Hi,
> Great idea, Justin!
Thanks! I’m considering making several examples, perhaps a few other people can
help me out?
> What about including an example in the NOTICE about the inclusion of a
> non-permissive 3rd party license (e.g., LGPL)?
You can’t have a dependancy (other than optional) on
Great idea, Justin!
What about including an example in the NOTICE about the inclusion of a
non-permissive 3rd party license (e.g., LGPL)?
I can make a PR in case you find it relevant.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 2:16 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Ma
Hi Justin,
This is the best guide to understand the topic. Thank you.
Regards
Ajay Yadava
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> great, really helpful !
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
> On 06/23/2016 02:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> At the last ApacheC
+1 (binding)
Regards
JB
On 06/22/2016 07:47 PM, ddek...@apache.org wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201606.mbox/
Hi Justin,
great, really helpful !
Regards
JB
On 06/23/2016 02:16 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
Hi,
At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the issues
around assembling license and notice files. One of the ideas we come up with
was to have some worked examples.
So here
Hi,
> One question - do the other licenses (MIT/BSD) have to be copied as separate
> files
That is the preferred way as otherwise the LICENSE file can become too long if
many licenses are involved.
> or listing their content in LICENSE file is acceptable?
That is also acceptable. If you have
Justin - this is useful. Thank you.
One question - do the other licenses (MIT/BSD) have to be copied as separate
files or listing their content in LICENSE file is acceptable?
On Jun 22, 2016, at 8:16 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about
Thank you everyone for the really helpful feedback.
I will work with Ranger Dev community to address below concerns raised in this
thread.
1] Review and verify all licenses listed in LICENSE are for bundled
dependencies only
2] The code in question (
./apache-ranger-incubating-0.5.3/security-
Hi,
At the last ApacheCon I was discussing with Marvin about some of the issues
around assembling license and notice files. One of the ideas we come up with
was to have some worked examples.
So here is a small example I put together of a fictional Apache project using
Bootstrap. Code is on git
Thursday, June 23, 2016, 12:41:35 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - files name contain incubating
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE contains text that should
> be in LICENSE.
You mean the OpenOffice fi
Thursday, June 23, 2016, 12:48:12 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:41 PM Justin Mclean
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> I checked:
>> - files name contain incubating
>> - signatures and hashes correct
>> - DISCLAIMER exists
>> - NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE c
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:41 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - files name contain incubating
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - DISCLAIMER exists
> - NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE contains text that should be in
> LICENSE. It’s also not clear to me if the
Hi,
+1 binding
I checked:
- files name contain incubating
- signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- NOTICE and LICENSE ok, although NOTICE contains text that should be in
LICENSE. It’s also not clear to me if the text in NOTICE is referring to Apache
FreeMarker or some previous vers
I updated the proposal to request git-wip and JIRA.
Thanks,
JvD
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
>
> > On Jun 17, 2016, at 4:58 PM, John D. Ament
> wrote:
> >
> > Leif,
> >
> > I doubt this is something IPMC can help you with. As champion, I would
> > recommend that you r
Hi all,
The Apache FreeMarker community has voted on and approved a proposal
to release Apache FreeMarker 2.3.25-incubating.
PPMC Vote Call:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-freemarker-dev/201606.mbox/%3c76126262.20160614230...@freemail.hu%3e
PPMC Vote Result:
http://mail-archi
+1 (binding)
-jg
On 22 June 2016 at 09:45, Suneel Marthi wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
>> DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator.
>>
>> [] +1 Accept Di
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Sijie Guo wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
> DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator.
>
> [] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator
> [] +0 Abstain.
> [] -1 Do not accept D
+1 (binding)
--Chris Nauroth
On 6/20/16, 10:11 PM, "Sijie Guo" wrote:
>Hello All,
>
>Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on accepting
>DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator.
>
>[] +1 Accept DistributedLog into the Apache Incubator
>[] +0 Abstain.
>[] -1 Do not acc
Canceling the vote due to the .war containing other .jars that Justin found.
Josh Elser wrote:
Hi folks,
This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release
0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC0, has
successfully passed a vote for a release on the Apac
Thanks for taking a close look as always, Justin!
I didn't think that one through -- "it's just used for testing, the .war
is fine". I appreciate you catching it. I'll try to find a way to build
that on the fly for the tests to use instead leaving it static in the
source-release.
Justin Mcle
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Dave Rusek
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Mahak Patidar wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On Jun 21, 2016 7:06 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Good luck!
> > >
> > > Sijie Guo wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello All,
> > >>
+1
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Mahak Patidar wrote:
> +1
> On Jun 21, 2016 7:06 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Good luck!
> >
> > Sijie Guo wrote:
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> Following the discussion thread, I would like to call a VOTE on
> accepting
> >> DistributedL
kewl. +1
> On Jun 16, 2016, at 5:26 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to discuss the proposal of a new project to the Incubator.
>
> Traffic Control is a CDN control plane that was open sourced in April of
> 2015.
>
> The Proposal is pasted below and can be found on the
Hi,
> I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are
> misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not
> required by the Apache license.
While it’s not in line with current policy, it's not a licensing error to list
them. Several projects do list them.
It ma
I believe this is the ASF's first attempt at a full microservices
framework, it looks great and I look forward to helping this move forward.
+1
John
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:10 PM James Bognar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a
> vote
I think these lines for "The Apache License 2.0" for the non-ASF are
misleading (everything else is also Apache License) and is not
required by the Apache license.
> The Apache License 2.0
> ---
> This product includes Bootstrap D
+1 (non-binding)
On 21 June 2016 at 18:10, James Bognar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It looks like the discussion thread has died down so I am now calling a
> vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator.
>
> For those who are interested the DISCUSS thread can be found at
> https://lists.apache.or
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 7:10 PM, James Bognar
wrote:
> ...I am now calling a
> vote on accepting Juneau into the Apache Incubator...
+1, looks interesting!
-Bertrand
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apach
28 matches
Mail list logo