Many of them are stand-alone project on their own that MXNet happens to
depend on. Major open source projects other than MXNet depend on these
projects(e.g. XGBoost depend on dmlc-core). So, for now, they can be
viewed as external dependencies like boost.
DMLC have talked about migrating more
Dear Incubator General:
I am writing this email to seek your experience on how do you try to
encourage diversity in your community and encourage collaboration among
contributors across organizations. One of the key driving force of Apache
is its neural nature which encourages collaboration
Hi Justin, it would be great if we can clarify the policy the submodule
dependencies.
Strictly speaking, these dependencies are in the form of git submodule and
they are not part of the commit tree (instead, they are pointers to the
specific version of dependency).
If we just do git clone, or tag
TVM PMC has finished the report and we are just waiting to get things on
the incubator wiki.
Tianqi
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 2:23 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Podling reports are now due and we’re missing reports from:
> - Annotator
> - Gobblin
> - Milagro
> - MXNet
> - Spot
> - TVM
>
> I
Hi:
Can someone give me write access to the incubator wiki? I need the
permission to migrate the podling report.
Wiki username: TianqiChen
Thank you!
Tianqi
ming there are no further discussion points, I'd like to move forward
> > with a [VOTE]. I'll let this sit here and simmer for another 24h to make
> > sure we are done with the discussion phase.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Markus
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb
Thanks Henry!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:57 AM Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Thanks, Markus.
>
> Hope you do not mind but I have edited the proposal to reflect the changes.
> Since the people did not actually change, I think we can continue with the
> VOTE
>
>
> - Henry
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at
+1 (non-binding
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 12:23 AM Cihad Guzel wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> 28 Şub 2019 Per 11:08 tarihinde Felix Cheung şunu
> yazdı:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 10:17 PM kellen sunderland <
> > kellen.sunderl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
Thank you, everyone.
I will follow up by cross-posting in the TVM community as well as give
a public roadmap regarding next steps together with the help from our
mentors. I am traveling this week and will draft and cross-post the public
roadmap of incubator transition this weekend.
Tianqi
On
Thanks, everyone for helpful feedbacks. I would like to clarify a few
points being raised so far on behalf of the current TVM PMC.
> PMC vs PMC member
Thanks for pointing it out. This is something we overlooked and will update
the proposal to make the change accordingly.
> Champion
Markus has
Dear IPMC:
I am sending this email to let you know that the Apache (incubating) TVM
community started a formal RFC for our first apache release.
Because this is our first ASF release, the community wanted to hold the
release to the highest standard possible, by starting an RFC to ask
everyone to
+1 (binding)
TQ
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019 at 8:40 AM David Sidrane
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you,
>
> David Sidrane
>
> -Original Message-
> From: 俊平堵 [mailto:junping...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2019 9:32 PM
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE]
+1 (binding)
TQ
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 2:05 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 12:14 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Dec 7, 2019, at 1:55 PM,
We would like to thank everyone, including IPMC and our mentors for helping
us getting the first formal ASF Release.
Thank you Justin for your helpful pointers to get the release to hold up to
the Apache standard.
Yesterday the TVM Community held our second annual conference. It is the
first
Thanks Justin for providing helpful feedbacks! and thanks Yizhi for making
the improvement and bringing another RC.
The community did another pass over the licenses and addressed Justin's
note and made a sweep of the codebase to remove all the un-necessary
copyright messages(including those that
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:43 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The license [3] actually provides three licenses. The legacy section of
> > the license indicate that the file is also licensed under MIT and
> > University of Illinois/NCSA.
>
> Forgot to say this isn’t a case of dual licensing,
Thanks Justin, these are super helpful! We will address these problems as
follows, please let us know if you have additional suggestions
- NOTICE is still incorrect
>
We will change "2019 and onwards" to "2019".
- I did notice a directory called "3rdparty/dlpack/apps/from_numpy” is this
> code
tin and Tianqi. RC2 is created with the fixes,
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/releases/tag/v0.6.0.rc2
>
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:52 PM Tianqi Chen
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 2:43 PM Justin Mclean <
> jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
Thanks Justin! This is exactly kind of feedback we are looking for.
The community would like to hold the release to the highest possible
standard, which means we would like to make sure the release meet the
criteria of the standard disclaimer. We will look into the
compatibility issue of LLVM
Re LLVM’s license issue. I believe MIT is a safer choice for compiler-rt
before we confirm with ASF.
