On 12 May 2009, at 00:24, sebb wrote:
Some NOTICE files start with:
=
=
=
==
== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d
of==
== the Apache License, Version
2.0,
On 12/05/2009, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 00:24, sebb wrote:
Some NOTICE files start with:
=
== NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of==
== the Apache
2009/5/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are created
by the war packager that contained 3rd party libraries the DEPENDENCIES file
was sufficient to comply with
On 12/05/2009, Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/12 sebb seb...@gmail.com:
I was reliably informed that this was discussed on the Maven list in March
2008 (subject: legal-discuss) and for binary distributions that are
created
by the war packager that contained
So, those of you may be aware that the JSecurity/Ki podling currently
is administratively stuck on a debate about its name. First some
history then a brief explanation of my position.
After a long and arduous debate the podling voted to change its name
from JSecurity to Ki. After the
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
let this go other than nope, it's not the same. Otherwise, I feel that I
need to bring up a vote to put the issue to bed once and for
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow me to
let this go other than nope, it's not the same. Otherwise, I feel that I
need to bring up a vote to put the
The vote to release Apache Sling passed by lazy consensus. The following
Incubator PMC members already voted for the release of the podling:
Bertrand Delacretaz
Felix Meschberger
Carsten Ziegeler
Jukka Zitting
Thanks for voting; I'll upload the release on thursday.
Regards
Carsten
Carsten
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
allow me to
let this go other than nope, it's not the same. Otherwise, I
feel that I
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would
allow me to
let this go other than
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.comwrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
wrote:
...I'd like someone to come up with a concise argument that would allow
me to
let this go other than nope, it's not the same. Otherwise,
At Apache XMLBeans, we're also could make use of an XQuery engine for
implementing selections and query on xbeans.
Cezar
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Paul Fremantle pzf...@gmail.com wrote:
Synapse would also be interested in using the XQuery implementation!
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, May 11,
Paul,
Thank you for your interest in the VXQuery engine. We are looking for
mentors for the project. Would you be willing to be a mentor?
Thanks,
Vinayak
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Synapse would also be interested in using the XQuery implementation!
Thanks
Paul
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:22 PM,
On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com
On May 6, 2009, at 11:40 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
All,
Given that the discussion has quieted down after an initial flurry,
I was hoping we could move this forward.
If there are no further comments/concerns, could we call for a vote
on whether or not to accept the proposal by
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 21:46, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 11:12 AM, Craig L Russell wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 9:06 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
Thanks Kevan, do I need to call for that formally myself or does it need to
come from an Incubator PMC member?
-Nick
Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere - REST WebServices Development
nlgal...@us.ibm.com
Phone: 512-286-6258
Building: 903 / 5G-016
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
The main point is that you and I disagree on whether FixFlyer Ki and Apache
Ki are in the same domain.
I have neither broad nor deep experience with securities trading systems,
but I do know what financial
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
I mean, there are probably better (coding) and harder (releasing,
graduating) things to do
I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all the
NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO,
the top-level L N files need to relate to the entire contents.
Transitively or just for the first level dependencies?
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 22:58, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Bernd Fondermann
bernd.fonderm...@googlemail.com wrote:
What I don't get is why would anyone want to keep the name if there
are potential overlaps or troubles ahead?
I mean, there are
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 14:56 -0500, Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
Thanks Kevan, do I need to call for that formally myself or does it
need to come from an Incubator PMC member?
If you have sufficient mentors on your proposal, then anyone can do it.
Just be sure to embed the proposal into the vote
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 11:10 PM, Les Hazlewood lhazlew...@apache.org wrote:
How do you check to ensure that the name is actually usable? We did a lot
of due diligence on Ki, checked USPTO searches for patents/trademarks on Ki
and found not a single result, and performed lots of google
On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through all
the
NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the required information. IMO,
the top-level L N files need to relate to the entire contents.
Transitively or just for the first
On May 12, 2009, at 3:09 PM, sebb wrote:
On 12/05/2009, Craig L Russell craig.russ...@sun.com wrote:
On May 12, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
Earlier, sebb wrote:
I don't think it's OK to expect users to have to trawl through
all the
NOTICE and LICENSE files to find all the
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
JSecurity was deemed as a potential naming conflict risk (much in the same
way Ki is now), so we dropped it, and finally came to a vote to change the
name to Ki. But this resolution took over 4 or 5 months to finally come to
a favorable vote, so we didn't want to go
26 matches
Mail list logo
