On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Stephen Connolly
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com wrote:
If there have been over 200 contributors to the project, I would expect to
see an effort to pull some of them in shortly after entering incubation...
Assuming they can demonstrate merrit.
If anybody can
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
podlings do not appear in the acreq script until they have been added to
podlings.xml, even if they file their ICLA with initial committer as part
of groovy.
secretary@ needs to get the grant before we can import the
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
...Another question : who is in charge of all those tasks ?..
If you could create tickets like the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8968 example that would
enable our infra team to get started.
Hi!
over the weekend I've experimented with managing
ASFIncubator via TweetDeck and I really like the
results. In fact, I like them so much that I am going
to suggest we manage the rest of our official ASFxxx
accounts in the following way:
0. The account itself is NOT expected to be used
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:05 AM, jonathon toki.kant...@gmail.com wrote:
On 31/03/15 03:08, David Nalley wrote:
the master ASFxxx account be associated with. I see
two alternatives here:
* ASF Infra team collectively owns it
* Whoever controls @TheASF owns it
Neither IMO.
Infra
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:03 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
In contrast, from a legal standpoint, a signed Software Grant
I don't.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
Just making sure - others besides me are getting the subscribe moderation
emails?
A.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM,
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...Could you please provide an URL (if for nothing else,
just for a future reference).
Here:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 3:19 PM
Hi!
since a few board members requested a detailed document
outlining the exact policy of a pTLP project, I've created this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51812862
which is modeled after the Incubator policy document. My rationale
is this: if the level of
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
...The Incubator PMC might not have a
formal say in pTLP creation, but
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
We don't need consensus from the board. We need data to allow the board to
evaluate properly.
That's fair, but what *exactly* do you need?
The IPMC is tasked with providing recommendations.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
The board have asked for the IPMC to make recommendations.
Is the precise nature of what being asked recorded anywhere?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
It's not unfair. I deliberately tried to say i don't want to distract from
the handover process.
I though we all agreed that whatever pTLP is -- it is absolutely 100%
orthogonal to
the process that
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote:
Assuming Myriad gets voted into the incubator this week, is there anything
I/we will need to do for the March incubator report?
It would be helpful if you could submit your first report during this
cycle. Just
add your
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 9:34 PM, Adam Bordelon a...@mesosphere.io wrote:
Hello friends,
After receiving a positive response on the discussion thread, and even a
new Mentor (Luciano), I would like to call a VOTE to accept Myriad into the
Apache Incubator. I will end the vote after 7 days.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
I would like to pick this thread up again...
Thanks! I apologize for being completely unavailable for the past 10 days
or so -- the amount of stuff happening @$WORK was way too overwhelming.
As a matter of fact, my
Hi Niclas!
First of all: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-9195
Hopefully INFRA will respond soon so we can all collaborate
on the content. At this point I've started the documentation to
the level of details currently on Incubator pages.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
We don't need consensus from
2015-03-26 18:51 GMT+01:00 Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org:
I don't.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Bayer
andrew.ba...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just making sure - others besides me are getting the subscribe
moderation
emails?
A.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bertrand
Hi!
while trying to spread the good news that the Groovy
vote has passed, I've realized that we don't have
a dedicate Incubator Twitter account.
Question for all: should we leverage @TheASF for
the incubator-level announcements or should we
establish our own handle?
WDYGT?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/KWE
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 7:51 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
In contrast, from a legal standpoint, a signed Software Grant doesn't change
much when the codebase is already under the ALv2. (Quite possibly it has zero
effect but I'd need to ask a lawyer about the text of the
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
...The mailing lists derive their power from being focused on specific
topics
I disagree, our mailing lists are focused on
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan dsetrak...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 8:04 PM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it would be good form to let it go for a full 72 hours to give others
the opportunity to vote.
I’d say give it another day, and be happy it’s likely to pass at this point.
That 72 hour guideline/rule is there to
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:42 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 13 April 2015 at 19:19, Greg Chase gch...@pivotal.io wrote:
jan i jani at apache.org writes:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015, dsh daniel.haischt at gmail.com wrote:
Just as a quick remark. Geode might be a trademark owned by
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:26 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
Thanks again to everyone who has contributed towards another strong report
from the Incubator this month -- I'm confident that we'll meet the
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 10:00 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
OK all, discussion has died down, we have 3 mentors, I think it’s
time to proceed to a VOTE.