Because strictly LLVM’s apache license comes with an exemption Clause which
needs to be reviewed. Given that the code is also dual licensed under MIT,
we should take that as a safer choice until
+1(binding), I checked
- Keys,
- sha512
- DISCLAIMER-WIP, LICENSE, NOTICE
- No unexpected binary files
- Code compiles under nvcc, g++7(need to set DEV=0 to skip warnings)
TQ
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:14 AM Przemysław Trędak
wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> This is a gentle reminder to test and
+1 (binding)
Good luck
TQ
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 6:04 PM Sheng Wu wrote:
> +1 binding.
>
> Good luck ShardingSphere
>
> Sheng Wu 吴晟
> Twitter, wusheng1108
>
>
> zhangli...@apache.org 于2020年3月14日周六 上午1:30写道：
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > We've got positive feedback on the DISCUSS thread, I'd like to
It really depends on how do you interpret the github link as a un-released
distribution. A tarball of un-released source code is of course a
un-released distribution. It seems to be a bit broad to classify a github
link as a un-released distribution :)
In most cases, github is one of the
Like in most cases when the argument can go both ways, I think it would be
helpful to summarize all the views and their pros and cons to give a
comprehensive picture.
The current summary of the points are:
Pros:
-P0: Encourages developers community participation to the project,
exercise
I see, in that case, it would be really nice to add a link to the original
email context (about the infra request to remove the github link),
which would help clarified the situation in the first place. And a good way
to exercise the public archival principle.
TQ
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:40 PM
I see, thanks for the links. I think the past two posts, along with Craig's
suggestion summarizes the cases clearly
TQ
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 7:44 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It easy enough to move off the home page or change the link as Craig
> suggest. I would also suggest change the
I can see arguments goes both ways:)
Apache is about community over code, github is certainly a place where the
(an important part of)community goes to, highlighting the link to that
seems to be OK if the project decide to do so.
TQ
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 4:34 PM Sheng Wu wrote:
> Hi, Justin
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 5:26 PM Tianqi Chen
wrote:
> It really depends on how do you interpret the github link as a un-released
> distribution. A tarball of un-released source code is of course a
> un-released distribution. It seems to be a bit broad to classify a github
> link as a
Looks like the branding issue has been resolve. Good job in building an
active community,
+1
TQ
On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 1:44 AM Sally Khudairi wrote:
> Thank you, Liang. I appreciate your rapid response!
>
> Best,
> Sally
>
> - - -
> Vice President Marketing & Publicity
> Vice President
>
> I’m not aware of any other project that uses CUDU code.
>
I want to point out that most machine learning and analytics related
projects will likely need to involve (and likely distribute) CUDA code,
this would include some of the current TLPs.
Here are some examples using search:
- Arrow
; engagement during this transition. I believe some of the approaches
> used (e.g. which notices from GitHub to channel to what mailing list)
> can be used by other projects to bridge this chasm.
>
> Markus
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 2:30 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Just
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 9:08 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> I would like to revisit a bit about the release topic to shed light about
> the release process.
> The TVM PPMC has always been focusing on producing high quality releases.
>
> - The project has produced five major (non-apache)
Per Justin's feedback. The title has been changed to "Apache TVM and Deep
Learning Compilation Conference".
The TVM PPMC is fully committed to make sure the Apache brand is protected.
Would love to hear about more constructive feedbacks :)
TQ
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 8:40 PM Tianqi C
Thanks Justin. As mentioned in the last email. We are following the
previous naming convention of similar conferences like "Kafka Summit" and
"Spark + AI Summit".
We would be more than happy to change the title to something like "Apache
TVM and Deep Learning Compilation Conference" if the
Thanks everyone who voted, and great discussions.
Per the discussion thread, the incubator recommended for doing another
release.
As per Apache-way, we are always focused on getting consensus.
As a result, we will withdraw the vote for now and will post it again when
there has been another
+1 (binding)
TQ
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 7:49 AM Kevin A. McGrail
wrote:
> I vote +1 (binding). KAM
>
> On 9/10/2020 3:42 AM, Xiangdong Huang wrote:
> > Dear all IPMCs:
> >
> > Following discussions with great support from our mentors,
> > committers and community members.
> > I would like to
Thanks Ming and Justin.
Yes, the conference is in discussion with trademarks@. The event is
organized by volunteers who are also active contributors to the project and
follows similar patterns of other events.
The TVM PPMC would certainly be more than happy to follow trademarks
suggestions on
ces”. The subdomain is not
> providing any software product or deriving services
> related to tvm. The TVM PPMC would be more than happy to follow
> trademark’s suggestion.
>
> Please let me know if the summary could be improved in any way, and we
> would also welcome more f
TVM (incubating) 0.6 are advised to
> upgrade. This release is co-managed by Zhi Chen.
