On 7/1/2010 11:19 AM, ant elder wrote:
>
> I've been suggesting it would be simpler for Chukwa to go directly to
> TLP but if thats not going to happen then you have my support to
> incubate if thats what they really want to do, and I agree a new vote
> might making things clearer. It seems a sham
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann
> wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Fair point.
>
> The naming debate is only about the location of the project in svn and
> the mailing lists, right? Conducting the vote with this variable has
> become mor
Dear Zeta Components Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for . The report
for your podling will form a part of th
Dear Nuvem Developers,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for . The report
for your podling will form a part of the Incubato
+1 (binding)
Was able to build from the tag, RAT output looked OK and jars had the
required License/Notice/Disclaimer files.
-Donald
On 6/29/10 4:04 PM, Jesse A Ramos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Wink 1.1.1 release voting has completed successfully on the wink-dev list.
> I'm now calling the IPMC vote
Here is a link to end of the wink-dev vote. In the thread are Kevan's and
Davanum's votes.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wink-dev/201006.mbox/%3cofb5600e5f.38535bd6-on87257751.0069b2e9-86257751.006a3...@us.ibm.com%3e
-- Jesse Ramos
From:
Bertrand Delacretaz
To:
general@
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Bernd Fondermann
wrote:
[snip]
Fair point.
The naming debate is only about the location of the project in svn and
the mailing lists, right? Conducting the vote with this variable has
become more arduous than all the INFRA and site work it implies; let's
drop it. E
Just a second. (Dropping TO gene...@hadoop.a.o.)
Please don't confuse DISCUSSION and VOTE.
BTW, it's best practice for a Incubator proposal (or any other type of
initiative at Apache) to first have a DISCUSSION or PROPOSAL thread,
and then have a vote afterwards, when thread hijacking is less likel
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Jesse A Ramos wrote:
> I should also note that Wink 1.1.1 does have two binding IPMC votes from:
>
> Davanum Srinivas
> Kevan Miller
>
> We received these votes during the wink-dev voting...
Please include a reference to that vote then (Message-Id or archive
link