I am calling a VOTE now to accept the Climate Model Diagnostic
Analyzer (CMDA) into the Apache
* Konstantin Ignatyev
* Lise Storc
* Luke Shannon
* Lyndon Adams
* Lynn Gallinat
* Lynn Hughes-Godfrey
* Mark Bretl
* Michael Schubert
* Namrata Thanvi
* Neeraj Kumar
* Nilkanth Patel
* Qihong Chen
* Rahul Diyewar
* Randy May
* Roman Shaposhnik
* Severine Tymon
Apologies if this has been asked, but Rich's points got me
thinking. As it stands, I'm not sure I can see how Whimsy
can graduate without us squinting just so. Basically, I don't
see a clear way for the community to grow much beyond
the initial list of committers.
In a way, I'd rather see Whimsy
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Not sure if your concern is diversity or scale, so I'll address both
separately. If your concern is
something else please be more explicit.
Graduation does not require diversity of the PMC. It
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
I don't see how this is any different from any other project. The initial
contributors will work on it to
satisfy their needs. If organization X wants to use it they can contribute
code to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
The ASF pays for Infra contractors. Their job/role is to maintain our
systems. Sometimes their duty *may* be to contribute software to $Project
(wherever that may be).
That is *very* distinct from paying a person to
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/Oxt
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 10:46 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion earlier in the thread:
http://s.apache.org/Oxt
I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Geode
as a new incubator project.
The proposal is available at:
https://wiki.apache.org
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Stack st...@duboce.net wrote:
Unless there are other comments on the proposal, I will move to start a
VOTE on accepting Trafodion into incubator tomorrow.
Given that there were a few folks volunteering as mentors (thanks!!!)
should we have the updated version of
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:50 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
Roman,
Is this the same as Project Geode which seems to be clogging my twitter
feed this afternoon?
Sorry about that -- we get excited about open source ;-)
http://projectgeode.org/
If so, it looks like you
Since I'm getting a few off-list questions, I just want to make one point
clear:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:53 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
I'd also like to be able to review the source referred to in the proposal
without having to sign up to the Pivotal network - how can I
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Pivotal are asking me to agree to an evaluation license which I cannot view
before I sign up.
So I have to review the privacy policy first.
This must be a bug in your browser. What OS/Browser are
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Where hand over the Geode name also means hand over the domain name and
GitHub organizations
that have rather confusingly been launched in the last few days.
Yup. Everything that's been published on
* Mark Bretl
* Michael Schubert
* Namrata Thanvi
* Neeraj Kumar
* Nilkanth Patel
* Qihong Chen
* Rahul Diyewar
* Randy May
* Roman Shaposhnik
* Severine Tymon
* Shatarupa Nandi
* Shirish Deshmukh
* Sonal Agarwal
* Soubhik Chakraborty
* Sourabh Bansod
* Stephane Maldini
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Roman,
Could you comment on the potential issue that this proposal is only
offering up the distributed object storage. The problem that might arise
with this is that by offering up a particular specialized core
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
General section looks grand.
We have a few projects unreported, DataFu, ODF Toolkit, OpenAz.
I know a bit about Datafu which has been very quiet for some time.
FWIW: I've been keeping an eye on them and noticed a
I'll do it later tonight if nobody beats me to it.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Dear IPMC - we are one binding vote short. Can anyone chime in, pretty please?
Then we'll have April's Fools release of Ignite ;)
Thanks!
Cos
On
Hi!
my recollection is that the collective opinion
was to discourage the use of KEYS of robots
for signing the releases and prefer individuals
do that with their keys.
I remember a thread to that effect, but I cant
google it. Am I misremembering?
Thanks,
Roman.
Hi!
apologies for CCing INFRA, but since I'm using
their prior art perhaps somebody over there could
share their experience in how they solved it.
What I'm trying to do is to setup a Hipchat room
for Geode poddling (because, you know, it is 2015
and everybody's way too hip for good old IRC).
All
, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:17 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
..I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
blog
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:21 AM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
So I see a bit of nuance here.
The project should not be promoting/advertising non-released artifacts
outside of it's own developer community (e.g. the folks who actually
develop Apache $foo)
The developer, however, may want
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
The distinction is between people who develop the Apache product, and
those who use the Apache product.
Well, that's part of the reason behind me starting this thread: I think
it is time for us to explicitly
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
There is nothing preventing clearly identifiable non-release artifacts
available to the general public. Many projects make automated nightly builds
available for example.
This! Honestly this has
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Jacopo Cappellato jaco...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to
accept
Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project.