>
> Apache TVM (incubating) community has voted and approved the release,
> with three +1 votes from IPMC members (Tianqi Chen, Byung-Gon Chun, Markus
> Weimer).
>
> Vote thread:
>
> discussion, and did another release.
> > The project's in great shape.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > -Gon
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > > Dear Incubator:
> > >
> > > A month ago we brought up the disc
ility for management of the
projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache TVM
Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache TVM Project:
* Tianqi Chen
* Timothy Chen
* Zhi Che
Dear Incubator:
A month ago we brought up the discussion about graduating TVM as TLP.
After great discussions in the apache way [1], we get good support from the
incubator and also get helpful feedback about producing another release.
The TVM PPMC always focused on getting consensus, and is fully
Sharing some thoughts about this particular question. The intention of the
guideline is to clearly distinguish the Apache from non-apache ones (to
protect apache's brand).
There are a few ways to achieve so:
- W0: Change the release note to indicate the tag is non-apache
- W1: Change the release
+1 (binding)
- signature and hashes
- Disclaimer and License
TQ
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 6:47 PM Xingjian SHI wrote:
> +1 (Binding) I verified autogluon.
>
> Best,
> Xingjian
>
> On 8/19/20, 6:15 PM, "Chen, Ciyong" wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
> Thank you for your time to check and vote on
problem, but I have not seen such an operation
> > in other apache projects.
> >
> > [1]
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r17bdb633ec3ed1f8f80502705f9cc8cc642b189ab99cc2958847c1ac%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4636
> >
> > T
Thanks Justin!
Docker Images and Downloads Stats
- These images are indeed only used for testing purposes.
Note that there are more than 150 PRs every month, results in more than
tens of thousands of tests being triggered.
Every now and then the CI machine need to pull the fresh new image
To follow up the comment on docker image, as I mentioned in my previous
email.
We are changing the use of docker hub name to a new name that does not
contain tvm https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/6360
The tvmai docker hub will be removed after the PR is merged
As I stated in my
Thanks Justin for bringing up these points!
P0: tvm.ai domain
- As you can see that the domain redirects to https://tvm.apache.org/.
So hopefully there is no confusion here.
P2: releases
- The PPMC has a well documented release process[1]
that anyone can go and produce a release.
- While we
Hi Justin:
Again to further clarify the Docker image.
First of all, the PPMC is 100% with you that it is NOT fine to
release docker images with the Apache brand, or not following the
apache official release tag.
The test cache binary used by TVM CI is a different thing.
As the docker image
che
> TVM for official distribution to help people quickly consume and run the
> source code releases.
>
>
>
> [1] https://hub.docker.com/u/apache
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, 4:29 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> > Thanks Justin!
> >
> > Docker Images and Do
Thanks Justin and Henry for the discussion thread.
Please allow me to dissect and summarize again some of the discussion
points:)
C0: Docker Image
- There was a mis-understanding that the docker image like ci-gpu
contains tvm. They do not, and instead contain an environment to
build and run
tvmlang.org was an old url by the project that eventually got deprecated at
some time point, it now redirects to the https://tvm.apache.org/
The PMC makes sure to redirect to the static Apache project when possible
for official project related information.
Due to the mechanism of the discourse
kes sense. Do you think the recent changes to Docker Hub will affect
> this? It might be a good idea to move the images into the Apache org, even
> if they’re not for end users.
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 20:52 Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> > Thanks Matt!
> >
> >
> >
development with the volunteer maintained CI. Running and serving the
community well, we would certainly happy to use a different name if asked by
the trademark.
TQ
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 8:49 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> tvmlang.org was an old url by the project that eventually got deprecated
> a
to Docker Hub. Layers get
> rebuilt when the Docker file changes or you force an update.
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 20:12 Tianqi Chen wrote:
>
> > Thanks Justin and Henry for the discussion thread.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please allow me to dissect and su
s a good release document, why is there no other ppmc
> to serve as release manager?
>
> Tianqi Chen 于 2020年8月29日周六 上午9:51写道：
>
> > Thanks Matt!
> >
> > That was indeed the approach we used before. The main problem of this
> > approach is
> > - There could
Thanks Justin. To further address your listed points:
P0: tvm.io
The original project only uses the domain tvm.ai, which is redirected to
the https://tvm.apache.org/.
Other tvm related domain names have nothing to do with ApacheTVM. Note that
because TVM as a three letter abbreviation is quite
is super smooth.
- Multiple PMC members work together to generate these releases.
