On Fri, Mar 29, 2013, at 01:56 AM, Chris Douglas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
wrote:
Your position is that the IPMC fails to supervise. The consensus of the
IPMC is that this is not true. Otherwise, someone would be reading the
monthly
To summarise. The incubator *is* broken (but not necessarily beyond
repair). We need as many mentors as we can get, and a smaller group of
people who are delegated responsibility for the incubator. The board
wants a group of folks to take responsibility for overseeing the early
life of
Hi Benson,
-Original Message-
From: Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 8:02 AM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
...Why is it so hard to see that the board is already watching those 22
nascent projects in the same manner they watch the 137 TLPs?...
It's not.
Well, maybe it is, but up to a point. The good thing
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
We need one set who are 'incubator people' and another who are 'mentors'.
Disenfranchising mentors and hoarding power within a small circle of IPMC
aristocrats is both unworkable and hypocritical.
* It is unworkable because
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013, at 07:12 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
We need one set who are 'incubator people' and another who are 'mentors'.
Disenfranchising mentors and hoarding power within a small circle of IPMC
aristocrats is
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
The Incubator has two acute, serious problems.
1. First releases are too hard.
No surprise. This is incredible hard to read:
On 31 March 2013 17:08, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Why is it so hard to see that the board is already watching those 22
nascent projects in the same manner they watch the 137 TLPs?
Because they are not watching with the same manner. They are delegating a
Hi Ross,
-Original Message-
From: Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Date: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:20 PM
To: general@incubator.apache.org general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Incubator structure (was Re: Vote
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I have heard a few people say they just want to mentor, without the rules
discussion crap (see ml). Thats perfectly OK. But what do we need them on
the IPMC?
One of the chief responsibilities for a Mentor is
10 matches
Mail list logo
