Re: [VOTE] Accept Fineract into Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) -- Alex On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > The (binding) terminology means that the person is on the IPMC, and so > their vote is "binding" on the resulting tally. Community members not on > the IPMC are casting advisory "non-binding" votes.

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, James Taylor wrote: > Hello, > I'm the PMC Chair for Apache Phoenix and a PMC member of Apache Calcite, > both top level project and both of which I went through the incubation > process. Recently several projects interested in going

interested in joining the IPMC

Hello, I'm the PMC Chair for Apache Phoenix and a PMC member of Apache Calcite, both top level project and both of which I went through the incubation process. Recently several projects interested in going through incubation approached me to be a mentor, hence my interest in joining - so that I

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

My apologies, Marvin, and thanks for clarifying the procedure. I'll follow up on the private list. James On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:04 AM, James Taylor > wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

We have had several people write in to general@ over the past few months with this type of request. In at least one case a request triggered a vote on the private list. We should update the incubator site with guidance on what is the best way to approach the IPMC if this isn't ideal. > On

Re: interested in joining the IPMC

After Marvin's message I was curious enough to look up the policy. It is documented, and it is indeed as Marvin says: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/participation.html#pmcer I would encourage people to post links when responding to policy questions. It is not necessary, but it helps counter