TQ
- [1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ad19634352f97d0a5b2bec866bcdecd556ca414cc6d4487b2282ce10%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 8:54 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> We have a
20, at 10:02 AM, Tianqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > Dear Incubator:
> >
> > Following a heated discussion with great support from our mentors,
> > committers and community members.
> > The Apache(incubating) TVM community has formally voted for graduation
> and
&
Project:
* Tianqi Chen
* Timothy Chen
* Zhi Chen
* Byung-Gon Chun
* Ziheng Jiang
* Furkan Kamaci
* YiZhi Liu
* Masahiro Masuda
* Thierry Moreau
* Jared Roesch
* Henry Saputra
* Haichen Shen
* Markus Weimer
* Eddie Yan
* Lianmin Zheng
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLV
>
> >
> > Hope these answers help clarify your concerns and questions about the
> > Apache TVM community.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:58 AM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> >
> >> Thank you Dave!
> &g
ed into the
> dev@tvm mailing list. I just find this strange.
> >
> > Also, the discussion thread looks like a vote. Nothing is really
> discussed about satisfying graduation requirements.
> >
> > Did TVM fill out a Maturity Model?
>
> I see you held that bac
; when
> > needed.
> >
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/list.html?comm...@tvm.apache.org
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 12:16 PM Tianqi Chen wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Dave!
> > >
> > >
>
.apache.org%3E
>
> TQ
>
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Tianqi Chen
> Date: Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM
> Subject: [apache/incubator-tvm] [VOTE] Apache TVM Graduation (#6332)
> To: apache/incubator-tvm
> Cc: Subscribed
>
>
> Dear Community:
>
> Thanks to e
/r91b8f469c6a54769869bb2435b7334a28bcff885ae078ab5612dae00%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E
- [2] voting thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd5b8eefe49af09a2d0913758a5e5737b3fdb9072bc0becf4a2b2c7ee%40%3Cdev.tvm.apache.org%3E
TQ
-- Forwarded message -
From: Tianqi Chen
Date: Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 1:51 PM
Subject: [apache
+1 (binding)
- Incubating in name
- DISCLAIMER-WIP exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE are fine
- checksums
Best
TQ
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 11:59 PM Furkan KAMACI
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 from me (binding, carrying over my vote).
>
> Kind Regards,
> Furkan KAMACI
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:18 AM
Dear Community:
Here is the result thread of the TVM TLP voting .
Voting thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re02a2685f10d8655db192667aaa2e93b979882a4fad4a48f66d5f797%40%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
+1 votes
Henry (binding)
Markus (binding)
Furkan (binding)
Gon (binding)
Sebastian
ted. The vote to release Apache TVM
> > (incubating) v0.6.1 is now closed. I'm glad to announce the results.
> >
> > This vote passes with 5 binding +1, 0 non binding +1, no 0 votes, and 0
> -1
> > vote.
> >
> > binding +1 votes
> > * Tianqi Chen
> > *
+1(binding)
The sigs and sums match,
LICENSE, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER-WIP are good. The license header in source
needs to be updated to conform with ASF convention but given the
DISCLAIMER-WIP it is fine.
Cheers
TQ
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 8:12 PM 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
> +1(binding)
>
> Checked
+1 （binding）
TQ
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:38 AM Kevin Ratnasekera
wrote:
> +1 ( binding )
>
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2020 at 18:54, 张铎(Duo Zhang) wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Good luck~
> >
> > Kris Calvin 于2020年11月23日周一 下午8:51写道：
> >
> > > +1 non-binding, good luck
> > > CalvinKirs
> > >
> >
Thanks Justin. We have sent the resolution to the board a while ago[1],
please let us know if there is additional action to be taken
TQ
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r407930963ef19516074d403703d8173413dd0e395493b9a22d05b7b7%40%3Cboard.apache.org%3E
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 2:16 AM
he persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> > >
> > > appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache MXNet Project:
> > >
> > > * Anirudh Subramanian
> > >
> > > * Bing Xu
> > >
> > > * Bob Paulin
> > >
gt; > > projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache MXNet
> Project;
> > >
> > > and be it further
> > >
> > > RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are
> > >
> > > appointed to serve as the initial me
+1 (binding)
Best wishes
TQ
On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 10:16 AM Yu Xiao wrote:
> + 1 （non-binding）
>
> Best wishes!
>
> Yu Xiao
> Apache ShenYu
>
> Jerry Tan 于2022年11月11日周五 22:48写道：
> >
> > Hello, dear IPMC members,
> >
> > following the [DISCUSS] thread at [1],
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote
74 matches
Mail list logo
