David Crossley wrote:
> Upayavira wrote:
> > I have one (hopefully) simple question for those more familiar with the
> > ASF\s bylaws/etc.
> >
> > As I understand it, the board has delegated responsibility for the
> > incubator, and thus incubator podlings, to the Incubator PMC and its
> > members
Upayavira wrote:
> I have one (hopefully) simple question for those more familiar with the
> ASF\s bylaws/etc.
>
> As I understand it, the board has delegated responsibility for the
> incubator, and thus incubator podlings, to the Incubator PMC and its
> members. Thus, it is only members of the In
I reckon that these lists are not complete.
Would people from each podling review the generated lists at:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
a list of all current podlings with Description and Mentors, etc.
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#mentors
all people listed and their associated
I have one (hopefully) simple question for those more familiar with the
ASF\s bylaws/etc.
As I understand it, the board has delegated responsibility for the
incubator, and thus incubator podlings, to the Incubator PMC and its
members. Thus, it is only members of the Incubator PMC that have the
abi
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> ...
Well said. Hooray for common-sense and taking ownership.
We must remember that we are all individuals. The ASF
enables us to do what we want. We each need to take the
initiative.
-David
-
To unsub
A month.. aha. :-)
08.11.2013 3:35 пользователь "Martijn Dashorst"
написал:
> In my opinion it is always a failure of a podling when they can't get
> a release out of the door, or are unable to vote in new committers.
>
> "The future is not something we enter. The future is something we
> create.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> The short guide to graduation: do the work, see it through, persevere
> and graduate.
I think your email contained lots of excellent advice for podlings now in
incubation.
I dream of something better, though. Just because you and I had t
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Certainly this is being addressed and fixed in the current 1.0.1
> release thread...
Indeed.
> So why is something 2 months old such a bee in your bonnet right now?
I chose to highlight the Allura situation because it illustrates that IPMC
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> As soon as you step off your soapbox, be sure to provide some
> suggestions...
When an individual makes major contributions to the incubation of a podling --
particularly in the areas of legal and community development -- they should be
rewa
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> +1 Accept Twill into the Incubator
>
> Patrick
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> > discussion, we have chosen a new name
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:34 AM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
> to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
>
> The pro
+1 Accept Twill into the Incubator
Patrick
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
> to call a vote for Twill to become an incub
Hi all
This month I review NPanday as Shepherd. And this project realy needs
our attention!
There is nearly no Mailing list activity since months. The only one who
writes frequenty is the Jenkins server who told that the build is
broken. The only human who talks some times on the ML is Brett
John D. Ament wrote:
> Well, must be missing something. I'm 'johndament' yet I don't have write
> access to the trunk.
I used to understand svn auth, but not so sure now.
Following this:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#who-auth-karma
It seems to me that all in "committers" as wel
Well, must be missing something. I'm 'johndament' yet I don't have write
access to the trunk.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:26 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> John D. Ament wrote:
> > Well, I can appreciate the frustration.
> >
> > I'm willing to help clean up some of this stuff. Any special rights
>
+1 (binding)
On 8 November 2013 11:16, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>>> > The discussio
+1
Doug
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
> to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
>
> The proposal is p
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:16 PM, Edward J. Yoon wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann
> wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
>> > The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
>> > discussio
In my opinion it is always a failure of a podling when they can't get
a release out of the door, or are unable to vote in new committers.
"The future is not something we enter. The future is something we
create." --Leonard I. Sweet
As a podling is waiting for its release to be approved, I sure ho
John D. Ament wrote:
> Well, I can appreciate the frustration.
>
> I'm willing to help clean up some of this stuff. Any special rights
> required to edit podlings.xml?
IIUC then everyone who comes through the Incubator is able:
http://people.apache.org/committers-by-project.html#incubator
-Davi
Well, I can appreciate the frustration.
I'm willing to help clean up some of this stuff. Any special rights
required to edit podlings.xml?
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:45 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> John D. Ament wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > On that note, how come DeltaSpike is still listed as incub
If the projects that are listed there cannot make the effort
to clean up, then do not be surpised if your subsequent
vote threads are overlooked. This is also not fair on the
other projects, especially new ones.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
> It seems that the brilliant "Voting Status" monitor
>
John D. Ament wrote:
> David,
>
> On that note, how come DeltaSpike is still listed as incubating at [1]
>
> Note the table on the 3rd bullet.
>
> [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/
Because these "graduated" projects do not tidy up after themselves.
They seem to leave everything for other Incuba
+1
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> > discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would
> like
> > to call a vote
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6977
On 8 November 2013 08:20, David Crossley wrote:
> Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>> Hi David
>>
>> not sure what you mean but list are working AFAIK. We got batchee mail
>> this morning again and I got some sirona mails yesterday
>
> The "archives". C
David,
On that note, how come DeltaSpike is still listed as incubating at [1]
Note the table on the 3rd bullet.
