The full proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StonehengeProposal..
That says future contributions could depend on proprietary systems
such as
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation process (started in May 2006!), but I think the Abdera
community, while small,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation
Hi I am interested to access the src code of OpenWenBeans. But the svn
repo is not working yet. When it is going to be avail ?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or
mentors of the
How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or
mentors of the project should do?
Thanks;
Gurkan
2008/11/6 David Crossley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Author: kevan
Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
New Revision: 711682
URL:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...So please vote away. A +1 vote is for sending the following motion to
the board for its approval
+1, congrats!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe,
you can produce them and upload them to a jira ticket.
I doubt that you have write access on the page
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How will we progress on this? As a committer can I produce these pages? Or
mentors of the project should do?
Thanks;
+1
Dan
On Thursday 13 November 2008 8:59:05 am Garrett Rooney wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list
Why wasn't this done on dev@ (especially the vote)? The Apache Way(tm)
suggests that these decisions should be done in public (a quick poll
on private@
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list
Why wasn't this done on dev@ (especially the vote)? The Apache Way(tm)
+1 !
(PS: Please add Email addresses to the Resolution).
On Nov 12, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our
dev list that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator
PMC felt that the
Qpid project
Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1 !
(PS: Please add Email addresses to the Resolution).
ack, will do so before I submit it to the board.
many thanks
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1
On Nov 13, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation process (started in
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why wasn't this done on dev@ (especially the vote)? The Apache Way(tm)
suggests that these decisions should be done in public (a quick poll
on private@ is not a problem)
The discussion included determining the list of
Thanks a lot
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:13 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SVN is not setting now. But you can download all the sources from the
sourceforge side [1] for the time being.
[1] http://bigfaces.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bigfaces/webbeansimpl/.
GE
2008/11/13
Robert
Excellent points:
...The full proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StonehengeProposal..
That says future contributions could depend on proprietary systems
such as Microsoft .Net or commercial JEE servers, which IIUC means
that some parts of Stonehenge might not be
On 13-Nov-08, at 2:23 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:50 AM, Jason Van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do we have an official process for dissolving a project in the
incubator?
We had a vote amongst the IPMC members for NMaven yesterday and 3/4
IPMC
members voted to
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
+1.
Yoav
I'd also point out that there are free SDKs and Express versions of most of the
Microsoft development tools [1], targeted at non-commercial developers. See
[2] for a neutral discussion of what has been left out of the Express editions.
So, while these tools are not open source, there are no
On 13-Nov-08, at 2:16 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Depends on what take it out of the incubator means:
- graduation to TLP
- graduation to sub project
- stop incubation altogether and possibly continue elsewhere
Take it out of the incubator and Apache all together.
Graduation is covered in
The vote was among the NMaven PPMC. Is it required to have an additional
IPMC vote or can we just start wrapping it up, letting the developer
community know the next steps?
Thanks,
Shane
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 7:11 AM, Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13-Nov-08, at 2:23 AM, Niclas
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal Apache
process of course
+1
Craig
On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:59 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation process
Paul Fremantle wrote:
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Craig
On Nov 13, 2008, at 5:59 AM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:59 AM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...Please vote +1 to accept, or -1 with reasons to not accept as a podling...
+1
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
+1
Niall
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 8:51 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is with the support of our mentors and a community vote on our dev list
that Qpid
would like to graduate. In our last graduation vote the incubator PMC felt
that the
Qpid project should increase its
+1
Niall
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:59 PM, Garrett Rooney
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please add your reports at
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008 Real Soon.
Buildr report added, sorry for the delay.
Assaf
-Bertrand
+1
Niall
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
+1
Kamal
-Original Message-
From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:51 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator
+1
Niall
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Garrett Rooney wrote:
After some brief discussion here and a vote on the Abdera private
list, it seems everyone is in favor of this, so I'd like to propose
that we ask the board to make Abdera a new TLP. It's been quite the
long incubation process (started in May 2006!), but I think the Abdera
+1.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
contributors still considering getting involved, but the normal
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...The full proposal is here:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/StonehengeProposal..
That says future contributions could depend on proprietary systems
such as Microsoft .Net or commercial
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
4. running continuous integration on shore may require licenses. it's
important that contributors understand this and don't just start
diving in. it may be better to start off shore.
As a US based Deleware 501(c)3 that wouldn't protect us.
As far as continuous
Garrett Rooney wrote:
The discussion included determining the list of people to put on the
final PMC list. The actual list of Abdera committers was larger, but
many of them had not participated in the project in some time or at
all, or had explicitly left the project. Since I didn't want
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
The discussion included determining the list of people to put on the
final PMC list. The actual list of Abdera committers was larger, but
many of them had not participated in the project in
Just two concerns...
The project already uses core libraries from the Apache WS project
including Apache Axis2/Java, Rampart and Sandesha2. In addition, the PHP,
Perl, and Python versions use the Apache Axis2/C libraries. We hope to
develop versions that utilize at least the Apache CXF
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
The discussion included determining the list of people to put on the
final PMC list. The actual list of Abdera committers was larger, but
many of them had not
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
I'm presuming there was not a dev@ vote yet by the Abdera community itself?
If not, could you please call that vote ASAP in parallel with the general@
vote? Monday evening is not to late to put this on the board
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
I'm presuming there was not a dev@ vote yet by the Abdera community itself?
If not, could you please call that vote ASAP in parallel with the general@
vote? Monday evening is not to late
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:54 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
I'm presuming there was not a dev@ vote yet by the Abdera community itself?
If not, could you please call that vote ASAP in parallel with
+1
Drew
From: Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:41 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Accept Stonehenge into the Incubator
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
4. running continuous integration on shore may require licenses. it's
important that contributors understand this and don't just start
diving in. it may be better to start off shore.
As a US based Deleware 501(c)3 that wouldn't protect
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Just two concerns...
The project already uses core libraries from the Apache WS project
including Apache Axis2/Java, Rampart and Sandesha2. In addition, the PHP,
Perl, and Python versions use the Apache Axis2/C libraries. We hope to
develop versions that
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:41 AM, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Stonehenge proposal has been around for discussion for a while,
and we now have a wide set of contributors and mentors, so I'd like to
call a vote. I know there are some other potential mentors and or
contributors
54 matches
Mail list logo
