Sorry for the noise, seems I closed the vote in a new thread.
rgds
jan i.
On 7 December 2014 at 16:17, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
I believe the critical questions by ipmc members have been answered.
On 2014-12-02 18:25, jan i wrote:
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i.
Hello!
The Apache Flink project has just been graduated by the board (we are very
excited about this and celebrating today :-) ).
We are preparing a new release just now and are unsure which protocols to
follow, because we are somewhat in between incubation and TLP now (the
infrastructure is
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
...We are preparing a new release just now and are unsure which protocols to
follow, because we are somewhat in between incubation and TLP now (the
infrastructure is still set up for an incubator podling):...
You are a
All,
I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id. It seems to
me this is done for the reproducible builds concept. Tags are
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving all of
our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular, our GitHub
presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech support mailing list). I
have articulated our concerns in the freshly
+1 on including commit ID (or SVN revision number) along with any tag (or SVN
tag/branch) for convenience.
-Original Message-
From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 05:58
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Votes for git repos - commit
On Thursday, December 18, 2014, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
All,
I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id.
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub presence and our public user-mailing list (i.e. tech support
mailing list). I have
On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub presence and our public user-mailing list
This is to call for a vote for the source release of Apache Brooklyn
0.7.0-M2-incubating.
Call for votes on d...@brooklyn.incubator.apache.org:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-brooklyn-dev/201412.mbox/%3CCABQFKi1P58JJhsgCzXGeW6_fpwHt1imttHENtYPERAgM0nWTGg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Marko,
I note that you currently do not have a champion and that you have listed IBM
as the sponsor, with two individuals names who (to the best of my knowledge)
are not ASF committers. I suggest these are the first things you need to
address in your proposal. Find a champion who can help you
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Daniel Gruno humbed...@apache.org wrote:
On 2014-12-18 17:28, Sam Ruby wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache
To clarify on Daniel's comments this does not mean that pull requests
cannot be merged
You can have Infra set up ASF integration with GitHub such that pull
requests trigger emails to your projects dev list, those emails contain
instructions on how to pull and merge the request into your local ASF
A tad longer answer is that the immutable rules are meant to protect the
Apache Way, because we believe that healthy communities produce health
code. The ASF is a steward of communities that are themselves stewards
of code. The incubation process is meant to benefit the project, allow
new
No vote should be made without the full backing and understanding of the
community.
See below.
rgds
jan I.
Ps. I do think we have a podling
-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i j...@apache.org
Date: 18 December 2014 at 19:09
Subject: Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] make PPMC == committers
To:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On 12/18/2014 11:16 AM, Marko Rodriguez wrote:
Hello Jake,
When talking with Sam Ruby (cc:d) we voiced our concerns about moving
all of our infrastructure over to The Apache Foundation. In particular,
our GitHub
+1 (binding).
Too late for the PPMC vote, sorry.
Findings:
1. Keys verify ok.
2. Notice, license files, copyright statements ok (see #7)
3. Build from source distro without running tests ok (fixed from
previous rc)
4. Build from source distro and running tests ok (fixed from previous rc)
5.
Dear IPMC members,
I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd.
I’ve taken the liberty of adding myself to shepherds.json file. If there are
any objections, feel free to revert the commit.
-Taylor
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:33 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote:
I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd.
Super! I hope you find the experience broadening.
I’ve taken the liberty of adding myself to shepherds.json file.
Extra bonus JFDI points!!
Marvin Humphrey
Good point!
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 01:58PM, John D. Ament wrote:
All,
I was looking through the incubator site and I don't see anything definite.
Whenever a podling goes for a vote, and they include a git tag in their
vote message, it's typically asked to change to a commit id. It seems
And again - big +1: I think the whole data stack will benefit from it.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 05:18PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Zeppelin as an Apache Incubator
project:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
Please let me know what do you think
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:54PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
Restarting vote having fixed resolution detail, dastardly AWOL paragraph
breaks
and removed nod to increased diversity in introduction.
The Samza podling community has voted to graduate from the Incubator.
The vote passed
Thank you to all who contributed to the dissuasion! I think
I took all of the feedback into account and will start a formal
vote in a minute.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
Hadrian
On 12/18/2014 11:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:54PM, Jakob Homan wrote:
Restarting vote having fixed resolution detail, dastardly AWOL paragraph
breaks
and removed nod to increased diversity in introduction.
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal
and is also attached to the end of this email.
Vote is open until at
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:53 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 7:33 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote:
I’d like to volunteer to help out as a shepherd.
Super! I hope you find the experience broadening.
Huge +1 to that! We are always in need
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
+1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
+1 (binding)
On Friday, December 19, 2014, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting
Zeppelin as a new Incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Jaideep
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
+1 (binding)
On Friday, December 19, 2014, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier:
http://s.apache.org/kTp
I would like to call a VOTE for
31 matches
Mail list logo