The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this
mail.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 7:03 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
First thanks for taking care of getting our podlings onboard, they are the
future of ASF and therefore really important.
Indeed. Here's a tracking page I've created:
https://wiki.apache.org/apachecon/ACEU15Incubator
Let the
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Stefan Reich
stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com wrote:
Sorry, but this is all too complicated. You're not a lawyer, but you let
software development be controlled by lawyers? It leads to stalemate.
I don't know what gave you that impression, but ASF prides
,
Roman.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is quite doable, but it would require steely discipline to get
people to stick to the time limits.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
Hi!
currently I'm
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:45 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:26 PM Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Pistachio can easily embed computation to the storage layer to achieve
the
best data locality to improve the computation performance
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Gavin Li lyo.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
The other difference is in Pistachio we can do computation based on
in-memory storage with data replication. Different from the in-memory
computation in Spark, the storage can be in-memory here.
Have you guys looked at
Hi!
let me start by saying that I feel proud about the
rigor with which ASF approaches management
of the ultimate foundation deliverables: the source
releases put out by our communities. If you read our
policy document:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
and only focus on the source
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Stefan Reich
stefan.reich.maker.of@googlemail.com wrote:
I will personally abolish copyright. Join the future.
unlicense.org
Yes, but! If what you're interested in is creating the biggest
possible user/contributor community for your piece of work
this may
Hi!
with CFP on ApacheCON EU CORE closing in just a few days (July 1st)
I would like to appeal to all the podlings and their mentors to
consider telling your story (and recruiting new community members!).
While all ASF projects are constantly in the business of recruiting, it
is especially
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Alex Harui aha...@adobe.com wrote:
Yep, that’s the “tax” of Apache. IMO, its main reason for existing is to
make users of ASF projects feel comfortable incorporating our source into
their projects because we’ve done our due diligence on the IP/legal stuff
on
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Chen, Alice (Trafodion)
alice.c...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
Our project is using the Confluence Wiki. I am wondering who can be given
write access to the wiki.
From http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html in the section Using a
Wiki to Create
Hi!
currently I'm helping with the Incubator
track @ApacheCON EU CORE and I'd
like to run an idea by you guys. Do you
think that having a 'speed dating talk'
in the incubator track would be useful?
We've got ~40 poddlings, assuming that
only 50% would participate that leaves
~20. If we reserve
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Joe Witt joe.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Apache Incubator
This thread is to call a vote within the Incubator for the graduation
of Apache NiFi.
Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/nifi.html
Incubator graduation discussion:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Cédric,
you are very vague about it, and it could well be that everything is ok.
But I suggest that you let infra@ give a opinion about the security level
of the solution that you running with.
For instance, (IIUIC)
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 6:17 PM, David Nalley da...@gnsa.us wrote:
..I am unaware of a policy that would prohibit a podling from having a
blog at blogs.a.o...
Same here, except maybe that a podling should not
Hi!
can someone please remind me what's the policy
for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
blogging platform?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands,
28, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
Hi!
can someone please remind me what's the policy
for letting poddlings use blogs.apache.org as a
blogging platform?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
IPMC,
we are one vote short here and the absence of this release is blocking Apache
Bigtop 1.0 from getting into RC. Could you please take a look and vote? Thanks
in advance!
+1
Thanks,
Roman.
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:08 AM, Branko Čibej br...@apache.org wrote:
On 24.06.2015 08:34, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Justin Mclean jus...@classsoftware.com
wrote:
Hi,
Moreover, modules under extdata are test only and are not used anywhere
in
the project.
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Pierre Smits pierre.sm...@gmail.com wrote:
Roman,
There is a talk in preparation regarding Trafodion.
Great! Once it it submitted, could you please update the wiki?
Thanks,
Roman.
-
To
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 May 2015, at 08:18, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
...The http://incubator.apache.org/ are way too verbose in
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 8/16/15 4:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 8/7/15 7:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Bill,
So I can release Niclas Hadoop platform, based
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:52 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:16 PM Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:31 PM, John D. Ament johndam
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 1:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
Now that takeaway from this thread for me so far is this: in order for the
trademark enforcement to be invoked there has
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 3:00 AM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Madlib even viable as an independent project?
Yes it is extremely viable. There's been a number of prototypes of porting
MADlib to other SQL-on-Hadoop projects (Impala is the one I know of)
and also quite a bit of
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 1:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...
== External Dependencies ==...
