Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Atlas version 0.7-incubating

Hi, -1 (binding) until font license clarified. The glypicons font is normally a commercially licensed font which is not compatible with the Apache license [9], under certain conditions (i.e. shipped with bootstrap) it’s MIT (bottom of same page) but I don’t see that here. Also please fix for

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

Yeah, I'll have to take another look. I *think* they're good, but who knows what else I haven't noticed :) Will make a note to do before our next release. Thanks again, Justin. Justin Mclean wrote: Hi, - You're publishing a nexus repo, I would expect that you're also expecting people to

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

Will do, John. Thanks for the vote. John D. Ament wrote: +1. A couple of notes: - Please clean out old dists from your dist folder - You're publishing a nexus repo, I would expect that you're also expecting people to review the binary release. John On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:58 PM Josh

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

+1 (non-binding) -Gour On 6/27/16, 10:09 AM, "Billie Rinaldi" wrote: >+1 binding > >On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:58 PM Josh Elser wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release >> 0.91.0-incubating. This release

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.8.2.0 (incubating)

The vote passed with 3 +1 binding votes from IPMC members and no -1s. Here is the breakdown: +1 binding votes carried over from dev list: Alan Gates Flavio Junqueira Daniel Dai +1 non-binding: Francisco Perez-Sorrosal +0 binding votes: Justin Mclean We will proceed to post release artifacts of

[NOTICE] Any23 Committership and PMC += William L. Anderson

Hi Folks, The Any23 PMC has VOTE'd to extend an invitation to William L. Anderson to join the PMC and our Committer base. VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2yNv RESULT: https://s.apache.org/KtX2 Lewis -- *Lewis*

Re: [VOTE] Apache Slider (incubating) release 0.91.0-incubating rc1

+1 binding On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 4:58 PM Josh Elser wrote: > Hi folks, > > This is a call for a vote on the Apache Slider (incubating) release > 0.91.0-incubating. This release candidate, 0.91.0-incubating-RC1, has > successfully passed a vote for a release on the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Todd says he can’t find it, maybe it never went out. I’ll look. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

so does, mine, Todd, I VOTE’d +1 too. ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email:

[VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1

Hi, The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.9.1 RC1 passed and I'm now submitting this to the IPMC. Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-kudu-dev/201606.mbox/%3CCADY20s6%3D%2BnKNgvx%3DG_pKupQGiH%2B9ToS53LqExBwWM6vLp-ns9A%40mail.gmail.com%3E Result:

Re: Report Reminder Emails

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 12:19 AM, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 5:52 PM Sam Ruby wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 11:21 PM, John D. Ament >> wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > Over the past 2 months, mostly in

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi, > Perhaps showing a negative example of a resource you then realize you > can't add, e.g. you find a picture on flickr.com that you want to > bundle, but it's classified as CC Non-Commercial; so you find one that > you CAN include instead, but need to provide attribution for it. Nice idea

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Hi, > I wondered why you did not mention file headers further (beyond for > inspecting licenses), as that is part of ASF policy (while not a legal > requirement for using the Apache license) Very good question, I was just focused on the license and notice and didn’t look at headers and it may

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

Perhaps showing a negative example of a resource you then realize you can't add, e.g. you find a picture on flickr.com that you want to bundle, but it's classified as CC Non-Commercial; so you find one that you CAN include instead, but need to provide attribution for it. Also propagation of

Re: Worked LICENSE and NOTICE example

This is a great tutorial, thanks, Justin! Also good video editing. I wondered why you did not mention file headers further (beyond for inspecting licenses), as that is part of ASF policy (while not a legal requirement for using the Apache license) The example is very simple, but actually there