[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 5:23 PM, David Crossley wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> > Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > > Hi David
> > >
> > > not sure w
David Crossley wrote:
> Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Hi David
> >
> > not sure what you mean but list are working AFAIK. We got batchee mail
> > this morning again and I got some sirona mails yesterday
>
> The "archives". Clutch gathers the mail list addresses
> by ensuring that the archives are
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Andreas Neumann wrote:
> The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
> discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
> to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
>
> The proposal is pasted belo
On 7 November 2013 11:31, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey
> wrote:
>
> >
> > The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to
> > reward merit earned by individual podling contributors.
>
> Idea: Allow for podlings to nominate, and ele
On 7 November 2013 11:20, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marvin Humphrey >wrote:
>
> > The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to
> > reward merit earned by individual podling contributors. Instead, we
> teach
> > people to hate the Incubator
Thanks David, and the proposal is now on the wiki.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:43 AM, David Crossley wrote:
> Andreas Neumann wrote:
> > Thank you for the feedback, it looks like the name Twill is appealing
> > enough. I will update the proposal with the new name.
> > I would also like to put the
Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi David
>
> not sure what you mean but list are working AFAIK. We got batchee mail
> this morning again and I got some sirona mails yesterday
The "archives". Clutch gathers the mail list addresses
by ensuring that the archives are available [1].
See the URL provided
On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:46 PM, ant elder wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to
>>> reward merit earned by individual podling cont
The discussion about the Weave proposal has calmed. As the outcome of the
discussion, we have chosen a new name for the project, Twill. I would like
to call a vote for Twill to become an incubated project.
The proposal is pasted below, and also available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Twill
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
>>
>> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to
>> reward merit earned by individual podling contributors.
>
> Idea: Allow for podlings to nominate, and ele
Are there other IPMC members who are willing to review this release? We
need two more votes!
- hyunsik
2013년 11월 4일 월요일에 Hyunsik Choi님이 작성:
> Hi folks
>
> This is the fourth candidate for Apache Tajo-0.2-incubating,
> and it is also the first official release for Tajo.
>
> The PPMC vote [1][2][3
Oooh, OK Jim, gotcha I didn't understand the first time.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:49 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards
>
>On Nov 7, 2013, at
On Nov 7, 2013, at 1:37 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> -Original Message-
>
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:31 PM
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards
>
>>
>> On N
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> The Incubator's system for approving releases is at odds with everything we
> believe at Apache about self-governance. It produces inferior releases, an
> inferior incubation experience, inferior students and an inferior ASF. We
> should c
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Date: Thursday, November 7, 2013 12:31 PM
To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Subject: Re: Cultivating Outstanding IP Stewards
>
>On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey
>wrote:
>
>>
>> The Incubator h
Hey Guys,
I agree with Ted below -- and also what I've seen you do Marvin
as well -- let's nominate folks to the IPMC and get them binding
VOTEs and get them rewarded as much as possible.
Cheers,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Ted Dunning
Reply-To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
Dat
On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>
> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to
> reward merit earned by individual podling contributors.
Idea: Allow for podlings to nominate, and elect, Podling "chairs"
which can cast Mentor-like votes.
> Inst
Certainly this is being addressed and fixed in the current 1.0.1
release thread... So why is something 2 months old such a
bee in your bonnet right now?
And no, it's not acceptable. And I will state that, imo, the reason
is due to the mistake of having >1 mentor. Back when the Incubator
1st starte
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> The Incubator has a fundamental structural flaw: it lacks a mechanism to
> reward merit earned by individual podling contributors. Instead, we teach
> people to hate the Incubator by placing their projects at the mercy of
> Mentors. Our M
Greetings,
On August 28th, the Allura podling presented a release candidate to this list.
Three weeks later, the VOTE was still open, and three of four Allura Mentors
still had not been heard from.
It so happens that the wayward Mentors all have illustrious reputations and
exceptional records of
On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:05:06AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> Citrix has donated a plugin for Apache CloudStack to support RDP
> connectivity for virtual machines running within Hyper-V hypervisors.
>
> IP Clearance Document:
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/cloudstack-rdp-client.h
Hi David
not sure what you mean but list are working AFAIK. We got batchee mail
this morning again and I got some sirona mails yesterday
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmann
Those two reminders are intended for BatchEE and Sirona.
Their email dev list archive is not yet available,
so this goes to general@ list.
Clutch does detect their commits lists, but not their dev lists.
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/#batchee.incubator
http://mail-archives.apache.org/
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 November 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator
PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 November 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST. The
report
for your podling
Andreas Neumann wrote:
> Thank you for the feedback, it looks like the name Twill is appealing
> enough. I will update the proposal with the new name.
> I would also like to put the proposal on the incubator wiki (at
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TwillProposal), can you please give me
> the p
On Nov 5, 2013 2:10 AM, "Cory Johns" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a call for a vote on Apache Allura 1.0.1 incubating. This is our
> second attempt at an initial release, which specifically addresses the
> concerns raised in the previous, cancelled vote.
>
> A vote was held on developer mailing l
53 matches
Mail list logo