There's some GPL/LGPL stuff in there, IMO the proposal should include
a plan for coping with those
: Konstantin Boudnik, Sergey Soldatov
* Pivotal: everyone else on this proposal
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Roman Shaposhnik
=== Nominated Mentors ===
The initial mentors are listed below:
* Alan Gates - Apache Member, Hortonworks
* Owen O'Malley - Apache Member, Hortonworks
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Christian Tzolov
christian.tzo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is PXF (HAWQ extension framework) going to be managed together with the
HAWQ ASF project or as a child one?
For now it is part of the same codebase managed by the same community.
If it gets
picked up by other
* Tushar Pednekar
* Greg Chase
* Chloe Jackson
* Michael Nixon
* Roman Shaposhnik
* Alan Gates
* Owen O'Malley
* Thejas Nair
* Don Bosco Durai
* Konstantin Boudnik
* Sergey Soldatov
* Atri Sharma
== Affiliations ==
* Barclays: Atri Sharma
* Hortonworks: Alan Gates, Owen
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 8:33 PM, 김영우 (Youngwoo Kim) warwit...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
Great news!
BTW, it might be a invalid URL for the proposal. Should be
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HAWQProposal ?
Two may copy-paste buffers strike again :-( Thanks for spotting it
so quickly. Yes
Seems like for the past two weeks I only have weekends to respond :-(
Apologies for the delay on this thread.
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
1) The concept of a brand covering some artifact doesn't come into play
at
all. Instead, there are two things
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
The Hadoop PMC is utterly free to produce a Hadoop RPM with Hadoop in it
that corresponds to an Apache Hadoop release. Having project
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shane Curcuru a...@shanecurcuru.org wrote:
On 8/7/15 7:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Bill,
So I can release Niclas Hadoop platform, based on Apache Hadoop ?? I
thought the discussion a few years ago was that this was misleading...
No, you cannot. See our
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 6:30 AM, William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On Aug 9, 2015 8:33 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 12:46 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro
Hi Gavin!
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Gavin Li lyo.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roman,
I've taken a brief look at Geode. Pistachio and Geode both can support
similar in-memory consistent HA distributed storage, and the data aware
function routing idea is also similar. Here are what I
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Konstantin Boudnik c...@apache.org wrote:
Following discussions [1],[2] about its current status, the Ignite community
has voted [3] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [4] with 14
(non-binding) +1s:
1. Yakov Zhdanov (PPMC)
2. Gianfranco
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:50 PM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 5 August 2015 at 22:46, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org
wrote:
I don't have an answer about tooling with respect to the need for
widely-available tools. If the concern is for ability to use free tools on
Windows, but
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 7:18 PM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
I wonder how much of the silence is a notion of I don't want to be
accountable if something goes wrong in this podling.
Right, but that same concern could be applied to every single TLP
and yet the board seems to do the
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 3:44 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015, at 10:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my question as of
a week ago: what would be the effective way
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...who else thinks the movement towards empowering
PPMCs and making IPMC very much like the board makes sense?...
How
I've been waiting for a bout a week for other to chime in, but
it seems that nobody has so I'll repeat my question as of
a week ago: what would be the effective way to change the
status quo around IPMC an make it more board like?
Perhaps we can start from making the release policy actually
make
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 06.08.2015 02:43, schrieb Roman Shaposhnik:
[...]
As you probably remember we've discussed this issue not that long time
ago: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.general/49852
The consensus
Hi!
while answering a question on release policies and ALv2
I've suddenly realized that I really don't know what is the
legal basis for enforcing release policies we've got
documented over here:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
For example, what would be the legal basis for stopping
a
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
Let us put that last part a step up... Let us assume someone takes one
of
the released sources of one of the java projects out there, makes
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
...you can call yourself open source software all you want
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 06.08.2015 08:22, schrieb Niclas Hedhman:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
I honestly see no problem with that, again provided that the artifact can
NOT
be confused
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
...you can call yourself open source software all you want,
but unless you get an exception from Fedora Packaging Committee
you
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
I honestly see no problem with that, again provided that the artifact can
NOT
be confused with the one coming from Apache project.
I think
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:28 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
...the maturity model shouldn't be a set of gating criteria, but that the
podling should self-assess its position and to what degree, as
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:48 AM, P. Taylor Goetz ptgo...@apache.org wrote:
Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for
Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator project.
The proposal is available on the wiki [2] and is also attached below.
The VOTE will be open for at
401 - 500 of 942 matches
Mail list logo
